midterm. 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Pathogen disgust has a strong ________ function and is uniquely ______, _______ and comes from _______.

A

association (nausea), human, non social , evolution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Systems to prevent pathogens in humans

A

mouth, oral, skin, anus, genitals, body fluids (tears), hygiene, death, gore

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What system trumps disgust?

A

sex and need for reproduction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Moral disgust link is b_______, across c______.

A

bidirectional, across cultures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Moralization direction 1 - disgust as INPUT to moral decisions at the individual level; at social level

A

Indiv: Evolved adaptation for survival and repro, avoids fit cost of condemnation
Social: group fit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Example of disgust as input (moral 1) at social level

A

smoking rules: smoking is disgusting, therefore is morally wrong and societal rules are established

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Moralization direction 2 - morality as OUTPUT to disgust

A

Development of a moral intuition, disgust display is a social communication tool- way to regulate violation behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

example of disgust as output (moral 2)

A

stealing from charity is morally wrong, therefore disgusting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

mechanisms for development of disgust and examples

A

REACTIONS of others(modeling to baby not to play with feces), SIMILARITY(generalization to another similar disgusting thing), EVALUATE PAIRING(2 unconditioned stimuli)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

When does disgust appear in children and what does disgust need to grow?

A

4-8 yrs, needs inculturation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the two contamination laws?

A

Once in contact, always.

If things look similar, they are.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Moral agency

A

Capacity to experience/react to the world in moral terms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Moral judgement

A

Evaluative assessments of experience, includes sense of ought.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Moral theories for judgement (3)

A

Deontological: is ACT right or wrong?
Consequentialist: CONSEQUENCES are the basis for moral judgement
Virtue ethics: moral CHARACTER is basis of judgement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

2 ways to think about moral judgement

A

reflective thought, intuition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Likeometer

A

affective process influencing evaluative judgement (how do I feel about this?)
Quick, unconscious

17
Q

Schnall/Haidt study

A

fart spray, induce disgust, messy room. Vignettes requiring moral judgement response

Causal relationshp between physical disgust and moral condemnation. Not same reaction with other emtions.
The more sublte the disgust, the bigger affective trigger.

18
Q

Kohlberg - rationalist

A

Things are wrong because they are punished. (no emotion factor)

19
Q

Link 6

A

Private reflection - smother the baby

20
Q

Moral dumbfounding

A

Eat family dog. No good reasons for moral judgeent = its just wrong!

21
Q

Response in SIM can vary due to

A

temperament, tuning up ability(learning), reasoning ability, IQ

22
Q

Ellard paper (justice motive)

A
  • humans have functional need for justice that is part of normal cog development
  • we MUST believe in JW
  • diff forms of justice: relatedness to parent, then group same(equality justice) or group different(equity justice).
  • sustaining belief: equifinality (can get to JW many ways), substitutability (diff strategies to JW are exchangeable)
  • Process considerations in rectifying injustice: situational and person factors, cog capacity
  • Protective strategies for JW: ultimate justice reasoning (karma), victims are in a different psyc/phys space (unlike me)
    _ JW in everyday life: visual information online to support good/bad judgements, processing information, recall of the past, imminant justice reasoning (forces keeping it just)
  • we apply these same things to self