Midterm Flashcards

1
Q

Monopoly of force

A

is an organization that monopolizes coercive power and decision-making authority within a geographic territory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

The State

A

is an organization that monopolizes coercive power and decision-making authority within a geographic territory. - WEBER

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Power

A

The ability to cause a person either to take an action that she would prefer not to take or to refrain from acting in ways that she would prefer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Sovereignty

A

The power or authority to make and enforce decisions for a group of individuals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

War and conflict

A

The notion that the state became the dominant political unit because of its superiority in waging war and taking over territory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Bureaucracy

A

An organization with rules and regulations that coordinates a large group of people whose jobs entail governing the population within a territory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Taxation

A

The required contribution of resources from people living within a territory whose use is determined by the leaders governing the population.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Commerce and trade

A

The notion that the state became the dominant political unit because of its superiority in promoting economic exchange which led to an increase in the wealth of people living within the territory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Imperialism

A

A political system in which some states exert influence over other territories through the use of diplomacy and military force.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Colonialism

A

A form of imperialism in which some states exert direct control over other territories through the establishment of settlements.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Public goods

A

Items that an individual can consume without reducing its availability to others and the consumption of which no one is excluded.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Free riding

A

When members of a group who benefit from a collective good fail to contribute to the provision of it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Rivalrous

A

A characteristic of a good in that consumption of the item by some people prevents others from simultaneously consuming it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Excludable

A

A characteristic of a good in that people can be prevented from consuming it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Selective incentives

A

Rewards or punishments given out on the basis of whether individuals contributed to the provision of a good.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Coordination problem

A

A situation in which individuals will be better off if they choose the same course of action, but where there are multiple actions that will work well, and no obvious reason to prefer one over the other.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Shared beliefs

A

Beliefs about the action to take in a given situation which is shared among members of a group, allowing them to act in coordinated, predictable ways

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Focal point

A

A natural center of focus for members of a group which helps coordinate their expectations and actions in the absence of direct communication.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Order

A

A situation in which individuals do not fear for their lives or the sources of their livelihood.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Disorder

A

A situation in which people face insecurity about their physical well-being or possessions because those who possess superior force can exercise it without restraint.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

State Building

A

The process by which territorial units develop their ability to use force and extract taxes from the population.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Political regime

A

The rules that define who has power in a state, how the people with power are chosen, and who can hold these people accountable for how they use their power.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Tragedy of commons

A

A situation in which individuals, who have access to a common resource, act independently following their self-interest, resulting in depletion of the resource.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

International organizations

A

Entities formed by agreements between states which enjoy legal status above the level of a state, and which are charged with pursuing goals embedded in international agreements.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Non-governmental organizations

A

Nonprofit entities which operate independently of states in the pursuit of humanitarian, political, economic, or social goals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Closed-list system

A

System in which voters vote for a party list, not for individual, specific candidates within this list.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Open-list system

A

System in which voters vote for a party list and also for one or several candidates within that list.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Ranked-choice voting

A

System in which voters rank the candidate by order of preference (first, second, third, or more).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Plurality

A

Rule according to which the candidate with the most votes is elected, even if that is under 50%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Majority

A

Rule according to which a candidate must obtain more than 50% of the votes to get elected.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Proportionality

A

Rule according to which the share of seats that a party obtains in a given district corresponds to its share of votes, also known as proportional representation (PR).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Mixed system

A

A system that combines plurality (or majority) and proportional representation in the transformation of votes into seats

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Modern State

A
  •  Defined borders and territory
  •  Within state territory government has monopoly on legitimate use of
    force
  •  Authority flows from center to regions
  •  Common legal system (with or without the rule of law)
  •  Common currency, flag, anthem
  •  Standing army, police, bureaucracy, judiciary, taxation, etc
  •  Social welfare system (schools, hospitals)
  •  Mass concept of citizenship (mass nation)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

States in Premodern Period (pre 16th century)

A

Local personal and commercial relations define lives of people; broader ranges of authority were only
* vaguely defined
*  Armies did not represent broader authority
*  State borders not precisely defined
*  No common legal system
*  State building was a slow and violent process:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Regimes

A

the content of the rules that define who has power in a state, how the people with power are chosen, and who can hold these people accountable for how they use their power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

STATES IN THE EARLY MODERN PERIOD: 16TH19TH C

A

Modern states emerged by the early modern period and further strengthened during this period
*  Economic and scientific progress in Europe
*  Need for people and goods to quickly move across large territories
*  Warfare become more costly
*  Rulers need more revenues from subjects
*  1648 Peace of Westphalia
*  The Pope no longer the highest political authority

34
Q

Features of modern states that can be compared

A
  • Sovereignty
  • Legitimacy
  • Capacity
  • Size
  • Autonomy
35
Q

State size:

A

the extent of state role in the economy and society– how much does the state seek to regulate?

