Midterm Flashcards
What is the Analogy of Faith? (by Sam Storms)
At the most basic level, the idea of letting Scripture interpret Scripture; If we try to interpret Scripture on our own, we are likely to get it wrong
What are the Five Assumptions of Divine Revelation (the Bible)?
Inerrant, Accommodated, Progressive, Unified, Perspicuous (perspicuity of Scripture)
What is the Inerrant Assumption of Divine Revelation?
You have to begin with the assumption that it’s true
What is the Accommodated Assumption of Divine Revelation?
It is written so we can understand it
What is the Progressive Assumption of Divine Revelation?
What God began in Genesis is further explained in the rest of the Bible; the Bible is progressive and is built on previous writings
What is the Unified Assumption of Divine Revelation?
It is one book, ultimately one author, and one overarching message
What is the Perspicuous Assumption of Divine Revelation?
It is clear and is meant to be understood
What are the Limitations to the Analogy of Faith?
If you only have one Scripture on a topic, that does not mean it isn’t inerrant because it isn’t repeated anywhere else–sometimes you will only find one verse, but it is still true; If the inference of a passage is clear, it is not false because a correct inference is enough; One positive statement is enough to establish a doctrine
What is Christology?
The Doctrine of Christ; “cristos” means anointed one/messiah, “logos” means study
What is Christology from Above?
Begin with Scripture (God’s Word) and you draw it out of there (Bible driven Christology)
What is Christology from Below?
Based on abilities and knowledge; always has an anti-supernatural bias (Jesus isn’t God and man, no miracles, no resurrection, no supernatural, etc.)
What was the Quest for the Historical Jesus?
Said He wasn’t supernatural or God; believed that the real Jesus was just a man
What was the 1st Quest for the Historical Jesus?
Albert Schweitzer wrote a book called “The Quest for the Historical Jesus” and the Jesus he found, once he stripped away the supernatural, was fascinated with the end time and He was killed because of it
What was the 2nd Quest for the Historical Jesus?
Ernst Kasemann argues that you don’t see Jesus ever make a claim to deity and that He never said He was God; the disciples may have interpreted it that way, but it was in the black letters and not the red letters; the apostles/disciples make these claims that Jesus is God while Jesus did not
What was the 3rd Quest for the Historical Jesus?
Looked for a more Jewish Jesus; “The Jesus Seminar” are convinced that even the red letters are not definitively Jesus’ words because they admit that the apostles wrote the words and they are not necessarily reliable sources; they painted the picture of a Jesus that they wanted to be seen and did not believe Jesus was supernatural; they only saw Him as the Jewish Jesus
What did Ebionism say about Jesus?
(100s AD) Believed that Jesus was the biological son of Mary and Joseph, but He is able to exercise extraordinary supernatural gifts; He was just a special man; they didn’t deny the miracles, but they denied His deity
What did Arianism say about Jesus?
(300s AD) Arias makes the case that Jesus is a created being and He is the first, the highest, and most important created being; “There was a time when He was not”-Arias; stated that He is not eternal but He is immortal; Arias believed in a form of incarnation and denied the deity of Christ by stating that He is a created being
What did Socinianism say about Jesus?
Salsto Socinas argued that Jesus is the most important human ever because God at the baptism, adopted Jesus as His son; Jehovah’s Witnesses believe this; His death was valuable but not substitutionary
What does the Bible say about the deity of Christ?
Jesus is God and God-like, omniscient, eternal with God, worthy of worship; Jesus claimed to be God with the “I AM” statements; He is the good shepherd and offers forgiveness of sins; He claims to be the judge of the world in Matthew; He claims authority over the Sabbath; He accepts worship
What are the implications of the deity of Christ?
Because of Jesus’ deity, we can actually have a real knowledge of God; Christ’s death is sufficient to satisfy God’s wrath and it means something; If He is God, God and humanity can be united in one person; Worship is absolutely appropriate
What is “cur deus homo”?
Why the God man?; Sin is infinitely evil and it deserves infinite punishment; to rescue man from the infinite punishment, he needs substitute who is like him, but the sacrifice also has to be infinitely worthy; thus, he has to be man and God
What are the 3 offices of Christ?
Prophet (He is the revealer), Priest (He is the reconciler and the mediator), King (He is the ruler, above all things, and will be the king in the world to come)
What is atonement?
The central doctrine of the Bible; the work of Christ in His life and death to earn our salvation
What are the various views of Atonement?
Example Theory of Atonement, Moral Influence Theory of Atonement, Governmental/Moral Government Theory of Atonement, Ransom Theory of Atonement, Satisfaction Theory of Atonement, Penal Substitution Theory of Atonement
What is the Example Theory of Atonement?
Christ died as an example of human dedication (Proponents—Socinus, unitarians believed in this theory); Jesus is the example that Christians are to follow and the death of Christ really is the human act of dedication in this theory; thus, the object/focus of atonement is man
What are the weaknesses of the Example Theory of Atonement?
They have rendered Christ’s death unnecessary and He could’ve shown His dedication in some other way
What is the Moral Influence Theory of Atonement?
Christ’s death was a demonstration of God’s love (Proponents—Peter Abelard, Catholic theologian late 13th/early 14th century; most 19th/20th century liberals); Live as Christ lived
What are the weaknesses of the Moral Influence Theory of Atonement?
It only shows God’s love and deals nothing with His wrath
What is the Governmental/Moral Government Theory of Atonement?
Christ’s death is a deterrent to sin; moral influence from the negative—look what is going to happen if you don’t live this way (Proponents—Hugo Grotius, New Divinity—Followers of Jonathan Edwards says that man can contribute to his salvation); Jesus became the scapegoat and the example of what not to do
What are the weaknesses of the Governmental/Moral Government Theory of Atonement?
It’s also a deterrent to not live in a certain way; the focus is on man; it only portrays God’s wrath
What is the Ransom Theory of Atonement?
Christ’s death was a payment to Satan to purchase man’s release (Proponents—Origen, Augustine); you don’t pay a ransom to the rescuer but the hostage holder; the object of atonement is Satan
What are the strengths of the Ransom Theory of Atonement?
They are using Biblical language in this theory
What are the weaknesses of the Ransom Theory of Atonement?
There is no appeasement of God’s wrath; God’s anger is not dealt with because it is made about Satan rather than God
What is the Satisfaction Theory of Atonement?
Christ’s death was a compensation for God’s anger (Proponents—Anselm); death of Christ was compensation; God had to be payed; object of atonement is God
What are the strengths of the Satisfaction Theory of Atonement?
The focus is on God