Midterm Flashcards
help help help
What is Carl Elliot’s primary question
Why is there a sudden recent surge in mental illness? Is it just because we’re getting better at diagnosis or there’s actually more autism, ADHD, etc?
Elliot’s 4 distinct factors that influence mental illness prevalence rates
1) Ascendency of biomedicine
2) Treatment efficacy
3) Support & advocacy
4) Marketing
Elliot’s 4 factors – ascendency of biomedicine
Biomedical definitions of mental illness are the primary way we diagnose; evolving defs –> changes in prevalence rate
What is the DSM
Diagnostic & Statistical Manual
handbook of psychiatry; designed to created standardized diagnoses for mental health disorders
How has the DSM changed over the years
Newer versions of the DSM have more disorders, more thorough descriptions, and evolving criteria
DSM-1 had 106 disorders and 103 pages, DSM-5 (most recent) has ~300 disorders and 900+ pages
Elliot’s 4 factors – treatment efficacy
- Treatment SUCCESS produces uptick in diagnoses
- Many disorders not officially recognized until there was a success in treating it
Elliot’s 4 factors – support and advocacy
Communities emerge and share vocab, spread info/awareness abt the condition, combat stigma
- Encourages ppl to be more outspoken abt their condition + be less afraid to get formal diagnosis
Elliot’s 4 factors – marketing
Big pharma markets products to DOCTORS saying they “treat a proper illness”
- They may be promoting cures for bogus ailments in some cases
Transient mental illness
Mental illnesses that only show up at some times and some places – can assume they’re connected with the culture of the place
Interactive kinds vs indifferent kinds
Interactive kinds: classifications that influence the ppl they categorize
Indifferent kinds: classifications don’t affect the classified entities (e.g., chemical elements, quarks, a species)
Human reflexivity
Describes how ppl often react to how they’re classified by changing an aspect of their behavior, identity, or self-perception (related to looping effects)
Looping effects
Enough change from human reflexivity –> the original things we claimed to know are now false –> classification itself may change around the ppl in it
Constructionist vs biological camp
Constructionist: disorders thought of as INTERACTIVE
Biological: disorders thought of as INDIFFERENT
Does Hacking believe that something can be both interactive AND indifferent?
YES – argues that we should make room for both camps and that psychopathologies (i.e., mental illnesses) are both interactive AND indifferent
Hacking’s Pathology P
Uses it as an example and ties it to autism to illustrate how smthn can be both interactive and indifferent
P is indifferent by definition, BUT it affects how the afflicted individual moves thru life, so its also interactive
Classificatory looping vs biolooping
Classificatory looping: INTERACTIVE – literally just the looping effects and categorizations idk what else to say here
Biolooping: INDIFFERENT – changes in our ideas change our physical state (weird phenomena, but our genes don’t change their expression bc we tell them to)
First example of an interactive kind
“Feeblemindnedness” in early 1990s
- Later became idiot, imbecile, mental retardation, intellectual disability
- Influenced eugenics
According to Nomy Arpaly, how are BPD and diabetes similar
- Drug treatments
- Can’t be ‘“wished away”
- Ranges in severity
What are the 2 dimensions of mental states
Warranty & Desirability
- Warranted vs unwarranted: whether or not the belief/emotion is justified
- Desirable vs undesirable: good or bad to feel a certain way in that context
Physical causes vs content efficacy
Physical causes: you cry bc the opera is too loud
Content efficacy: you cry bc of the lyrics of the song
Reason responsiveness
Specific kind of content efficacy adjacent to warranty
According to Arpaly, what sets mental states apart from physical states
Warranty and content efficacy
Resignation Syndrome + why it’s so strange
Condition where an individual who was originally fully functional but had experienced past traumatic events enters state of extreme withdrawal and apathy
- strange bc it seems to ONLY affect the children of asylum seekers in Sweden – no outside cases reported indicate a sociocultural factor
- Some pops like those from Russia seem to be most vulnerable
- Number of cases has reportedly decreased
Hegemony of normalcy
The idea of using norms to enforce dominance over a group
- Does NOT work thru overt coercion; works thru consent, persuasion, and normalization of power structures