Midterm 2 Flashcards
new communication style
- ** no longer unquestionably accept rules and explanations
- question parents and authorities
- become more argumentative
- use abstract thinking
- ability to think critically makes them sensitive to parent’s shortcomings
- can be indecisive as they see many sides to an issue/decision
stereotypes (2)
1) a lot of conflict is inevitable
- research shows teens and parents get along very well, they respect their parents, they share similar values, and agree with parent if there’s a moral issue
2) there’s a generation gap
- research shows there’s more of a difference within teens than between teen and parent
- more differences in opinions (curfews, leisure time), in how they perceive events, and how they define events
critical aspects of parenting behaviour (2)
1) responsiveness
- degree to which parent responds to tennis needs in an accepting, supportive manner
2) demandingness
- extent to which parent expects and demands mature, responsible behaviour from the teen
parenting styles (4)
1) authoritative
- warm
- communicate supportive expectations
- induction
- monitoring
- encourage autonomy
- accepting
- make clear distinction between conventional/legal
2) authoritarian
- place high value and insist on conformity, strict rules
- distrusting
- punitive
- discourage open communication
- moralize conventional issue
3) indulgent
- highly supportive, accepting
- minimal guidelines and consequences
- over-involved
- blurred roles
- personalize conventional issues
4) indifferent
- overall indicate no concern
- little if any energy/time
- little if any support/expectations
- few if any consequences
- dismissing
- detached, withdrawn
outcomes of parenting styles
1) authoritative
- responsible, self-assured, creative, intellectually curious, socially skilled, autonomous, healthy peer relationships, identifications with parents
2) authoritarian
- more dependent, passive, socially incapable, less self assured, less intellectually curious
3) indulgent
- less mature, less responsible, more conforming to peers
4) indifferent
- more impulsive, more likely to engage in delinquent behaviours
attachment types (2)
1) secure: positive emotional bond develops between ten and caring significant other
outcomes
- cohesive relationship
- adopt family’s values in intellectual/cultural activities
- more active problem-solving strategies
- positive perceptions of family relations
- wish to attain similar adult relationships
2) insecure: difficulties in relationships - negative aspects in bonding
outcomes (3)
- avoidant: sense of mistrust in adult relationships, little interest in family affairs, avoidant problem solving
- anxious/ambivalent: express desire for deep/secure commitment, high amount of conflict, families exert high degree of control over members, avoid confrontation, passive appraisal problem solving
- uninvolved/detached
coping with stress (3)
1) active
- mature coping abilities
- autonomy
- confront experience and manage it
2) avoidance
- deny or minimize
- avoid confronting the stressful situation
3) wishful thinking
- some disengagement from stressful experience
- more likely active coping if
- parents: express warmth, clear guidelines, healthy living environment, support in decision-making
- teachers: provide socialization experiences that encourage active coping
nature vs nurture
genes may shape biological tendencies but environment determines outcome
- antisocial/delinquent behaviour if have delinquent peers
- depression if family conflict
- smoking more likely if parents don’t supervise
- intelligence if stimulating family environment
divorce
more impactful if
- psychological or social problems before divorce
- family conflict high before/after divorce
- teens forced to take sides
- parents don’t maintain amicable post-divorce relationship with each other and teen
- family suffers economic or other stress as result of divorce
poverty
-
- heightened risk of psychological difficulties and problem behaviour
- impact on parent’s mental health
- higher overall stress levels
- poor neighbourhoods - inadequate social support
2 important protective factors
- confidence promoting strategies
- restrictive strategies to minimize their exposure
cliques
small groups (2-12)
- close friendships
- shared attitudes and activities
- value each other
- learn from one another
cliques chosen by
- shared activities and interests
- residentital segregation
- academic achievement
determining factors
- orientation toward school, i.e. future plans
- orientation toward teen culture, i.e. music, clothing
- involved or not involved in antisocial activities, i.e. gangs
crowds
large groups, based on reputation/stereotypes, i.e. jocks
impacts
- branded on who they hang around with
- important role in developing self, identity
- impacts teens behaviour and feelings about self
- if high self-esteem, will identify with crowds of higher status
effects on behaviours
- imitate the behaviour of crowd leaders
- establishment of group norms, values, expectations
- reinforced for behaving in ways consistent with norms
reinforced by
- improved self-esteem
- crowd membership becomes part of identity
- sense of belonging
reciprocal process of selection/socialization
reciprocal relationship between
- teens’ characteristics influence their choice of friends
- teens’ friends influence each other’s characteristics
thus, reciprocal relationship between selection/socialization
types of popularity (2)
1) socio-metric popularity
- refers to how well-liked someone is
- determined mainly by social skills, friendliness, sense of humour
- qualities are valued by people of all ages/backgrounds
2) perceived popularity
- how much status or prestige one has
- determinants of perceived popularity are highly variable
types of unpopularity (3)
1) aggressive
- use relational aggression, which is intended to harm other teens through deliberate manipulation of their social standing
- physical and relational aggression correlated
- relational aggression used by both sexes, but girls more aware of it, more distressed by it, and more often victims of it
2) withdrawn
- creates a victimization cycle
- suffer from a cycle of behaviour that includes anxiety/difficulty breaking into groups
- rejected and teased by peers which increases social anxiety
- more they’re teased/rejected/victimized, the more anxious and hesitant they feel, and the more they blame themselves for their victimization
3) aggressive-withdrawn
- combination of the above
negative consequences of rejection/unpopularity
1) negative mental health and psychological development which may lead to depression, behaviour problems, academic difficulties
2) aggressiveness
- conduct problems and involvement in antisocial activity
3) withdrawn-aggressive teens
- risk for low self-esteem, depression and diminished social competence
4) unpopular, aggressive teens are more likely to engage in hostile attributional bias, which is when they interpret others’ behaviour as deliberately hostile