Midterm 1 (Final) Flashcards
Why do we define mental illness/why do we diagnose?
- Knowing what the issue is makes it easier to treat it
- Helps with self-stigmatization (explains behaviour to the individual and provides clarity)
- Can standardize treatments so everyone with that illness gets the same treatment
- Can help others understand how to interact with an individual who is mentally ill
What are arguments against defining mental illness or diagnosing?
- Some think it stigmatizes people
- Some believe it removes the individuality of mentally ill people and “puts them in a box”
- It can be difficult to arbitrate what is and what isn’t mental illness
What’s the DSM?
- Diagnostic and Statistical Manual
- Manual in North America that we use to define and classify mental disorders
What are the purposes of a classification system?
- Description: highlight critical features of a diagnosis -> ex: what are the important symptoms of schizophrenia?
- Prediction: may tell you something about course, treatment response, etiology
- Theory: Provides a set of postulates about relationships of different elements to one another (important for research into psychopathology)
- Communication: for example between clinicians (you want every clinician to have the same definition of different disorders)
What are the limitations of a classification system?
- Loss of Uniqueness: diagnosis implies that common features are more important than the ways in which individuals vary
- Difficulty of boundary cases: what do you do about the people who are on the boundary? Do we arbitrarily decide which group they’re more similar to?
- Ex: similar to procrustean beds -> we fit people into the diagnosis rather than fit the diagnosis to the people in front of us
What are categorical systems?
- Identifies the presence/absence of a disorder -> you either have the disorder or you don’t (you’re anxious or you’re not)
- Advantageous for research and understanding
- Simplifies communication (provides a lot of info relatively quickly)
- Natural preference among people to employ categories in speech (heuristics)
- Categories better-suited for clinical decision-making (Hospitalize or don’t? Treat or don’t?)
- Cutoffs in categorical system tend to magnify small differences
What are dimensional systems?
- Rank on a continuous quantitative dimension
- Degree to which a symptom is present
- Ex: how anxious are you on a scale of 1-10?
- May better capture an individual’s functioning
- Everybody falls somewhere
- Arbitrary cut-offs
- Proposes thresholds for diagnoses
- Preserves more info
- Greater reliability: inter-rater, test re-test
Describe the invention of the DSM
- DSM I was first introduced in 1952
- The 1st and 2nd DSM were very similar
- First attempts to standardize definitions of psychopathology
- People were trying to establish a scientifically grounded shared set of definitions for psychopathology
- With standardized definitions you can determine how common or rare something is (ex: a behaviour)
Describe the DSM-II
- 1968
- Very similar to DSM-I
- Few categories
- No requirements for # of symptoms
- Psychoanalysis was the dominant paradigm
Describe the DSM-III
- 1980
- Demand for a more biological, empirical approach
- Inclusion Criteria: What symptoms do you need to have, and how many?
- Duration Criteria: How long do you need to exhibit these symptoms?
- Exclusion Criteria: What symptoms rule out a diagnosis?
- Multi-Axial Classification
How are disorders in the DSM determined?
Often these diagnoses are determined by a small group of experts determining a consensus on definitions of disorders and their validity
What’s the Multi-Axial Classification?
- Axis I (first axis you use). Major Clinical Disorders (ex: MDD, PTSD)
- Axis II. Personality Disorders (ex: BPD, NPD)
- Axis III. Medical conditions that might contribute or be relevant to treatment
- Axis IV. Psychosocial Stressors (something with which to record environmental contexts) -> may interfere with treatment
- Axis V. Global Assessment Functioning (GAF) –> a simple rating of function/summary score for severity
- The primary problem would always be if someone has an Axis 1 problem and Axis 2 was used after to determine if using the right treatment
Describe the differences in the number of diagnostic categories per edition of DSM
- Large difference between DSM-I and DSM-II (~75 more)
- Large difference between DSM-II and DSM-III (~80 more)
- Smaller difference between DSM-III and DSM-III-R (~30 more)
- Even smaller difference between DSM-III-R and DSM-IV-TR (5 more)
- Less categories in DSM-5 than in DSM-IV-TR (140 less)
What are the assumptions that were introduced in DSM-III?
