Midterm 1 Flashcards
Why do we define mental illness/why do we diagnose?
- Knowing what the issue is makes it easier to treat it
- Helps with self-stigmatization (explains behaviour to the individual and provides clarity)
- Can standardize treatments so everyone with that illness gets the same treatment
- Can help others understand how to interact with an individual who is mentally ill
What are arguments against defining mental illness or diagnosing?
- Some think it stigmatizes people
- Some believe it removes the individuality of mentally ill people and “puts them in a box”
- It can be difficult to arbitrate what is and what isn’t mental illness
What’s the DSM?
- Diagnostic and Statistical Manual
- Manual in North America that we use to define and classify mental disorders
What are the purposes of a classification system?
- Description: highlight critical features of a diagnosis -> ex: what are the important symptoms of schizophrenia?
- Prediction: may tell you something about course, treatment response, etiology
- Theory: Provides a set of postulates about relationships of different elements to one another (important for research into psychopathology)
- Communication: for example between clinicians (you want every clinician to have the same definition of different disorders)
What are the limitations of a classification system?
- Loss of Uniqueness: diagnosis implies that common features are more important than the ways in which individuals vary
- Difficulty of boundary cases: what do you do about the people who are on the boundary? Do we arbitrarily decide which group they’re more similar to?
- Ex: similar to procrustean beds -> we fit people into the diagnosis rather than fit the diagnosis to the people in front of us
What are categorical systems?
- Identifies the presence/absence of a disorder -> you either have the disorder or you don’t (you’re anxious or you’re not)
- Advantageous for research and understanding
- Simplifies communication (provides a lot of info relatively quickly)
- Natural preference among people to employ categories in speech (heuristics)
- Categories better-suited for clinical decision-making (Hospitalize or don’t? Treat or don’t?)
- Cutoffs in categorical system tend to magnify small differences
What are dimensional systems?
- Rank on a continuous quantitative dimension
- Degree to which a symptom is present
- Ex: how anxious are you on a scale of 1 to 10?
- May better capture an individual’s functioning
- Everybody falls somewhere
- Arbitrary cut-offs
- Proposes thresholds for diagnoses
-Preserves more info
Describe the invention of the DSM
- DSM I was first introduced in 1952
- The 1st and 2nd DSM were very similar
- First attempts to standardize definitions of psychopathology
- People were trying to establish a scientifically grounded shared set of definitions for psychopathology
- With standardized definitions you can determine how common or rare something (ex: a behaviour) is
Describe the DSM-II
- 1968
- Very similar to DSM-I
- Few categories
- No requirements for # of symptoms
- Psychoanalysis was the dominant paradigm
Describe the DSM-III
- 1980
- Demand for a more biological, empirical approach
- Inclusion Criteria: What symptoms do you need to have, and how many?
- Duration Criteria: How long do you need to exhibit these symptoms?
- Exclusion Criteria: What symptoms rule out a diagnosis?
- Multi-Axial Classification
How are disorders in the DSM determined?
Often these diagnoses are determined by a small group of experts determining a consensus on definitions of disorders and their validity
What’s the Multi-Axial Classification?
- Axis I (first axis you use). Major Clinical Disorders (ex: MDD, PTSD)
- Axis II. Personality Disorders (ex: BPD, NPD)
- Axis III. Medical conditions that might contribute or be relevant to treatment
- Axis IV. Psychosocial Stressors (something with which to record environmental contexts) -> may interfere with treatment
- Axis V. Global Assessment Functioning (GAF) –> a simple rating of function/summary score for severity
- The primary problem would always be if someone has an Axis 1 problem and Axis 2 was used after to determine if using the right treatment
Describe the differences in the number of diagnostic categories per edition of DSM
- Large difference between DSM-I and DSM-II (~75 more)
- Large difference between DSM-II and DSM-III (~80 more)
- Smaller difference between DSM-III and DSM-III-R (~30 more)
- Even smaller difference between DSM-III-R and DSM-IV-TR (5 more)
- Less categories in DSM-5 than in DSM-IV-TR (140 less)
What are the assumptions that were introduced in DSM-III?