36
Q

State capacity:

A

State ability to fulfill tasks and to implement policies independently of internal rivals

37
Q

Autonomy

A

Ability of states to formulate and pursue goals independent
of public and narrow particularistic interests

38
Q

Positive and negatives of high state autonomy

A

+
The state is not captured by narrow groups, can act in the interests of society as a whole
* Can respond quicker to a crisis situation

-
Highly autonomous state does not listen to society (undemocratic,
unaccountable)

39
Q

Sovereignty

A

State ability to carry actions independently from external rivals and
authorities

40
Q

Involuntary loss of sovereignty:

A

Being relegated to another country’s sphere of influence or become victim of imperialist policies

41
Q

voluntary loss of sovereignty

A

International law– countries have to comply with conventions they sign on to and accept
limits to their sovereignty as a result (e.g. ECHR, laws of war, etc)
* Economic interdependence– tariffs and duties cannot be determined with full sovereignty
* International organization membership– EU membership means countries delegate a part of their sovereignty to the supranational institutions

42
Q

UKRAINE on comparable features of modern state

A
  • State capacity believed to be low: high tax evasion by oligarchs, welfare state malfunctioning due to bad economic performance and corruption. Prediction:
    Ukraine would be overrun by Russia easily in an invasion
  • State capacity turned out to be higher: army stopped Russian advance immediately, economy continues functioning, trains run on time, “invincibility centers” during energy grid bombings, pensioners still receive pensions, etc.
  • State autonomy: civil society constrains state institutions (good); oligarchs have outsized influence on policies (bad)
  • State sovereignty: Russia invaded to install a puppet regime (involuntary, complete loss of sovereignty); instead Ukraine wants to integrate in EuroAtlantic institutions
43
Q

Head of Government

A

Deals with everyday tasks of running the state (has power and accountability)

44
Q

Head of State

A

Symbolizes the people nationally and internationally (symbolic functions)

45
Q

PRESIDENTIALISM: DEFINING FEATURES

A

Executive and legislature are elected separately
* President is both head of state and head of government and is usually directly elected (US is exception
with electoral college) to a fixed term in office (can be removed only under exceptional
circumstances; impeachment)
* Legislature is elected through a separate vote
* Govt/cabinet is appointed by president, responsible to, and can be fired by president (not legislature)
* Both president and legislature have electoral mandate and distinct powers; neither one has primacy
or can remove the other (unless extreme circumstance); System of dual legitimacy (Linz)
* Real possibility of divided government, i.e. when presidency and legislature are controlled by
opposing parties.

46
Q

PARLIAMENTARISM: DEFINING FEATURES

A
  • Executive and legislative branches are fused
  • Head of Government (PM) is NOT directly elected but elected by the legislature
  • Divided government is impossible by definition, but minority government is possible
  • Executive does not serve fixed term in office– head of government can be removed
    at any time by parliamentary majority; happens w different frequency in different
    parliamentary states
  • Head of state can be a monarch or even a president, but the head of state and head
    of government are two separate people
  • Head of state is usually not directly elected and is not very powerful, so just having
    a president does NOT make the system presidential!
47
Q

SEMI-PRESIDENTIALISM

A

The head of state (usually the President) and the head of government (usually PM) are two different people, both with real power
* President is directly elected for a fixed term
* Legislature is elected separately, and PM is elected by the legislature- NOT appointed by
president as in presidential systems!! PM can be removed by the legislature
* Possibility of “cohabitation,” i.e. when legislature is controlled by party or coalition different from
the president’s party, PM and president are from 2 different parties
* Actual powers of PM vs President are important. If there are both president and PM, but president
is clearly more powerful and can appoint or remove PM this is presidential, not semi-presidential
system; sometimes even super-presidential (e.g. Russia)
* Having both PM and President does not automatically make it a semi-presidential system!

