Midterm 1 Flashcards
Why a pain course in psychology?
- Pain is a perception (it’s a sensation, a conscious experience)
- Pain is an emotion (emotions are studied by psychologists)
- Pain is a strong (perhaps strongest) motivator of behaviour -> some have argued that pain is the strongest motivator of behaviour (the thing that cannot be ignored - this depends on how much pain you’re in)
- Very high levels of pain are probably among the strongest motivators but there are reports of people withstanding a lot of torture in favour of their ideals suggesting that pain doesn’t always trump everything else
- Pain importantly affects psychological health and well-being (it’s very hard to have wellbeing if you’re in pain, especially if that pain is above a certain level)
- Pain is more “psychological” than other sensations (ex: vision, audition, touch) or disease states (pain is arguably more psychological than Parkinson’s and cancer to the extent that it’s modified by psychological factors to a greater degree) -> the correlation between the intensity of the stimulus and the intensity of the perception is weak
List the examples of the psychological modulation of pain presented in class
- People voluntarily inflicting pain upon themselves
- The 2 “nail tails”
- The inguinal hernia
- Frequency of pain and narcotic use for war wounds vs civilian surgical wounds
What are some reasons for why people (commonly men) voluntarily inflict pain upon themselves?
- Religious imperative might enable you to tolerate causing pain to yourself: religious reasons are usually the reason for self-flagellation
- Masochism
- Proof of strength to cultural leaders
- There are certain treatment modalities that involve pain to treat pain (ex: acupuncture)
- To make a political point (ex: setting yourself aflame)
- As an act (ex: a carnival act) -> some people are insensitive to pain, for genetic reasons they don’t feel any pain at all (CIP - Congenital Insensitivity to Pain)
- Aesthetic purposes (ex: tattoos and piercings)
- As a test of your personal fortitude
Describe the 2 “nail tails”
1) Pain with no injury
- Construction worker that jumped down on a 15 cm nail
- He was convinced that it went right through his foot
- He was in pain and demanded fentanyl (an opioid)
- The smallest movement caused pain so they sedated him with fentanyl and midazolam
- It was found later that the nail went right through his toes and there was no injury at all to his foot
2) Serious injury without pain
- Worker using a nail gun and nail accidentally went right up through his chin
- He couldn’t see the nail
- Later complained of a mild toothache
- Went to the dentist 6 days later
- Saw in X-ray that he had a 4-inch nail right through his skull
Who discovered the placebo effect?
Henry Beecher
According to Finlay et al. (2018) what are the top 10 presenting complaints at family doctor visits?
- Cough
- Back pain
- Abdominal pain
- Sore throat
- Dermatitis (itch)
- Fever
- Headache
- Leg pain
- Respiratory
- Fatigue
According to Stutts et al. (2009) what are the most common/prevalent pain events among University of Florida undergraduates?
- Scratched skin (95%)
- Paper cut (95%)
- Pinched skin (94.6%)
- Headaches (94%)
- Mosquito bite (94%)
- Falling off bicycle (92.5%)
- Muscle soreness (90.9%)
- Bruise (90.9%)
- Dust in eye (90.9%)
- Cut from shaving (89%)
According to Stutts et al. (2009) what are the least common/prevalent pain events among University of Florida undergraduates?
- Heart attack (0%)
- Advanced cancer (1%)
- Childbirth (1%)
- Skin ulcer (2%)
- Stabbed with a knife (2%)
- Amputation of body part (2%)
- Kidney stone (3%)
- Gun shot (3%)
- Sexual abuse/assault (3%)
- Spinal tap (4.8%)
What’s epidemiology?