- Symptoms are the most useful basis for assessment
- Nosology based primarily on behavior and symptoms and not on etiology
- Beforehand it was focused on etiology
- Locus of pathology is in the individual (not the system that the individual is a part of)
Describe the DSM-IV
- 1994
- Didn’t make a lot of changes
- Introduced “clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning”
Describe the DSM-IV-TR
- 2000
- DMS-4-TEXT REVISION
- The revision process of this one was much more public and research-based
- Did not introduce new diagnoses or specific criteria
- Provided more info on each diagnosis
- Provided a broad definition of mental illness
Describe the DSM-5
- 2013
- Removed multi-axial system
- Introduced dimensional assessment criteria for some diagnoses (spectrum of varying degrees of a disorder)
- Re-classified some disorders (ex: OCD and PTSD no longer classified as anxiety disorders)
- Removed others
What are some challenges to the categorical classification system?
- Heterogeneity
- Comorbidity
Describe the heterogeneity challenge to the categorical classification system
- Ex: if depression is in one category and anxiety is in a different one then we would assume that people within each category look like one another and different from the people in the other categories
- However we find heterogeneity in some of these categories
- Different people with the same diagnosis will look differently
Describe the comorbidity challenge to the categorical classification system
- Comorbidity: simultaneous presentation of more than one disease
- Ex: MDD and Anxiety are often comorbid
- If someone presents with more than one diagnosis, do you treat both simultaneously or on a case by case basis
Describe comorbidity
- For people who currently meet criteria for one disorder, 50% qualify for more than one and over the course of their lifetime 75%
- Comorbidity is the norm (suggests the categories are probably not working that well)
- Comorbidity affects course, development, presentation, treatment response, severity of the symptoms, etc.
- Comorbid patients tend to have poorer outcomes (ex: short lives and poor quality of life)
- Not accounting for comorbidity can lead to a lack of info in understanding a patient’s condition
- Most people with MDD also have a comorbidity
- Research Implications: anything you find to be associated with one disorder may actually be a result of the comorbid disorder
What are some reasons for why comorbidity exists?
- Chance
- Sampling bias
- Problems with diagnostic criteria
- Poorly-drawn diagnostic boundaries
- Causal explanation
- Shared etiological risk factors
Explain why chance is a reason for why comorbidity exists
- Some comorbidity is just chance
- Ex: odds of MDD for adult females = 20%
- Ex: odds of anxiety disorder for adult females = 20%
- By chance alone, 4% will have both
Explain why sampling bias is a reason for why comorbidity exists
- Each disorder associated with a chance of being treated
- Individuals with more disorders (more severe individuals) are more likely to seek treatment
- Clinical samples = likely biased samples
- But, we find high rates of comorbidity in community samples as well -> not just clinical samples
- Sampling bias doesn’t account for all
Explain why problems with diagnostic criteria is a reason for why comorbidity exists
- Many criterion sets overlap (same symptoms appear in different disorder sets)
- Ex: Suicidal ideation in MDD, Schiz, BPD, AUD, SUD
- Ex: Sleeplessness in MDD and GAD & Worry in GAD and MDD
- Can’t totally account for high rates of comorbidity
Explain why poorly-drawn diagnostic boundaries is a reason for why comorbidity exists
- Multiformity (disorders can express themselves in multiple ways)
- People with MDD frequently have panic attacks -> if only looking at panic attacks, you may assume someone with MDD has panic disorder
- Comorbid disorders may reflect a 3rd, independent
disorder
Explain why a causal explanation is a reason for why comorbidity exists
- One disorder is a risk factor for another disorder
- Ex: Conduct Disorder may lead to adult Substance Use Disorder
Explain why shared etiological risk factors is a reason for why comorbidity exists
- Etiology: origins of disorder
- Childhood maltreatment is a risk factor for almost every disorder
- Biological commonalities can also be risk factors -> not much research on this
Describe the Dimensional/Hierarchical Models of pathology
- Tom Achenbach conducted a factory analysis to see which symptoms or diagnoses clump together (share a variance) and which don’t, to try to identify factors
- In this system you have 2 factors -> internalizing and externalizing
- These are distinct and relatively independent but correlate within themselves
- He believed that this explains comorbidity (what are the factors that explain the similarities within diagnostic categories)
- Internalizing: people that cause distress to themselves
- Externalizing: people that cause distress to others
Describe the internalizing factor of the dimensional/hierarchical models
- Split in 2 sub-categories: Anxious misery and fear
- Anxious misery is comprised of MDD and GAD
- Fear is comprised of Panic and Social Phobia
Describe the externalizing factor of the dimensional/hierarchical models
- Split in 2 sub-categories: addiction and aggression
- Addiction is comprised of Alcohol Abuse and Drug Dependence
- Aggression is comprised of ODD and CD
What are some problems with the dimensional/hierarchical models of pathology?