48
Q

MEASURES OF PRESIDENTIAL POWER

A
  • Appointment powers: PM, ministers, judges, central bank chief, security
    council, senior officers, senior commanders
  • Legislative powers: calls referenda, issues decrees, issues emergency ordinances, can call special sessions of parliament, can dissolve parliament or call elections, can propose legislation
  • Executive powers: Commander in chief of armed forces, may convene and participate in cabinet sessions; prepares and submits budget
  • Judicial standing: can send laws to Constitutional Court, can annul acts of other bodies, can issue emergency decrees
49
Q
  • Three types of social science theories
A
  • 1) structural: focus on features of society as a whole; cultural, economic,
    geographic theories
  • 2) institutional: focus on rules and procedures and their effects on political
    outcomes
  • 3) voluntarist: focus on individual actors/leaders
50
Q

what kind of social science theory is the pres. vs parl debate a part of

A

Institutional

51
Q

PROBLEMS WITH PRESIDENTIALISM

A

LINZ!!!!

  • Winner-takes-all: electoral politics is high-stakes zero-sum game– losers in a presidential race do not have
    a stake in the system and consequently may reject the system (democracy) as a whole
  • Competing claims to legitimacy: exacerbated under divided government (when president lacks majority in
    legislature) can lead to permanent executive/legislative conflict, ineffective govt, severe institutional crisis
    and jeopardize democratic rule
  • Rigidity of fixed terms: fixed presidential term limits + unpopular president = lame duck effect, paralyzed
    government, political instability & crisis
  • Aggrandizement of presidents
52
Q

Linz argues parliamentarism is better for democratic regime stability?

A

*Power concentrated in the legislature where power can be shared by several parties, politics less of a zero-sum game
* No fixed term in office, no lame duck effect
* Government instability is possible, but it is not the same as regime instability

53
Q

DEFENSE OF PRESIDENTIALISM

A

SHUGART
AND MAINWARING!!!

  • Accountability to voters (Directly elected executive responsible to voters; Congressional independence in legislative matters may produce better legislation)
  • Stronger guarantees against majority tyranny and nuanced choices for voters
    (Divided govt provides checks and balances, prevents one party dominance, voters can split the ticket)
  • Smaller likelihood of extreme cabinet instability (less frequent collapses of government)
  • Smaller likelihood of disproportionate influence of extreme ideological parties
    (in parliamentary systems such parties may be crucial coalition partners)
54
Q

DRAWBACKS OF PARLIAMENTARISM

A
  • Parliamentarism also has competing claims to legitimacy– president vs. PM,
    upper vs lower house; minority govts
  • Winner-takes-all depends not on parliamentarism vs presidentialism, but on electoral rules and party systems. Party systems with high levels of discipline
    basically provide unconstrained PMs.
  • PMs can aggrandize just as effectively as presidents– Orban in Hungary, Modi in India.
  • Parliamentarism has a better record only because of self-selection
55
Q

LEGISLATIVE ELECTIONS 3 elements

A

District size (i.e. how many
people are elected)
- Ballot structure (how do
people vote)
- Electoral formula (how are
votes translated into seats)

56
Q

3 typical sizes of districts

A

Single-member districts (ridings in Canada, Congressional seats in the US)
-Multi-member districts (most countries using proportional representation)
-One district for the entire country (few examples)

57
Q

Two consequences of electoral systems

A

Immediate
-Electoral outcomes
Indirect
- Democratic representation

58
Q

Electoral outcomes

A

Number of parties
Turnout
Representation of women and racial minorities

59
Q

Democratic
representation

A

Responsiveness
Accountability
Citizens’ satisfaction

60
Q

TYPES OF PARTIES

A

Charismatic
Clientelist
Programmatic
EiltevsMass
Catch all
Electoral professional
Cartel
Business firm
Social movement

61
Q
  • Why do voters need parties?
A

Information short-cut

62
Q

Why do candidates need parties?

A
  • Organizational support
  • Name recognition
  • Material resources for campaign
63
Q

Why do democracies need parties, especially programmatic ones?

A
  • Without parties huge uncertainty at each election (what policies is the new incumbent
    going to pursue?)
  • Without parties, harder for voters to hold politicians accountable, because they’d need to collect a lot of info about behavior of politicians in office
  • Greater probability of anti-systemic figure coming to power
  • Parties condense myriad of possible issue conflicts into a manageable set of policy choices.
64
Q

Party systems

A
  • Two-party systems
  • Dominant party systems
  • Multi-party systems
65
Q

Strong political party system:

A
  • All politicians belong to parties
  • Well-developed grass-roots party organizations
  • High ideological cohesiveness in each party
  • Whole party system well organized around cleavages, leftright
  • High levels of party ID
  • Low electoral volatility
  • High party discipline in parliament
66
Q

POPULIST PARTIES

A
  • Mudde’s definition of populism: “Thin-centered ideology that considers society to be ultimately separated into two homogeneous and antagonistic camps, “the pure people” versus “the corrupt elite,” and which argues that politics should be an expression of the volonté générale (general will) of the people”
  • Context-dependent ideology; the icons of populism are of local, not universal appeal; some context-specific incarnations: agrarian populism, socio-economic populism, xenophobic populism
67
Q

HOW CONSTITUTIONS ARE WRITTEN

A

Constitutional assemblies: A gathering of people – usually elected by citizens and often representative of society in some way – to write a constitution.