The study and analysis of the distribution, patterns and
determinants of health and disease conditions in a defined population
Describe the personal inguinal hernia story
- Was experiencing pain in a certain spot and his wife told him it was probably an inguinal hernia
- Inguinal hernia: when a little piece of your intestine pops out of the muscle wall and hangs out on the outside
- Only treatment is a surgery
- Wife and him started stressing out because it takes long to recover from it and they had to care for their children
- Was in so much pain (his pain was an 8 or 9 out of 10)
- Went to the doctor and doctor told him it was a muscle spasm
- After doctor’s appointment no more pain
- The pain wasn’t from the injury but what was causing the pain and intensifying it was what he thought the pain meant (the meaning of the pain and nothing about the injury itself)
Describe Beecher’s (1956) study on the frequency of pain and narcotic use for war wounds vs civilian surgical wounds
- Famous study by Henry Beecher
- Comparison of the frequency of pain severe enough to require a narcotic in 2 situations: war wounds and civilian surgical wounds
- He compared pain levels and whether people asked or didn’t ask for narcotics (opioids)
- Included trauma to bones, intra-thoracic trauma, intra-abdominal trauma
- Asked them how much pain they’re in from a scale of none, slight, moderate, severe and if they wanted narcotics
- Beecher equalized the extent of the injuries so in both cases, the injuries were equally severe
- Found that people with war wounds refused the narcotics 68% of the time whereas people with post-operative pain wanted narcotics 83% of the time
- Beecher concluded the difference in psychological context explained the difference in these 2 situations
- The soldiers had just survived their war wound and were probably now going back home because they had a wound serious enough to get them out of service but they were alive (probably good news for a soldier) and the people having surgeries were simply people having surgeries
- He concluded that the psychological modulation was responsible for the difference in the situations
Describe the problem of pain
- Pain is the most important human problem and certainly most important human health problem
- Pain is the #1 reason to seek health care (besides just annual visits)
- Consists of 1/2 of top 10 presenting complaints at family doctor visits (you add these all together and pain is the #1 reason by far that people go to the doctor)
- Pain is the #1 concern of patients with chronic diseases (ex: cancer, arthritis, diabetes) -> if you give surveys to those with chronic diseases and ask them what their #1 concern is, surveys find that the #1 concern is whether their pain will be controlled
- Despite what your doctor learned in medical school, pain can kill
- Generations have been taught that pain isn’t that important because it doesn’t kill you
- MDs are taught that pain is a symptom of disease and if you cure the disease, the pain will go away and to not worry about the pain because that’s a secondary issue and besides pain can’t kill you
- However, pain can kill you but it doesn’t do it directly -> it does so indirectly by increasing the chances for cancer, heart disease, or other things that kill you
- Society cares more about mortality than morbidity (care less about sickness than death)
- They should care about morbidity because sickness lasts a lot longer than mortality and is as big a concern or bigger than mortality but people sort of dismiss it as a topic that isn’t worth researching or spending money on
- “Pain is a more terrible lord of mankind than even death itself.” -Albert Schweitzer (1931)
What are other possible explanations/confounds that weren’t controlled for in Beecher’s (1956) study on the frequency of pain and narcotic use for war wounds vs civilian surgical wounds
- Difference in age groups (soldiers were younger (~25) and patients were older (middle age - ~45))
- Maybe there’s something about the type of person that wants to/agrees to become a soldier (probably not the case here because most of these soldiers were drafted)
- Difference in the time since the trauma -> in the hospital, they were able to wake up the patients and ask them about their pain levels within ~4hrs after surgery ended (basically soon after they come out of anesthetic) whereas soldiers had to be evacuated from the battle front to the IVAC hospital which was longer (maybe the pain was as bad at the 4-hour time-point but with time it got better)
- Maybe it’s less socially acceptable for soldiers to admit to pain and ask for pain reducing medication (psychological modulation of the reporting of pain)
Why do we say that pain is a universal experience?
- There are types of pain that essentially everyone has had
- There’s no one in the world who doesn’t know what pain is and what pain feels like and what it means
Describe the discordance between Osteoarthritis (OA) disease and pain as shown in Bedson & Croft (2008) studies
- Osteoarthritis (OA): disease of the joints where a disease process causes the joints to narrow and the cartilage between the joints thins out so it’s not forming the cushioning function that it’s supposed to
- Eventually it gets bad enough that the bones touch each other and grind against each other
- It’s often very painful, but it isn’t always painful
- Results from 2 meta-analyses
- Left meta-analysis:
- Meta-analysis of 17 studies that all had in common that they enrolled as participants people that had knee OA that was confirmed by a radiologist (there were X-rays)
- Every participant in this study had diagnosed knee OA
- They simply asked participants “do you have knee pain”
- Some of them had knee pain and some of them didn’t
- Most patients didn’t report having knee pain
- Right meta-analysis:
- Meta-analysis of 12 studies
- Everyone had knee pain
- Some had knee OA but most of them didn’t
- This isn’t only true for OA, there’s equally good data for back pain
- If you go out on the street and you select 100 random people, all of which are not complaining of back pain, you’ll find disk herniations in 40% of them
- You can do the reverse experiment too
- Pain and the diseases/conditions that cause pain can be dissociated from each other (clear feature of pain)
- Shows that if you have knee OA pain, your pain isn’t only due to the knee OA as it takes more than knee OA to cause pain
- This indicates that there’s nothing about OA that makes pain mandatory and vice versa
- There is no correlation (correlation = 0) between how much pain you have and how bad your OA is
Why do we say pain isn’t the problem?
