Final Exam Flashcards
meaning of ‘identity’
the distinctive combination of personality characteristics and social style by which:
1) one defines him/herself
2) one is recognized by others
involves the exploration of one’s abilities, thoughts, feelings and interests
changes that impact identity development
biological
- changes in body image
- changes in appearance
social
- interaction and feedback from peers
- begin to question social roles
- become self-conscious
cognitive
- abstract reasoning power: can think of “who am i” as well as “who could i be”
- possible selves: various identities a teen might imagine for him/herself
false-self behaviour
- behaviour that intentionally presents a false impression to others
- teens are more likely to act authentically w/ their parents, and less likely w/ a romantic partner
- more likely to act authentically w/ close friends than w/ parents
- think it’s OK if trying to impress someone
more likely to engage in a false sense of self if
- not close to parents and peers
- have a low sense of self
- more depressed and hopeless
- if they devalue their true self and act inauthentically, they’re more likely to become depressed - vs those who put on a false front to please others
empty self
if one has no definition of self
impact of cognitive changes on identity development
self-conceptions become more
1) complex
- use a variety of personal and interpersonal traits to describe themselves - i.e. friendly, obnoxious
- don’t describe selves in just external characteristics
2) differentiated
- realize personality can be expressed in different ways in different situations
- can discuss how external situations can impact an internal state
- realize they behave in one way most of the time, but circumstances can create change
3) abstract
- not just concrete descriptions of how they behave but higher order descriptions, i.e. tolerant
4) integrated
- realize they need to come to term with discrepancies/contradictions in order to understand who they really are
- question: which is the real me and which one is the phone me?
- organization becomes more logical - organize/integrate different aspects of themselves into one
authentic and inauthentic self
?
Erikson’s theory of identity development
the teen’s social context will determine whether their search for self-definition will become a full-blown crisis, or a manageable challenge
identity vs identity diffusion
- the normative crisis characteristic of the 5th stage of psychosocial development
psychosocial moratorium
- a period during which individuals are free from excessive obligations/responsibilities, and can therefore experiment w/ different roles/personalities
- a “time out” during adolescence
- without this, identity development can be impeded
- considered an ideal - a luxury of the affluent
Marcia’s theory of identity development
2 processes
- exploration: involves searching out and examining alternatives in a particular area
- commitment: a matter of choosing a belief/course of action and making a personal investment
4 statuses:
1) identity diffusion
- the incoherent, disjointed, incomplete sense of self characteristic of not having resolved the identity crisis
- low commitment, low exploration
- generally apathetic, uninterested, not close to peers, at risk for school failure/depression/substance abuse
2) identity foreclosure
- premature establishment of a sense of identity, before sufficient role experimentation has occurred
- high commitment, low exploration
- tend to be closed-minded, rigid, somewhat authoritarian, tendency to resist change
3) identity achievement
- high commitment, high exploration
- more balanced thinking, more effective decision making, better relationships
4) moratorium
- low commitment, high exploration
Marcia’s theory of identity development
2 processes
- exploration: involves searching out and examining alternatives in a particular area
- commitment: a matter of choosing a belief/course of action and making a personal investment
4 statuses:
1) identity diffusion
- the incoherent, disjointed, incomplete sense of self characteristic of not having resolved the identity crisis
- low commitment, low exploration
- generally apathetic, uninterested, not close to peers, at risk for school failure/depression/substance abuse
2) identity foreclosure
- premature establishment of a sense of identity, before sufficient role experimentation has occurred
- high commitment, low exploration
- tend to be closed-minded, rigid, somewhat authoritarian, tendency to resist change
3) identity achievement
- high commitment, high exploration
- more balanced thinking, more effective decision making, better relationships
4) moratorium
- low commitment, high exploration
3 components of identity development
1) self-conceptions/constructs
2) self-esteem
3) sense of identity
self-conceptions
the collection of traits and attributes that individuals use to describe/characterize themselves
self-esteem
the degree to which individuals feel positively/negatively about themselves
sense of identity
the extent to which individuals feel secure about who they are and who they’re becoming
self-esteem
the degree to which individuals feel positively/negatively about themselves
- self-image stability: the degree to which an individual’s self-image changes from day-to-day
- self-consciousness: the degree to which an individual is preoccupied w/ his or her self-image
sense of identity
the extent to which individuals feel secure about who they are and who they’re becoming
meaning of “intimacy”
the psychosocial domain concerning the formation, maintenance, and termination of close relationships
childhood friendship > intimacy
biological changes
- changes in sexual impulses at puberty provoke an interest in sex - which leads to the development of romantic relationships
cognitive changes
- changes in thinking (especially social cognition) are related to the development of intimacy
- growth of social cognition permits teens to establish/maintain relationships that are characterized by higher levels of empathy, self-disclosure and sensitivity
- pre-teen’s limitations in perspective-taking may make it impossible to form intimate connections
social changes
- new behavioural independence = more time spent alone w/ friends
- emotional and social autonomy
childhood vs adolescent friendship
childhood
- kids talk about sharing, helping, and common activities