○ There are more disorders that don’t fit in these models
- Internalizing and Externalizing forms of dysfunction often correlate with themselves
Describe the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP)
- The most recent way of thinking about these hierarchical ways of describing psychopathology
- Introduced a thought disorder category
- Included some personality disorders
- Method used for this is factory analysis
- This isn’t a causal model, it’s just describing the structure of psychopathology
Describe RDoC (Research Domain Criteria)
- Funding initiative
- Wanted to forget diagnoses altogether and focus on dysfunctions of core systems since many disorders can fit into these
- Trans-diagnostic approach
- This isn’t used for treatment this is just used for research on descriptions
What’s prevalence?
- % of people in a population with a disorder at a
particular point in time - Ex: past month, year, or lifetime
- Prevalence = incidence x chronicity
What’s incidence?
- % of people who develop a disorder for the 1st time during a specific time period
- 1st onset cases
What’s a risk factor?
- For epidemiologists, a correlate (most often demographic variables) associated with different disorders
- Psychologists use this term to mean predictor, or cause (should not be a causality)
Describe the relativity of the 1-year prevalence rates of the different psychological disorders (highest to lowest)
- SAD (6.8% -> highest prevalence rate)
- MDD (6.7% -> close 2nd highest)
- PTSD (3.5% -> 3rd highest (Half less than SAD & MDD)
- GAD (3.1% -> close 4th)
- Panic (2.7% -> close 5th)
- Bipolar (2.6% -> close 6th)
- Persistent Depressive Disorder (1.5%)
- OCD (1% -> lowest prevalence rate)
Describe the relativity of the onset of the different psychological disorders (youngest to oldest)
- PTSD (any age)
- OCD (child/adolescent)
- SAD (13)
- Major Depression (14-15 or 30s)
- Panic (24)
- Bipolar (25)
- Persistent Depressive Disorder (30s)
- GAD (31)
Describe the relativity of the lifetime prevalence rates between mood disorders, anxiety disorders, substance use disorders and any disorder (highest to lowest)
- Any disorder (46%, almost 1/2 -> highest) -> 46% will meet criteria of a DMS diagnosis within their lifetime
- Anxiety disorders (27% -> 2nd highest)
- Mood disorder (21%, about 1/5)
- Substance use disorders (15% -> lowest)
Describe the relativity of the 1-year prevalence rates for 19-25 yr old college (CS) & non-college students (NCS) for mental health usage, mood disorders, anxiety disorders, substance use disorders and any disorder
- Any disorder: CS = 45.8% and NCS = 47.7% (higher for NCS)
- Anxiety disorder: CS = 11.9% and NCS = 12.7% (higher for NCS)
- Mood disorder: CS = 10.6% and NCS = 11.9% (higher for NCS)
- Alcohol Use Disorder: CS = 20.4% and NCS = 17% (higher for CS)
- Mental Health Usage: CS = 18.5% and NCS = 21.5% (higher for NCS)
What’s etiology?
- The scientific study of the causes of things
- Etiology of mental disorders -> why do people become mentally ill, what are the causes?
What are etiological perspectives on psychopathology?
- Environmental causes
- Genetics causes
- Diathesis-Stress Model
- Vulnerability-stress correlations
- Developmental pathways (equifinality and multi finality)
What are some environmental causes of psychopathology?
*Environmental/ learning experiences
*Freudian theories:
- “schizophrenogenic mother” -> popular in the 40s-70s , the idea that a mother that often switches between being overbearing and neglectful can cause schizophrenia
- “refrigerator mother” -> idea that a mother that lacked genuine warmth and positivity caused autism
What are some genetic causes of psychopathology?
