Midterm 2 Prep (Class 13-22) Flashcards
Reasons for increased consumption of clothing
from social media/trends, globalization (cheaper), rate at which trends rise and fall
What affects what we wear?
> environmental/social impacts of (fast) fashion: what we wear is about the structural forces in our lives, not just personal choice (e.g. weather, destination, accessibility, agency, gender expectations, etc.) fast fashion
commodity fetishism
> commodity fetishism: clothing has dual nature between use and exchange value. The exchange value (price) often hides the social/environmental character, obscures the conditions of production and the flows of capital, and what allows these conditions to occur (labour conditions, wages, profit flows, government involvement, water use, pollution, waste production, greenhouse gas emissions) commodities appear independent from the relationships that produce them
statistics:»_space;25-60mill ppl employed in garment sector, 90% no way to negotiate wage/conditions, 1 garbage truck of clothing per second is dumped, 1.2 billion tons of CO2 produced/year
Why is looking at commodities as objects wrong?
> > > commodities appear simple b/c we exchange 1 for another (money for clothes), but this exchange obscures relationships between people) attribute/structure of economic system, looking at commodities as objects = fetishizing
structural problems: consumer demand, complicated supply chain, lack of gov regulation, histories of colonialism and patriarchy
fast fashion
= readily available, inexpensive, designs come and go fast, quantity produced and disposed is high
What was Marx point about capitalism and a pair of jeans
> > Karl Marx how is great wealth growing amidst great poverty, we need to see capitalism in a pair of jeans signifies a wider set of relationships (geographical) that are more pronounced as economy globalizes
what are overarching structural problems that affect the garment/RMG/fast fashion industry
> structural problems: consumer demand, complex supply chain, lack of gov regulation, histories of colonialism and patriarchy
History of garment sector
> History: 1960s =98% clothing purchased was produced in US, present = 2%, 2000s = 26.2% and 17.1% price fall (Europe and US), 18% and 21% increase in exports from China (US and Europe)
Why could Levi’s not afford to keep making jeans in El Paso
> > keeping production in US was not viable b/c competitors were cheaper (El-paso = 7/pair, China = 1.50/pair)
What is the problem with outsourced clothing
indirect employment = decrease accountability cheaper
Anu Muhammad’s point about increased employment due to RMG but also bad conditions
bad (cheap = abundance, workers are commodities – sell time for wage causes tension similar to Van, housing unaffordability tied to wages out of wacc with living conditions
Anu Muhammad’s point about uneven cost/benefit capture
(workers make unlivable wage whilst companies amass superprofits due to cheap labour)
Anu Muhammad’s point about the power of brands
power (firms put pressure on suppliers for lower prices = race to the bottom between suppliers
economic globalization
economic globalization = ongoing interconnectedness of all aspects of economic activity at a global scale
2nd characteristic of economic globalization (MNCs)
MNCs (own/control production in 1+countries aside from home country) 40% of all trade (primary private economic actor of globalization)
what is the argument for neoliberal economic globalization
> > argument for neoliberal economic globalization = more efficient if diff places can specialize in what they do at a lower cost goods produced at lower cost = better for everybody. There will be some losers, but overall everyone else is better off (globalization is not a natural change)
> expectation: 1) trade liberalization benefits all 2) poverty and development best solved thru economic growth 3) states/international institutions advance policies to support
Problem with neoliberal economic globalization
economic growth is true, but race to bottom –> the conditions are bad and value exports becomes less and less so countries have to export more and more to get the same amount they used to
neoliberal globalization
> neoliberal globalization: set of ideas about what globalization should be (free markets w/ less gov intervention, self-interested individuals and firms maximize own outcomes will maximize social returns)
argument for capitalism
> argument for capitalism = poverty is the natural condition of humanity, and capitalism has delivered steady and dramatic reduction over time
Argument against capitalism, trade liberalization and colonialism
1) does not incl. non-commodified subsistence (e.g. foraging, access to commons, things especially important in the past), 2) enclosure (constrains ppl’s access to food and livelihood, economy/GDP may grow, but what about what the people have lost) 3) WB methodology (prices across whole economy used but only price of essential goods matter methodology matters) 4) lack of info pre-1820s (pre 1800s have little info impression that everything was same before 1820, but colonial processes happened that caused underdevelopment and poverty)
> > TLDR: statistics and graphs used are inaccurate, and the incorporation of ppl into capitalism is actually associated with increased poverty and decreased wellbeing 3rd world was produced by colonial processes, and improvements in health stem from things like unions who demanded better conditions, wages, etc.
How is cheap labour in garments and fashion linked to capitalism and colonialism
> > > 1) the cheap labour fast fashion depends on is rooted in colonial and capitalist processes 2) countries with colonial powers created unequal structures and wealth inequalities that fast fashion capitalize on today
globalization
> globalization = series of successive waves of transformation that remake the world in complex ways economic geographers ask what is happening in processes of economic transformation
>each wave has own drivers, logic, key actors, etc. each wave changes how the next one will happen, and the effects and consequences differ for different groups (social and political fallout from each stage)