- Symptoms are the most useful basis for assessment
- Nosology based primarily on behavior and symptoms and not on etiology
- Beforehand it was focused on etiology
- Locus of pathology is in the individual (not the system that the individual is a part of)
Describe the DSM-IV
- 1994
- Didn’t make a lot of changes
- Introduced “clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning”
Describe the DSM-IV-TR
- 2000
- DMS-4-TEXT REVISION
- The revision process of this one was much more public and research-based
- Did not introduce new diagnoses or specific criteria
- Provided more info on each diagnosis
- Provided a broad definition of mental illness
Describe the DSM-5
- 2013
- Removed multi-axial system
- Introduced dimensional assessment criteria for some diagnoses (spectrum of varying degrees of a disorder)
- Re-classified some disorders (ex: OCD and PTSD no longer classified as anxiety disorders)
- Removed others
What are some challenges to the categorical classification system?
- Heterogeneity
- Comorbidity
Describe the heterogeneity challenge to the categorical classification system
- Ex: if depression is in one category and anxiety is in a different one then we would assume that people within each category look like one another and different from the people in the other categories
- However we find heterogeneity in some of these categories
- Different people with the same diagnosis will look differently
Describe the comorbidity challenge to the categorical classification system
- Comorbidity: simultaneous presentation of more than one disease
- Ex: MDD and Anxiety are often comorbid
- If someone presents with more than one diagnosis, do you treat both simultaneously or on a case by case basis
Describe comorbidity
- For people who currently meet criteria for one disorder, 50% qualify for more than one and over the course of their lifetime 75%
- Comorbidity is the norm (suggests the categories are probably not working that well)
- Comorbidity affects course, development, presentation, treatment response, severity of the symptoms, etc.
- Comorbid patients tend to have poorer outcomes (ex: short lives and poor quality of life)
- Not accounting for comorbidity can lead to a lack of info in understanding a patient’s condition
- Most people with MDD also have a comorbidity
- Research Implications: anything you find to be associated with one disorder may actually be a result of the comorbid disorder
What are some reasons for why comorbidity exists?
- Chance
- Sampling bias
- Problems with diagnostic criteria
- Poorly-drawn diagnostic boundaries
- Causal explanation
- Shared etiological risk factors
Explain why chance is a reason for why comorbidity exists
- Some comorbidity is just chance
- Ex: odds of MDD for adult females = 20%
- Ex: odds of anxiety disorder for adult females = 20%
- By chance alone, 4% will have both
Explain why sampling bias is a reason for why comorbidity exists
- Each disorder associated with a chance of being treated
- Individuals with more disorders (more severe individuals) are more likely to seek treatment
- Clinical samples = likely biased samples
- But, we find high rates of comorbidity in community samples as well -> not just clinical samples
- Sampling bias doesn’t account for all
Explain why problems with diagnostic criteria is a reason for why comorbidity exists
- Many criterion sets overlap (same symptoms appear in different disorder sets)
- Ex: Suicidal ideation in MDD, Schiz, BPD, AUD, SUD
- Ex: Sleeplessness in MDD and GAD & Worry in GAD and MDD
- Can’t totally account for high rates of comorbidity
Explain why poorly-drawn diagnostic boundaries is a reason for why comorbidity exists
- Multiformity (disorders can express themselves in multiple ways)
- People with MDD frequently have panic attacks -> if only looking at panic attacks, you may assume someone with MDD has panic disorder
- Comorbid disorders may reflect a 3rd, independent
disorder
Explain why a causal explanation is a reason for why comorbidity exists
- One disorder is a risk factor for another disorder
- Ex: Conduct Disorder may lead to adult Substance Use Disorder
Explain why shared etiological risk factors is a reason for why comorbidity exists
- Etiology: origins of disorder
- Childhood maltreatment is a risk factor for almost every disorder
- Biological commonalities can also be risk factors -> not much research on this
Describe the Dimensional/Hierarchical Models of pathology
- Tom Achenbach conducted a factory analysis to see which symptoms or diagnoses clump together (share a variance) and which don’t, to try to identify factors
- In this system you have 2 factors -> internalizing and externalizing
- These are distinct and relatively independent but correlate within themselves
- He believed that this explains comorbidity (what are the factors that explain the similarities within diagnostic categories)
- Internalizing: people that cause distress to themselves
- Externalizing: people that cause distress to others
Describe the internalizing factor of the dimensional/hierarchical models
- Split in 2 sub-categories: Anxious misery and fear
- Anxious misery is comprised of MDD and GAD
- Fear is comprised of Panic and Social Phobia
Describe the externalizing factor of the dimensional/hierarchical models
- Split in 2 sub-categories: addiction and aggression
- Addiction is comprised of Alcohol Abuse and Drug Dependence
- Aggression is comprised of ODD and CD
What are some problems with the dimensional/hierarchical models of pathology?