- Genes are not deterministic -> most are probabilistic (if your family is tall, you’re more likely to be tall)
- Make small contributions (with other genes) to create the ultimate outcome
- Single gene association doesn’t exist (ex: “this is the gene for schizophrenia”
- Researchers identifying dozens of genes that, in certain combinations, lead to symptoms of different forms of psychopathology
- Polygenic - influenced by activity of many genes -> How many genes you have determines where you fall on dimension/spectrum
- There’s strong evidence of psychopathology running in the family -> MDD in the family could make someone more likely to get MDD
- No mental illness to this day is perfectly heritable
Describe the Diathesis-Stress model
- Diathesis model tries to drop the nature vs nurture debate, it’s trying to bring these ideas together (gene-environment correlation)
- The diathesis is a vulnerability or predisposition to develop psychopathology
- Stress is exposure to experiences or things that overwhelm an organism
- Only when both stress and diathesis is present that one becomes mentally ill (not when stress absent/diathesis present, stress absent/diathesis absent or stress present/diathesis absent)
Describe the reworking of the Diathesis-Stress model
- Etiological heterogeneity
- Assumes diathesis and stress are independent
- Say that it’s not do you have the diathesis or stress or do you not, now it’s to what degree do you have either or?
- Now, no diathesis is not perfectly protective -> people without a diathesis that are exposed to high levels of stress could develop a disorder
What are some challenges to the reworking of the Diathesis-Stress model
- There’s not just a single etiological pathway
- We have a lot of evidence for gene environment correlations showing these are not independent of one another
Describe vulnerability-stress correlations
- Often non-independent in important ways
- Stress Generation -> ex: excessive reassurance seeking
- “Scars” as vulnerability -> ex: cognitive vulnerabilities following MDD episode
- Vulnerability may shape perception of the stress
- Stress can influence the development of the diathesis -> ex: gestational stress (can change brain development that can make people more vulnerable to developing psychopathology) and mental illness
- It’s not just exposure to stress that leads to depression, people that have depression behave in ways that leads to more stress
- Parents that have a genetic risk for externalizing behaviours pass that onto their children but they may also through their parenting create externalizing behaviours in a child
- Dynamic relationship with lots of correlation
What’s equifinality?
- Final common pathway
- People who get a disorder, get it from different causes
- Getting to the same point from many different pathways
- Equifinality explains how multiple different pathways converge on the same point
- Most disorders that we encounter are representative of equifinality
What’s multifinality?
- Final different pathways
- A single risk factor can lead to many outcomes
- Ex: experiences of child abuse are associated with almost all forms of psychopathology
What are the different types of longitudinal designs?
- Retrospective
- Follow-up
- High Risk
Describe the retrospective longitudinal design
- A study that looks back into history
- Collect a sample of people with a disorder
- Try to determine what factors preceded the onset of the disorder
- Data collected through self-reports and existing archival data (looking at home videos or school reports to identify abnormalities -> ex: when looking at home videos of schizophrenic individuals, people could identify motor abnormalities that could predict schizophrenia)
Describe the main limitation with retrospective longitudinal designs
- Problem with relying on recall
- Memory is not always accurate
- Mood states can affect the way people recall things (depressive episodes can lead to people reporting things more negatively)
Describe the follow-up studies longitudinal design
- Follow people with the disorder over time
- See what happens to them (trying to observe the course of the disorder overtime)
- Already-ill sample
- Difficult to derive etiological explanations
Describe the high risk studies longitudinal design
- Variant of follow-up
- Identify people who are likely to develop a disorder
- Ex: offspring of people with a disorder (genetic), biological abnormality, behavioural variable
- Follow them over time (prospective longitudinal study)
- This is difficult because you need a very large sample to be able to make statistical inferences
- More statistical power when using people who are more likely to develop a disorder for sample
- These are powerful designs but there are a lot of challenges
Describe the limitations of high risk studies
- Genetic: Need to find people who have the disorder and also have children (people with schizophrenia often don’t have offspring)
- Biological: associations not well-proven
- Behaviors: may be a risk factor, or may be early manifestation of the disease
- If you recruit the offspring of someone with a disorder, you may not have a representative sample
- It’s hard to get someone to come to the lab, let alone a person and their child
- These studies are uncommon because they’re hard to do and are expensive
What are the characteristics of a vulnerability marker?
- Should be trait-like, not state-related
- If a marker only appears when people are ill, then it isn’t a vulnerability marker (it should be present before the illness, during and after)
- Ex: negative attribution bias as vulnerability marker, you would want to see this before the disorder, during episodes of depression, and after
- Has to be correlated with the disorder, but has to persist beyond the end of the episode -> if a marker isn’t evident prior but persists after the offset of a disorder, this could be considered a scar -> not considered a vulnerability marker
- Has to be present in a high-risk population (not a vulnerability marker if it’s not present in people who are at higher risk for developing it)
- Has to pre-date disorder
What’s case control?
