Midterm Flashcards
What are the 7 minimal requirements of an Evangelical Systematic Theology?
- A knowledge of sources, being the Scriptures.
- A commitment to the inerrancy of the Scriptures.
- Skill in theological method.
- Humility concerning human limitations due to creation and the Fall.
- Obedience to the Scriptures by the Holy Spirit.
- Commitment to study as hard work and a ministry to Christ for the Church.
- Completeness because Systematic Theology is by nature unabridged.
Define Systematic Theology.
Systematic Theology is the science of God in His works which lends itself to producing doctrines from the facts of the Bible and interrelates them into a coherent and consistent system.
What are the 4 basic presuppositions of Systematic Theology?
- A belief in the veracity of the Bible.
- A normal, inductive approach to hermeneutics: That is, historical, grammatical, literal, and literary.
- A text rightly understood in its context is a sufficient basis for doctrine.
- The study of the Bible gives the Christian basic presuppositions and enough data to make a coherent theological system.
What are the 5 factors that apply in seeing if the Bible is being studied in a normal way?
- Proper grammatical, historical, and theological contexts of each passage considered.
- Basis of a passage’s interpretation is in the text itself, not primarily in the subjective experiences of the interpreter.
- Symbolic language and figures of speech are to be acknowledged in the Bible in the same way as they are in everyday communication; Not a “hidden meaning” license.
- Allegorical interpretation is rejected.
- Typological interpretation only used when the Bible itself affirms them or are self-evident.
Name the 4 implications of a literal interpretation of the Bible.
- OT promises cannot be deleted, replaced, or changed by some “deeper meaning” in the NT, although the NT can enhance or add to these promises.
- There is a distinction between Israel and the Church in their divergent plans, although they share some common blessings.
- The literal Second coming of Jesus Christ before a literal and political millennial kingdom on earth.
- The doctrine of pre-tribulation rapture of the Church is in harmony with the literal interpretation and with the distinction between Israel and the Church.
What are the 8 distinctions between Biblical and Systematic Theology?
- Bible is the only source (BT) v. using Bible as filter for sources even outside the Bible (ST).
- Categories from text (BT) v. categories from text, and inferences, and correlation (ST).
- Emphasizes distinctions (BT) v. harmony (ST).
- Immediate context prime (BT) v. overall context of whole Bible (ST).
- Foundation is exegesis and hermeneutics (BT) v. Biblical Theology and sound Theological Method (ST).
- Perspective is Biblical principles (BT) v. today’s world. (ST).
- Does not emphasize present-day application of Biblical principles (BT) v. doing so (ST).
- Purely historical (BT) v. Historical Philosophical (ST).
What are the 10 categories in Systematic Theology and their definitions?
- Bibliology: Study of the biblical teachings about the Bible.
- Theology Proper: Study of the biblical teachings about the work, nature, and decrees of God.
- Christology: The study of the biblical teachings about the person of Christ.
- Pneumatology: The study of the biblical teachings about the person of the Holy Spirit.
- Angelology: The study of the biblical teachings about angels and fallen angels.
- Anthropology: The study of the biblical teachings about creation and the nature of man.
- Harmartiology: The study of the biblical teachings about sin, the fall of man and angels.
- Soteriology: The study of the biblical teachings about the work of Christ and how it’s applied to the believer.
- Ecclesiology: The study of the biblical teachings about the nature of the universal and local church.
- Eschatology: The study of the biblical teachings about the last, being future, things.
What are Erickson’s 10 steps to developing an adequate theology?
- Collection of Biblical materials.
- Unification of Biblical materials.
- Analysis of the meaning Biblical teachings.
- Examination of historical treatments.
- Consultation of other cultural perspectives.
- Identification of the essence of the doctrine.
- Illumination from extrabiblical sources.
- Contemporary expression of the doctrine.
- Development of a central interpretive motif.
- Stratification of the topics.
Name 4 reasons people frequently reject Systematic Theology as a valid discipline.