○ There are more disorders that don’t fit in these models
- Internalizing and Externalizing forms of dysfunction often correlate with themselves
Describe the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP)
- The most recent way of thinking about these hierarchical ways of describing psychopathology
- Introduced a thought disorder category
- Included some personality disorders
- Method used for this is factory analysis
- This isn’t a causal model, it’s just describing the structure of psychopathology
Describe RDoC (Research Domain Criteria)
- Funding initiative
- Wanted to forget diagnoses altogether and focus on dysfunctions of core systems since many disorders can fit into these
- Trans-diagnostic approach
- This isn’t used for treatment this is just used for research on descriptions
What’s prevalence?
- % of people in a population with a disorder at a
particular point in time - Ex: past month, year, or lifetime
- Prevalence = incidence x chronicity
What’s incidence?
- % of people who develop a disorder for the 1st time during a specific time period
- 1st onset cases
What’s a risk factor?
- For epidemiologists, a correlate (most often demographic variables) associated with different disorders
- Psychologists use this term to mean predictor, or cause (should not be a causality)
Describe the relativity of the 1-year prevalence rates of the different psychological disorders (highest to lowest)
- SAD (6.8% -> highest prevalence rate)
- MDD (6.7% -> close 2nd highest)
- PTSD (3.5% -> 3rd highest (Half less than SAD & MDD)
- GAD (3.1% -> close 4th)
- Panic (2.7% -> close 5th)
- Bipolar (2.6% -> close 6th)
- Persistent Depressive Disorder (1.5%)
- OCD (1% -> lowest prevalence rate)
Describe the relativity of the onset of the different psychological disorders (youngest to oldest)
- PTSD (any age)
- OCD (child/adolescent)
- SAD (13)
- Major Depression (14-15 or 30s)
- Panic (24)
- Bipolar (25)
- Persistent Depressive Disorder (30s)
- GAD (31)
Describe the relativity of the lifetime prevalence rates between mood disorders, anxiety disorders, substance use disorders and any disorder (highest to lowest)
- Any disorder (46%, almost 1/2 -> highest) -> 46% will meet criteria of a DMS diagnosis within their lifetime
- Anxiety disorders (27% -> 2nd highest)
- Mood disorder (21%, about 1/5)
- Substance use disorders (15% -> lowest)
Describe the relativity of the 1-year prevalence rates for 19-25 yr old college (CS) & non-college students (NCS) for mental health usage, mood disorders, anxiety disorders, substance use disorders and any disorder
- Any disorder: CS = 45.8% and NCS = 47.7% (higher for NCS)
- Anxiety disorder: CS = 11.9% and NCS = 12.7% (higher for NCS)
- Mood disorder: CS = 10.6% and NCS = 11.9% (higher for NCS)
- Alcohol Use Disorder: CS = 20.4% and NCS = 17% (higher for CS)
- Mental Health Usage: CS = 18.5% and NCS = 21.5% (higher for NCS)
What’s etiology?
- The scientific study of the causes of things
- Etiology of mental disorders -> why do people become mentally ill, what are the causes?
What are etiological perspectives on psychopathology?
- Environmental causes
- Genetics causes
- Diathesis-Stress Model
- Vulnerability-stress correlations
- Developmental pathways (equifinality and multi finality)
What are some environmental causes of psychopathology?
*Environmental/ learning experiences
*Freudian theories:
- “schizophrenogenic mother” -> popular in the 40s-70s , the idea that a mother that often switches between being overbearing and neglectful can cause schizophrenia
- “refrigerator mother” -> idea that a mother that lacked genuine warmth and positivity caused autism
What are some genetic causes of psychopathology?