- friendship in terms of companionship
adolescence
- talk about common interests, similar attitudes, values, loyalty/commitment
- intimacy becomes part of the definition - friendships begin to have strong emotional bonds
components of intimacy
- feeling of emotional closeness/emotional bonds
- interconnectedness - concern for each other
- disclose private information
- sharing of common interests and activities
Bowlby’s theory of attachment
secure attachment
- healthy attachment between infant and caregiver, characterized by trust
anxious-avoidant attachment
- insecure attachment between infant and caregiver, characterized by the infant’s feelings of indifference toward the caregiver
anxious-resistant attachment
- insecure attachment between infant and caregiver, characterized by distress at separation and anger at reunion
results of secure/insecure attachment
secure
- advanced social competencies, i.e. trust
- internal working model
- allows one to enter more satisfying intimate relationships
- more assertive and autonomous
insecure
- more sensitive to rejection (rejection sensitivity)
- more emotional problems - more likely to develop depression/anxiety
- more behaviour problems
Bowlby’s theory of attachment
secure attachment
- healthy attachment between infant and caregiver, characterized by trust
anxious-avoidant attachment
- insecure attachment between infant and caregiver, characterized by the infant’s feelings of indifference toward the caregiver
anxious-resistant attachment
- insecure attachment between infant and caregiver, characterized by distress at separation and anger at reunion
results of secure/insecure attachment
secure
- advanced social competencies, i.e. trust
- internal working model
- allows one to enter more satisfying intimate relationships
- more assertive and autonomous
insecure
- more sensitive to rejection (rejection sensitivity)
- more emotional problems - more likely to develop depression/anxiety
- more behaviour problems
internal working model
the implicit model of interpersonal relationships that an individual employs throughout life - believed to be shaped by early attachment experiences
brain activity and rejection
adolescence a time of heightened sensitivity for most - however, while some experience “normal” sensitivity, others are highly vulnerable to being rejected
- if high in rejection sensitivity, social exclusion will show different patterns of brain activity
- increases risk of depression/anxiety
rejection sensitivity
heightened vulnerability to being rejected by others
personality of securely attached teen
traits
- positive, less anger, appropriate, assertive, autonomous
outcome
- more stable relationships, more socially competent, academic success, less likely to abuse alcohol/drugs
personality of insecurely attached teen
traits
- more negative, anger, sadness, dependent (too close) or independent (too far)
outcome
- range of problems
- maladaptive coping, depression, anxiety, eating disorders, delinquency
personality of insecurely attached teen
traits
- more negative, anger, sadness, dependent (too close) or independent (too far)
outcome
- range of problems
- maladaptive coping, depression, anxiety, eating disorders, delinquency
Erikson’s theory of intimacy development
Erik son perceived that one had to form an identity before one could reach the stage of intimacy
- forming an identity occurs by the end of adolescence
- it is less the sequence than the fact that the development of identity and intimacy are closely linked
- identity facilities intimacy
intimacy vs isolation stage
- adolescence as a type of pseudo-intimacy - lack deep intimacy
- pseudo-intimacy: throw themselves into going steady but have not yet formed an identity (mistrustful)
- composed of selflessness, sexuality, deep devotions
- if they have difficulty, then feelings of loneliness, isolation and fear will result
- propinquity: the state of being close to someone
- focus on developing close intimate relations by the end of adolescence
paradox of self-disclosure if there’s jealousy
jealousy = concerns about loyalty and rejection, which results from low self-esteem and high rejection sensitivity
becomes paradoxical b/c self-disclosure puts them at risk rejection
paradox of self-disclosure if there’s jealousy
jealousy = concerns about loyalty and rejection, which results from low self-esteem and high rejection sensitivity
becomes paradoxical b/c self-disclosure puts them at risk rejection
results of intimacy development
results
- increasingly sensitive to feelings/needs of friends - i.e. higher levels of empathy, more responsive
- provide comfort if friends is having problems
- better at conflict resolution
- less controlling and more tolerant of individuality
relationship between gender and intimacy
females are more intimate
- express greater interest in close relationships
- greater anxiety over rejection, greater concern about friends’ faithfulness, prefer to keep friendships more exclusive
- in conversation, more collaborative
- expression of intimacy more advanced
- self-disclose more b/c they think it’ll make them feel better
differences in problem solving:
males
- conflict briefer
- typically over issues of power/control
- resolved by letting it go, done w/o effort
- can lead to physicality
females
- more likely to mention intimacy
- express greater interest/concern
- more likely to ruminate/co-ruminate
relationship between gender and intimacy
females are more intimate
- express greater interest in close relationships
- greater anxiety over rejection, greater concern about friends’ faithfulness, prefer to keep friendships more exclusive
- in conversation, more collaborative
- expression of intimacy more advanced
- self-disclose more b/c they think it’ll make them feel better
- suffer more if things are going poorly
- co-rumination brings friends closer, but also contributes to girls’ depression/anxiety
- boys have same degree of intimate knowledge about their best friends - they just express intimacy in a different way
gender differences in problem solving
males
- conflict briefer
- typically over issues of power/control
- resolved by letting it go, done w/o effort
- can lead to physicality
females
- conflicts are longer, and typically about some form of betrayal
- more likely to mention intimacy
- more intimate conversations
- express greater interest/concern
- more likely to ruminate/co-ruminate