68
Q

ANATOMY OF A CONSTITUTION

A

Preamble: States the values of a society and often, the reasons
for writing the constitution.
* Structure: Defines the powers of government (for instance, a
bicameral Legislature, a single Executive, and a judiciary).
* Bills of Rights: Lists the rights that citizens hold (which also
serves the purpose of clarifying things government cannot do.

69
Q

THE ROLE(S) OF COURTS

A
  • Criminal cases
  • Civil disputes (often commercial)
  • Small claims or traffic violations
  • Disputes between families
  • Patents
  • Disputes between people and the state (administrative)
  • Constitutional controversies
70
Q

Common law

A

Professional judiciary
* Case law
* One court hierarchy
* Judge-made law

71
Q

Civil Law

A

Bureaucratic judiciary
* Codification
* Parallel court hierarchies
* Legislative supremacy

72
Q

FIRST CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS

A

1920: Austria creates the first Constitutional Court in the world; creator,
University of Vienna law professor Hans Kelsen; he became a judge on the
court, but was removed in 1930 for being too liberal on divorce (he was a
social-dem); court suspended in 1934; Kelsen moved to Cologne; finished
career at Berkeley

73
Q

After WW2 what did people realized democracy needed

A

a backstop and it being constitutional courts

74
Q

Functions of constitutional courts

A
  • Judicial review
  • Rights protection
  • Balancing powers
  • Advisory review
75
Q

Internal limitations of courts

A

The rules judges follow when issuing decisions, e.g. judicial method
* Having to give reasons in deciding is a big check

76
Q

EXTERNAL
LIMITATIONS of courts

A

-Judicial independence varies around the world
-Low judicial independence: from politicians, from rich
plaintiffs
-High judicial independence: from politicians, from
plaintiffs, from public opinion.
-Even in independent courts, judges still have to keep an
eye on politicians and public opinion, lest their decisions
cause a backlash.

77
Q

Party

A

enduring association of people who identify themselves by a public label and who are joined
together under this label for the primary purpose of winning control of government by means of
presenting their own candidates in elections for public office on the basis of a common platform

78
Q

functions of a constitution

A

1) representing the values of a society
2) defining and organizing the powers of government
3) defining the rights of citizens

79
Q

WHAT IS THE RULE OF LAW

A

Equal responsibility and protection under the law

Governments should be limited by prospective, publicly-promulgated, and universal laws

Proscription of extra-legal punishment

Predictable and efficient implementation of laws on the books (though predictable applies to predictably impartial implementation, not to predictably corrupt implementation of
laws).

80
Q

Rule of law for economy

A
  • Rule of law facilitates protection of property rights from encroachment by
    state or competitors
  • Stable property rights facilitate long-term investment
  • Higher rates of investment facilitate economic growth
  • Sustained economic growth leads to development
81
Q

Rule of law for justice

A
  • Rule of law enhances social predictability
  • Liberals like predictability because it enhances individuals’
    autonomy
  • Communitarians like predictability because it fosters community’s stability
  • Predictability is the reason why citizens join a state; otherwise the state of nature would be preferable, because in it individuals have unbridled freedom.
82
Q

Rule of law for democracy

A
  • Democratic regime requires participation and contestation.
  • Both require fundamental political and civil rights such as freedom of assembly, freedom of speech, and right to stand in election.
  • Rule of law is more likely to guarantee respect for these rights by the state or powerful private actors.
  • Thus, rule of law fosters or deepens democracy
83
Q

Democracy Minimalist definition (Przeworski)

A
  • uncertain and irreversible election outcome
  • repeated elections
84
Q

Maximalist definition (Rueschemeyer)

A
  • socioeconomic equality
85
Q

Mid-way definition (Huntington)

A
  • Fair
  • Honest
  • Periodic
  • Competitive
  • Universal suffrage
  • Freedom of assembly and freedom of speech