- Genes are not deterministic -> most are probabilistic (if your family is tall, you’re more likely to be tall)
- Make small contributions (with other genes) to create the ultimate outcome
- Single gene association doesn’t exist (ex: “this is the gene for schizophrenia”
- Researchers identifying dozens of genes that, in certain combinations, lead to symptoms of different forms of psychopathology
- Polygenic - influenced by activity of many genes -> How many genes you have determines where you fall on dimension/spectrum
- There’s strong evidence of psychopathology running in the family -> MDD in the family could make someone more likely to get MDD
- No mental illness to this day is perfectly heritable
Describe the Diathesis-Stress model
- Diathesis model tries to drop the nature vs nurture debate, it’s trying to bring these ideas together (gene-environment correlation)
- The diathesis is a vulnerability or predisposition to develop psychopathology
- Stress is exposure to experiences or things that overwhelm an organism
- Only when both stress and diathesis is present that one becomes mentally ill (not when stress absent/diathesis present, stress absent/diathesis absent or stress present/diathesis absent)
Describe the reworking of the Diathesis-Stress model
- Etiological heterogeneity
- Assumes diathesis and stress are independent
- Say that it’s not do you have the diathesis or stress or do you not, now it’s to what degree do you have either or?
- Now, no diathesis is not perfectly protective -> people without a diathesis that are exposed to high levels of stress could develop a disorder
Describe vulnerability-stress correlations
- Often non-independent in important ways
- Stress Generation -> ex: excessive reassurance seeking
- “Scars” as vulnerability -> ex: cognitive vulnerabilities following MDD episode
- Vulnerability may shape perception of the stress
- Stress can influence the development of the diathesis -> ex: gestational stress (can change brain development that can make people more vulnerable to developing psychopathology) and mental illness
- It’s not just exposure to stress that leads to depression, people that have depression behave in ways that leads to more stress
- Parents that have a genetic risk for externalizing behaviours pass that onto their children but they may also through their parenting create externalizing behaviours in a child
- Dynamic relationship with lots of correlation
What’s equifinality?
- Final common pathway
- People who get a disorder, get it from different causes
- Getting to the same point from many different pathways
- Equifinality explains how multiple different pathways converge on the same point
- Most disorders that we encounter are representative of equifinality
What’s multifinality?
- Final different pathways
- A single risk factor can lead to many outcomes
- Ex: experiences of child abuse are associated with almost all forms of psychopathology
What are some challenges to the reworking of the Diathesis-Stress model
- There’s not just a single etiological pathway
- We have a lot of evidence for gene environment correlations showing these are not independent of one another
What are the different types of longitudinal designs?
- Retrospective
- Follow-up
- High Risk
Describe the retrospective longitudinal design
- A study that looks back into history
- Collect a sample of people with a disorder
- Try to determine what factors preceded the onset of the disorder
- Data collected through self-reports and existing archival data (looking at home videos or school reports to identify abnormalities -> ex: when looking at home videos of schizophrenic individuals, people could identify motor abnormalities that could predict schizophrenia)
Describe the main limitation with retrospective longitudinal designs
- Problem with relying on recall
- Memory is not always accurate
- Mood states can affect the way people recall things (depressive episodes can lead to people reporting things more negatively)
Describe the follow-up studies longitudinal design
- Follow people with the disorder over time
- See what happens to them (trying to observe the course of the disorder overtime)
- Already-ill sample
- Difficult to derive etiological explanations
Describe the high risk studies longitudinal design
- Variant of follow-up
- Identify people who are likely to develop a disorder
- Ex: offspring of people with a disorder (genetic), biological abnormality, behavioural variable
- Follow them over time (prospective longitudinal study)
- This is difficult because you need a very large sample to be able to make statistical inferences
- More statistical power when using people who are more likely to develop a disorder for sample
- These are powerful designs but there are a lot of challenges
Describe the limitations of high risk studies
- Genetic: Need to find people who have the disorder and also have children (people with schizophrenia often don’t have offspring)
- Biological: associations not well-proven
- Behaviors: may be a risk factor, or may be early manifestation of the disease
- If you recruit the offspring of someone with a disorder, you may not have a representative sample
- It’s hard to get someone to come to the lab, let alone a person and their child
- These studies are uncommon because they’re hard to do and are expensive
What are the characteristics of a vulnerability marker?
