Midterm Flashcards
abstract
Brief description of the study, located at the beginning of the report o Concise summary of the study o Usually less than 300 words o Should provide the following: § Research problem § Results / findings § Main conclusions § Recommendations
best source of evidence
Disciplined Research
bias
Any influence that distorts the results of a study and undermines validity
Bivariate descriptive statistics
Statistical analysis of two variables to assess the empirical relationship between them
median
Order numbers from least to greatest and find the number that sits in the middle
Consecutive sampling
Recruitment of all people from an accessible population over a specific time interval or for a specified sample size
Best possible choice when there is “rolling enrollment” into an accessible population
convenience sampling
Selection of the most readily available persons as participants in a study
BIAS!
credibility
Criterion for evaluating integrity and trustworthiness in qualitative studies, referring to confidence in the truth of the data; analogous to internal validity in quantitative research
critical theory
§ Critique of society
§ Envisions new possibilities
§ Action-oriented
§ Inspire change
data saturation
Involves sampling until NO new information is obtained and redundancy is achieved
Participants are insightful- saturation achieved with a small sample
A larger sample is needed with maximum variation sampling
debriefing
Communication with study participants after participation is complete regarding aspects of the study
Explaining the study purpose more fully
Descriptive statistics
Statistics used to describe and summarize data
Parameters: Characteristics of a population
3 Characteristics:
§ Shape of distribution of values
§ Central tendency
§ Variability
Frequency distribution positive skew
Asymmetrical, the peak is off center, and one tail is other than the other.
When one tail points to the RIGHT the distribution has a positive skew.
inference
In research, a conclusion is drawn from the study evidence, taking into account the methods used to generate that evidence
Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Evidence Level and Quality Guide
.
Levels of measurement
nominal
ordinal
interval
ratio
direct
§ Measurement of concrete items
§ Focus is on accuracy and precision of measurement method and process
§ Weight, height, BP, Respirations
§ Demographics variables: age, gender, diagnosis, income, education
indirect
§ Captures elements of abstract concept (not concrete)
§ Coping, anxiety, pain, stree, depression
§ Can not directly measure but can capture certain elements of the measurement
§ Ex: Pain: FACES scale, observation, physiological measurement (BP, pulse, etc…)
nominal
Lowest level
§ Organized in categories
§ Cannot be compared
§ Exclusive
§ Ex: gender, ethnicity, marital status, diagnosis
ordinal
§ Organized in categories
§ Can be compared (ranked)
§ Rank higher or lower/better or worse
§ Exclusive: has to fit into the categories
§ Unequal intervals
§ Ex: mild, moderate, severe pain OR…no exercise, some exercise, heavy exercise
interval
§ Equal numerical distances between intervals
§ Exclusive
§ Continuum value
§ LACKS A ZERO POINT!
§ If the temp was 0 that just means its cold not that there isn’t a temperature
ratio
§ Highest level § Exclusive § Ordered § Equally spaced interval § Continuum value § DOES HAVE ABSOLUTE ZERO § Ex. Weight, height, volume
Measures of central tendency
Common form of statistical analysis used to describe what is typical
o Mode- # that occurs most frequently (used with nominal data)
o Median- point that divides the scores in half (used with ordinal data)
o Mean- the sum of all values divided by the # of participants (used with interval or nominal data)
member check
Method of validating the credibility of qualitative data through debriefings and discussions with informants
outliers
extremes when comparing with other numbers/subject
PICO question – identify components
P- Person population/disease
I-intervention
C-comparison
O-outcomes
Prolonged engagement
In qualitative research, the investment of sufficient time during data collection to have an in depth understanding of the phenomenon under study, thereby enhancing credibility
Tests for misinformation
o Ensures saturation of important categories
o Important for building trust with informants
purposive sampling
Nonprobability sampling method using researchers’ knowledge about the population to handpick sample members
Can lead to bias
Qualitative sampling methods
Convenience, Snowball, Purposive, Theoretical
snowball
Think network
Asking informants to make referrals
Restrictive to small network
Lower quality in sample