- Compare one group of people with disorder to a second group without the disorder
- Case control tends to be most informative and useful if you’re looking at a disorder that’s rare because you have to recruit a lot of people
What’s a cohort?
- A single large sample of people, some of whom have the disorder
- Cohort is preferable when the disorder is not that rare because you can compare your control group to multiple groups of people with different disorders
Describe the patients vs community issue with psychopathology
- Patient populations not representative of people with the disorder in the community -> a lot of people don’t seek treatment so patient populations aren’t very representative
- Clinical populations tend to be more severe, have more comorbidities, more likely to be female (women are more likely to seek treatment than men), higher SES, chronic -> represent people seeking treatment
- General population, get a sense of disorder “in the wild” -> general population tend to be milder and lead to misdiagnosis
- Very expensive (because large samples)
- We need info from both designs
What are controls?
- Healthy Controls (HC): often “super healthy controls” because this group is a smaller % of the population because most people at some point in their life will meet criteria for a psychiatric dysfunction
- Psychiatric Controls (PC): people from a psychiatric population with a different disorder
What’s genetic epidemiology?
Trying to understand to what extent there are genetic contributions to pathology
What are family studies?
- Does the disorder run in families? If not, then no genetic contribution
- Why does it run in families?
- First identify proband (someone that has the disorder)
- Assess family members to see who in the family also has a disorder
- Interview -> Family Study
- Informant report -> Family History Study
- Many disorders run in families -> rates of illness in family members of the proband must be higher than in general population (or of family members of the controls) to state that the depression runs in the family
- Subthreshold/symptoms -> family members may show symptoms but not have the disorder (ex: we don’t inherit the disorders but we inherit the traits that make us vulnerable to these like magical thinking or paranoia
- Coaggregation: if looking at depression in a proband, their family will not only have higher rates of depression but also of anxiety disorders than in the general population (depression and anxiety tend to coaggregate together)
- Suggest genetic role, does not prove it (because family members are similar to one another due to shared experiences, environments and culture)
What are adoption studies?
- Natural experiment (observation of people already in these situations) attempting to isolate the effect of genes on psychopathology
- Parent as proband
- Adoptee as proband
- Cross-fostering design
- Typically we want to look at parental psychopathology in these studies
Describe the cross-fostering design in adoption studies
Children of parents without schizophrenia adopted into a household of parents with schizophrenia and children of parents with schizophrenia adopted into a household of parents without schizophrenia -> which of these groups is at a higher risk of developing schizophrenia
Describe the parent as proband design in adoption studies
- Group of parents, some of whom have the disorder and others who don’t all of which have given their children up for adoption
- The people who gave you your genes are not the ones that raised you -> removes the environmental and experience similarities
Describe the adoptee as proband design in adoption studies
Track down and assist the biological and the adoptive parents (ex: child has depression, are the biological or/and adoptive parents more at risk to develop depression?)
Describe the limitations to adoption studies
- Adoption is a rare event
- Adoptive parents are very carefully screened -> typically not allowed to adopt a child if you have a history of psychopathology
- Creates an unrepresentative sample for these studies
What’s fear?
- Response to a current present threat -> real or perceived
- Something that is either present or is perceived to be in the presence of the person
- Fear response: response to keep us safe from threats (to enable fight or flight)
- Fear is fast (rapid fear response)
- This response is not necessarily mediated by conscious thought -> immediate physiological and behavioural response
- The fear is to the present object
- Usually calms down pretty quickly once the stimuli is removed
- Physiological responses -> all thought to emerge to aid the organism in surviving when encountering a threat
- Fear response exists/evolved to keep us safe (it’s our friend)
- Preparation for adaptive action
- The neural systems that allow us to see danger are very primitive and fast -> when using these systems, you’re not differentiating between dangerous animals and non-dangerous animals (ex: you don’t have time to differentiate between a tarantula and a non-dangerous spider)
What are the physiological responses related to fear?
- Increased heart rate
- Blood pressure increases
- Increases in hormones like cortisol and adrenaline
- Muscle tension
- Increased breathing rate
- Etc.