- Should be trait-like, not state-related
- If a marker only appears when people are ill, then it isn’t a vulnerability marker (it should be present before the illness, during and after)
- Ex: negative attribution bias as vulnerability marker, you would want to see this before the disorder, during episodes of depression, and after
- Has to be correlated with the disorder, but has to persist beyond the end of the episode -> if a marker isn’t evident prior but persists after the offset of a disorder, this could be considered a scar -> not considered a vulnerability marker
- Has to be present in a high-risk population (not a vulnerability marker if it’s not present in people who are at higher risk for developing it)
- Has to pre-date disorder
What’s case control?
- Compare one group of people with disorder to a second group without the disorder
- Case control tends to be most informative and useful if you’re looking at a disorder that’s rare because you have to recruit a lot of people
What’s a cohort?
- A single large sample of people, some of whom have the disorder
- Cohort is preferable when the disorder is not that rare because you can compare your control group to multiple groups of people with different disorders
Describe the patients vs community issue with psychopathology
- Patient populations not representative of people with the disorder in the community -> a lot of people don’t seek treatment so patient populations aren’t very representative
- Clinical populations tend to be more severe, have more comorbidities, more likely to be female (women are more likely to seek treatment than men), higher SES, chronic -> represent people seeking treatment
- General population, get a sense of disorder “in the wild” -> general population tend to be milder and lead to misdiagnosis
- Very expensive (because large samples)
- We need info from both designs
What are controls?
- Healthy Controls (HC): often “super healthy controls” because this group is a smaller % of the population because most people at some point in their life will meet criteria for a psychiatric dysfunction
- Psychiatric Controls (PC): people from a psychiatric population with a different disorder
What’s genetic epidemiology?
Trying to understand to what extent there are genetic contributions to pathology
What are family studies?
- Does the disorder run in families? If not, then no genetic contribution
- Why does it run in families?
- First identify proband (someone that has the disorder)
- Assess family members to see who in the family also has a disorder
- Interview -> Family Study
- Informant report -> Family History Study
- Many disorders run in families -> rates of illness in family members of the proband must be higher than in general population (or of family members of the controls) to state that the depression runs in the family
- Subthreshold/symptoms -> family members may show symptoms but not have the disorder (ex: we don’t inherit the disorders but we inherit the traits that make us vulnerable to these like magical thinking or paranoia
- Coaggregation: if looking at depression in a proband, their family will not only have higher rates of depression but also of anxiety disorders than in the general population (depression and anxiety tend to coaggregate together)
- Suggest genetic role, does not prove it (because family members are similar to one another due to shared experiences, environments and culture)
What are adoption studies?
- Natural experiment (observation of people already in these situations) attempting to isolate the effect of genes on psychopathology
- Parent as proband
- Adoptee as proband
- Cross-fostering design
- Typically we want to look at parental psychopathology in these studies
Describe the cross-fostering design in adoption studies
Children of parents without schizophrenia adopted into a household of parents with schizophrenia and children of parents with schizophrenia adopted into a household of parents without schizophrenia -> which of these groups is at a higher risk of developing schizophrenia
Describe the parent as proband design in adoption studies
- Group of parents, some of whom have the disorder and others who don’t all of which have given their children up for adoption
- The people who gave you your genes are not the ones that raised you -> removes the environmental and experience similarities
Describe the adoptee as proband design in adoption studies
Track down and assist the biological and the adoptive parents (ex: child has depression, are the biological or/and adoptive parents more at risk to develop depression?)
Describe the limitations to adoption studies
- Adoption is a rare event
- Adoptive parents are very carefully screened -> typically not allowed to adopt a child if you have a history of psychopathology
- Creates an unrepresentative sample for these studies
What’s fear?
- Response to a current present threat -> real or perceived
- Something that is either present or is perceived to be in the presence of the person
- Fear response: response to keep us safe from threats (to enable fight or flight)
- Fear is fast (rapid fear response)
- This response is not necessarily mediated by conscious thought -> immediate physiological and behavioural response
- The fear is to the present object
- Usually calms down pretty quickly once the stimuli is removed
- Physiological responses -> all thought to emerge to aid the organism in surviving when encountering a threat
- Fear response exists/evolved to keep us safe (it’s our friend)
- Preparation for adaptive action
- The neural systems that allow us to see danger are very primitive and fast -> when using these systems, you’re not differentiating between dangerous animals and non-dangerous animals (ex: you don’t have time to differentiate between a tarantula and a non-dangerous spider)
What are the physiological responses related to fear?