- Pain isn’t the problem (you need and want this)
- Chronic pain is the clinical problem
Describe the prevalence of chronic pain
- Elliott et al. (1999)
- Lifetime prevalence of chronic pain (the chances that you will have 1 or more episodes of chronic pain in your lifetime) = 1 in 2 (a little less than 50%)
- Point prevalence (the chances that you have chronic pain right now) = 1 in 4 (between 20 and 25%)
- This is a lot of people
- The only thing that comes close to this high prevalence is depression/anxiety if you put them together
- Everything else is much rarer than that
Describe the epidemiologist’s bathtub
- A way of analogizing all the different epidemiological terms that are in common use
- Analogy of water in a bathtub
- Prevalence is the amount of water in the tub (point prevalence)
- 3 things that can affect the amount of water in the tub:
1. Death (mortality): people with the disease can die and then there would be less water in the tub so this is depicted as water coming out of the drain, which would lower the amount of water in the tub
2. Incidence: new cases of a disease/condition - How many new diagnosed cases of something there are in a particular period of time (usually a year)
- This can change overtime (some diseases are increasing in incidence and some are decreasing)
- Represented by the tap adding water in the tub
3. Recovery: things get better by themselves a lot - Chronic pain is no exception
- People don’t have chronic pain for the rest of their lives (only a few unlucky individuals do, such as those who develop back pain at an early age and have it till they die (this is very rare) but most have chronic pain for a few months and then it gets better on its own)
Describe the prevalence of back pain as depicted by the NHS in one year
- Prevalence of back pain in the UK
- National Health Service = Medicare equivalent in the UK
- Prevalence estimate in the population: 16.5 million people
- The UK has 80 million people
- Back pain is ~15% of population
- A lot of people have back pain and don’t do anything about it
- Prevalence of those consulting their general practitioner (GP - family medicine practitioner in the UK): between 3-7 million people
- Asked GPs how many people are you currently treating or are currently/have complained in the last year of back pain
- Out-patients prevalence (gone to the hospital for back pain but not admitted): 1.6 million
- In-patients prevalence (patients that were admitted in the hospital for the treatment of back pain - presumably for a surgery): 100 000
- Surgery prevalence (back surgery): 24 000
Why are the different types of prevalence important to pay attention to?
- Depending on your purposes, these numbers will vary in their importance to you
- These prevalence numbers are often used for political purposes
- Ex: trying to build more sympathy in donations or calling for more research or funding
- Be careful of what numbers people display for prevalence
Describe the issues with Lipton & Bigal’s (2007) depiction of the prevalence of pain as seen in headaches in children
- Table showing ~10 epidemiological studies of migraines in children
- Overall prevalence estimates range over a big range (ex: 1 study said it was 3% of children who have migraines and another study said it was almost 11%)
- All these numbers are very high for headaches in children
- The estimates are so different because all of these epidemiological studies have made different choices:
- They made different choices of what the population was that they were estimating the prevalence in
- Very different sample sizes (ranging from 1400 to over 10 000)
- The age range of the children was completely different in the different studies (assuming that the prevalence of migraines changes with age, if you cut off your age range in different places, you’ll get very different results)
- Different time frame of prevalence
- 2 or more different definitions of migraines were used (IHS definition vs academic definition)
- Issue with some definitions being more stringent than others and with the use of less stringent definition of a disease, more people are going to have the disease
What’s a common issue in epidemiology?
You can come up with very different numbers based on how you ask questions
Describe the prevalence of pain compared to other diseases as depicted by a figure representing the self-reported prevalence of specific chronic conditions by sex, household population aged 15yrs and older in Canada (2007-2008)
- Back pain
- High blood pressure
- Arthritis
- Migraine
- Mood or anxiety disorder
- Astma
- Diabetes
- Heart disease
- Bowel disorder/ Crohn’s disease or colitis
- Urinary incontinence
- Ulcers
- Cancer
- Stroke
- Alzheimer’s disease or dementia
- Most to least
- Pain is # 1, 3, 4 and 9
- This accounts for 3 out of the top 4
Describe the prevalence of pain by body part as depicted by the U.S. National Health Interview Survey (2007)
- Back (unspecified): 24%
- Lower back: 18%
- Knee: 16% (more prevalent due to arthritis)
- Head: 15% (more prevalent due to headaches)
- Leg: 14%
- Joints (unspecified): 10%
- Shoulder: 9%
- Neck: 8%
- Hip: 8%
- Hand: 6%
- Upper back: 5%
- There’s pain in all parts of the body but some parts of the body have more pain than others
- There’s a lot more pain in you lower back than your upper back (much more likely to have lower back pain than upper back pain)