- Enlightened suspicion of tradition and dogmatic theologies.
- Critical approach to Bible combined with evolutionary theory lead to view that there is no unity in the Bible.
- Irrelevant to today’s issues.
- Past abuse of proof texting.
What is the 4 purposes of Systematic Theology?
- Provides a theological interpretation of Scripture.
- Provides a unified understanding of Scripture.
- Provides doctrinal material for the church.
- Provides application in the life of the church.
What are the 4 general principles for “doing” Systematic Theology?
- Emphasize what the Bible emphasizes.
- Distinguish between the prescriptive versus the descriptive.
- Study in a balance way which unifies the Bible.
- When developing central doctrines, do 1 & 2 above, and assign the greatest weight of authority to (in this order): Direct statements, direct implications, inferences, inductive conclusions, deductive conclusions.
Discuss the 4 kinds of revelation as act.
- The appearances of God.
- Acts of verbal communication.
- Acts of God in creation and providence.
- Acts of God in history.
As far as revelation as act, name 4 types of “The appearances of God”.
- Theophanies, being visible indication of God’s presence.
- Visions.
- Incarnation (of Christ).
- Second coming of Christ.
How did Aquinas influence revelation?
Reason can lead a person to the knowledge of God, but not salvation, which is based on faith. Good in that it considered classic arguments and emphasized the infallibility of Scripture. Problem was that this did not account for man’s fallen state and its effect on reason and reason only led people to a god, not Christ specifically.
How did Hume influence revelation?
The Bible is useless and there is no special or general revelation.
How did Kant influence revelation?
No direct revelation of God, no actual way of knowing because we only know things through the preorganized structures in our mind.
How did Barth influence revelation?
No general revelation and Bible is NOT revelation, but only a record of revelation.
What are the 5 models of revelation?
- Propositional, revelation as doctrine.
- Historical, revelation as history.
- Encounter, revelation as dialectic.
- Encounter, revelation as inner experience.
- Encounter, revelation as new awareness.
Define revelation.
Both the act of God by which he has made known to men a knowledge of Himself, His works, and His will and the resultant content of that knowledge.
Define general revelation.
The active manifestations of God to the perception and consciousness of all men which come to them in the constitution of the human mind and conscience, the whole frame work of the created order, and in the course of God’s providential government.
Define special revelation.
The acts of God by which he has disclosed to various men in history a propositional and personal knowledge of Himself, His works, His will through various means and the resultant content of that knowledge which now constitutes the Scripture.
What are the two main categories of Post-Enlightenment theories of revelation?
Theories that emphasize the source of inspiration and ones that emphasize the result of inspiration.
What are the 3 main post-enlightenment theories of revelation that focus on the source of inspiration?
- Natural inspiration: Bible comes from human insight, making it fine literature…
- Mystical inspiration: Bible can be used to experience revelation, illuminated by a religious consciousness.
- Functional inspiration: Bible functions in an inspired way, but is not actually inspired in its content.
What are the 6 main post-enlightenment theories of revelation that focus on the result of inspiration?
- Mechanical dictation: God dictates, men write.
- Partial inspiration: Some content is inspired, some not, some more, some less.
- Conceptual inspiration: Concepts and ideas are inspired, but not the actual words.
- Limited inerrancy: All is inspired, but not necessarily true and error-free.
- Verbal inspiration: When the word of man encounters the Word of God, it can sometimes become the Word of God.
- Verbal plenary inspiration: Bible is both and wholly a human and a divine book.
Functionally, what are the 4 views of the Bible?
- Wholly human book
- Wholly divine book
- Partially divine book.
- Both and wholly a human and a divine book.
Name and explain 3 passages in the Bible that address its own inspiration.
- 2 Timothy 3:14-17: All of Scripture is from God.
- 2 Peter 1:16-21: Prophecy in Scripture is spoken by men but still from God and controlled by the Holy Spirit.
- 1 Corinthians 2:10-13: Revelation has come from the Holy Spirit through the Apostles.