- Increased heart rate
- Blood pressure increases
- Increases in hormones like cortisol and adrenaline
- Muscle tension
- Increased breathing rate
- Etc.
What’s panic?
- Extreme fear response that is evoked even if there’s no threat
- False alarm -> there is no threat present
- Activates a very powerful fear response
- Physiological components are similar to fear
What are the physiological responses related to panic?
- Increased heart rate
- Blood pressure increases
- Increases in hormones like cortisol and adrenaline
- Muscle tension
- Increased breathing rate
- Etc.
What’s anxiety?
- Future oriented (affective state where someone feels a threat from a potential outcome in the future)
- May have some of the same symptoms as fear and panic
- In the absence of a current threat (threat is not actually present)
- Anxiety disorders are disorders of anxiety and panic -> disorders in which fear anxiety and panic reach a level where they interfere with the individual’s ability to live a valued life
- Fear is our friend, but anxiety is a maladaptation of our fear response
What’s the difference between panic and anxiety?
Anxiety is much more future oriented and the physiological response is usually less intense than with panic
What’s the prevalence of anxiety disorders?
As a class, among the most common psychological disorders (lifetime prevalence of around 30-40%)
In the DSM-5, anxiety-related disorders are categorized into what 3 distinct chapters?
- Anxiety disorders (panic disorder, agoraphobia, specific phobia, social anxiety disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder)
- Obsessive-Compulsive and related disorders (OCD)
- Trauma and stressor-related disorders (PTSD)
- These groupings (3 chapters) are meant to reflect the connections between the disorders -> in terms of functionality or treatments
- OCD and PTSD used to be in the same chapter as the anxiety disorders -> in DSM-5 they are separated
What are the internalizing disorders according to HiTOP?
- Bipolar I & II
- MDD
- Dysthymia
- GAD
- PTSD
- Social phobia
- Agoraphobia
- SAD
- Panic disorder
- OCD
- Specific phobia
- BPD
- Eating disorders
- Sexual problems
What are the fear disorders according to HiTOP?
- Social phobia
- Agoraphobia
- Specific phobia
- SAD
- Panic disorder
- OCD
What are the distress disorders according to HiTOP?
- MDD
- Dysthymia
- GAD
- PTSD
- BPD
- The ways these are alike each other is more important than how they are related to others
What are twin studies?
- Monozygotic (Mz) twins: twins that are genetically identical (identical twins)
- Dizygotic (Dz) twins: twins that share on average 50% of their genes
- Are monozygotic twins more similar with disorders vs dizygotic twins?
- With these groups you can control for other factors since they have the same experiences, age and environments
- Heritability estimates can vary from 0 to 1
- A = Additive Genetic Component -> how much more alike are monozygotic than dizygotic twins
- C = Common Environment Component -> how much are they alike across both types of twins (because they share an environment, they are more alike)
- E = Unique Environment -> how much does each twin differ from one another due to unique environmental factors/experiences
What are the heritability estimates found in twin studies?
- A= 2(rMZ – rDz) -> magnitude of the correlation
- MZ concordance = 50%
- Dz concordance = 25%
- Difference (D) = 25%
- 2D = 50%
- Sample specific
- Heritability estimates differ according to the different environments
- Higher with less environmental variance
What are some problems with twin studies?
- The assumption underlying this study design is that the environment of MZ twins is as alike as that of DZ twins -> this is false since MZ twins may have an environment that’s even more alike
- MZ twins often share a placenta (shared placenta has implications for gene expressions over the lifetime, even at conception, the environment of MZ twins is more similar than DZ twins)
- MZ twins treated more similarly to one another
- Heritability = estimated genetic contributions to observed phenotype -> not deterministic (doesn’t tell us what causes the trait), they’re probabilistic
- Often don’t model G x E (don’t consider the environment that much)
What are Gene-Environment correlations (rGE)?
- Our genetic makeup is not independent of the environments that we experience throughout our lifetime
- Currently, all rGE attributed to G
- Have to be cautious when interpreting genetic contributions
What are the different types of Gene-Environment correlations (rGE)?
- Passive: the same people that give you your genes, are also often the ones that provide you with your early-rearing environment (can be addressed in adoption studies) -> passive because it doesn’t depend on what a child does (depends on parents)
- Active: people are not just passive perceptible of their environment, we behave in certain ways based on our genetic makeup, as kids grow older, they choose their environment (friend group) -> niche-picking
- Evocative (reactive): we are treated differently based on our genetic makeup, our genotype can determine the response that we elicit (ex: attractive people are treated differently than unattractive people and highly impulsive people often aggravate others which will lead to different responses from others)
- Active and evocative hard to measure –> need better understanding of how environment shapes traits
Describe the genetics of intelligence
- IQ is highly heritable: ~80%
- IQ also malleable -> Flynn effect (intelligence as measured by IQ tests increased across the 20th century, despite the tests getting harder overtime)
- Flynn effect occurs more in developing countries since access to education increases
- Higher IQ = seek out “more stimulating” environments -> are available w/ more development
Describe how heritability varies as a function of the environment
- Heritability of IQ increases across development (IQ in kid twins looks less heritable but more heritable when they’re older)
- Among affluent (wealthy) families in high SES environments, heritability of IQ estimated at 0.72 -> suggesting that genes are emitting a stronger influence in these more affluent environments
- Among less affluent families, little observed additive genetic influence (heritability of 0.10)
- Heritability of alcohol use for those residing
in a neighbourhood with 10 or more alcohol outlets was 74%, compared with 16% for
those in a neighbourhood with 0 outlets - Eating disorder symptoms show minimal heritability before puberty but significant genetic effects (greater than 50%) during and after puberty
- The environment in which you exist, influences the extent to which your genotype affects your phenotype
When we say something is heritable, do we know what’s the mode of transmission?
- No, it doesn’t necessarily mean that we have pinpointed the mode of transmission
- Difficulty of making the link from genotype to phenotype
Describe the Genotypes-Endophenotypes-Phenotypes relationship
- Difficulty of making the link from genotype to phenotype (genotype-phenotype gap) -> we often don’t know how the genotype leads to the phenotype
- Phenotypes are very complex phenomena, multiply-determined, often poorly defined (don’t have great boundaries to be defined properly)
- Endophenotype: intermediate step between microscopic genes and nerve cells and the experiential and psychological phenotype
What are the characteristics of endophenotypes?
- must segregate with illness in the population
- must be heritable
- must not be state-dependent (manifests whether illness is active or in remission)
- must co-segregate with illness within families
- must be present at a higher rate within affected families than in the population
- must be amenable to reliable measurement, and be specific to the illness of interest (almost never the case but this is the ideal criteria)
What are specific phobias?
- A circumscribed fear of a specific object or activity
- Phobia is not just a fear (ex: fear of speaking)
- Phobia is a fear that interferes with people’s ability to live their lives day to day -> some aspect of the phobia must interfere with normal functioning
- There are 5 sub-types of phobia disorders
- Each of these is diagnosed as a specific sub-type of phobia
- Marked persistent and excessive or unreasonable fear when in the presence or when anticipating to be in the presence of the object -> the person has to realize themselves that the fear is excessive
- In all cases, fear is not of the object itself
- Instead, fear is of some dire outcome of interacting with the object (ex: fear of being bitten by a snake or being stuck in an elevator)
What are the 5 sub-types of phobia disorders?
- Animal-Type (rodents, reptiles, insects)
- Natural Environment-Type (storms, heights)
- Blood/injection/injury type
- Situational Type (tunnels, bridges, elevators, flying)
- Residual “other” category (very common - choking, vomiting, illness, loud noises, falling down)
Why is the nature of the fear in phobia key to diagnosis?
- Fear of airplanes can be diagnosed as 2 different phobias, depending on the reasoning behind the fear
- Ex: Anna is afraid of airplanes because she fears falling from the sky and dying -> airplane phobia
- Ex: Sam is afraid of airplanes because he fears he will be trapped and unable to escape if he suddenly starts to feel dizzy or nauseated -> agoraphobia because he fears places where he feels he won’t be able to escape if he needs to
What’s the Epidemiology, Onset and Course of phobia disorders?
- Phobias are relatively common
- Specific phobia prevalence: 12.5%
- Agoraphobia prevalence: 1.5%
- 2F:1M
- Comorbidity very high (very often comorbid with other anxieties and depression)
- Most children outgrow specific fears
- Most don’t become phobic adults
- Not true of other anxiety disorders (onset in childhood will often persist in adulthood)
- All specific phobias tend to have onsets in childhood
- Agoraphobia often onsets in adulthood