Microsurgery Management of Apical Periodontitis Flashcards
microsurgery success
93%
traditional surgery success
implication?
59%
the microsurgery provides higher success rates
endodontic success into three categories
clinical
radiographic
histo- no inflammation
rationale for tx
- treat persistent infection/ inflammation
- when non-surgical treatment or re-treatment can not be performed
- surgery should only be performed by skilled specialist equipped
Failure of NSRCT
cannot always be completed
- maybe missed anatomy
- true extra-radicualr infections and presence of BIOFILM
describe biofilm
sessile cells attached to solid substrates as well as each other and are embedded in EPS (85% of biofilm)
most common cause of failed endo SURGERY
apical leakage
T/F microscope required?
YES
why difficult
- small operating field
- anatomic structures i.e. neuro-vascular bundle
- lack of understanding of apical root canal anatomy
microscope training mandatory?
YES
incision and drainage
START ROOT CANAL TX FIRST - because dont want to have I&D
to treat teeth with acute apical abscess of pulpal origin
- primary drainage thru the tooth must be attempted first
- fluctuation swelling is incised and blunt dissection is followed to establish drainage
- pressure is relieved
- provides good pain control
- environment is changed to an AEROBIC environment
drain is placed how many hours?
48-72 hours to prevent closure of the incision site
drain is placed how many hours?
48-72 hours to prevent closure of the incision site
Indications for PEriradicualr surgery
present in?
- elimination of extra-radicualr infection
present in cysts and abscesses only NOT IN GRANULOMAS
- actinomyces and propionibacterium
- elimination of the un-debrided canal space
- NSRCT or RCRT are not feasible
- explaratory surgery
- BIOPSY - WHEN DONT KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON
potential contra-indications of peri-radicualr
- proximity of neurovascualr bundle
2.
contra-indications of peri-radicualr
- poor perio health
2. surgeons skill
anatomic problems an indication for surgery?
YES
procedural mis-adventures reason for surgery?
yes
separated insturmnets decrease prognosis by?
14%
why is there a larger decrease in prognosis from healthy PDL vs teeth with CAP (chroninc apical)
because already better if healthier?
incidence of fractured instruments?
3%
incidence of fractured instruments?
3%
isthmus definition
a narrow connection between two root canals , usually containing pulp types
complete isthmus
a definite / full conection between the two main canals
incomplete – stop/ go not all the way through
MB root of max first molar - isthmus?
100% of the time
biopsy reason for surgery?
YES
biopsy reason for surgery?
YES
grafting and GTR indicated?
size? implication on prognosis?
in through and through defects or perio-endo lesions
size of the bony crpty is NOT indicative of prognosis but prognosis is DEPTH of the bony access
two requirements for resoprtive defects
- inflammation
2. loss of the protective pre-cemental / dentin layer
etiology of resorptive defects
- ortho
- trauma
- bleaching
- idiopathic
some sort of trauma
treatment for resorptive defects
90% TCA (tri-chloro-cetic acid) application , curettage, restoration with Geristore (resin-modified glass ionomer) – only one that allows long-junctional epithelial attachement -so soft tissue can grow back on it
repair of resorptive defects is indication for surgery?
Yes
perforations an indication for surgery?
yes
perforations prognosis? *** best when
sooner better
smaller the better
more apical in bone the better the prognosis
perfs in contact with have worst prognosis?
oral fluid
strip perforation due to
over-preparation of the tooth
exploratory surgery? relevant?
YES – but less now with CBCT’s
situations where peri-radicualr surgery may NOT be advisible
- medically compromised
- indiscriminant use of surgery
- unidentified / indiscriminant use of surgery
- skill not there
anatomic factors where surgery may not be good
maxillary sinus connection
13% of max post ter
which tooth is closest to sinus **
MB root of max 2nd molar closest to the sinus and the buccal root of max 1st premolar is the farthest
mental and IAN with surgery not advisible
mental foramen is
most crucial aspect to good surgery outcome
how good the procedure went/ so basically the skill?
most crucial aspect to good surgery outcome
how good the procedure went/ so basically the skill?
what to worry about with palatntine access
greater palantine vessles (anatomic factor that could be a factor for no surgery)
pain control with surgery
- pre appointment ibuprofen will decrease post-op pain
- anesthesia and hemostasis
- regional block with marcaine preferred for oain control and longer duration anesthesia
Local infiltration in surgery?
with 1:50K epi for hemostasis in oral mucosa and away from skeletal muscles
average blood loss is? factors?
9.5 ml and time is the biggest factor
50% less blood loss when using 1:50K vs 1:100L epi
regional block with?
marcaine (with local infiltration of 1:50K epi – stll can use in cardio patients becauase it is local)
types of flap designs
- semi-lunar – NEVER INDICATED
- USE FULL THICKNESS- MUCOPERIOSTEAL
- intra sulcular
- submarginal mucogoingival flap
- 2 mm above and below!!
- papillary based incision
flap we like
submarginal
osteotomy
5mm
removal of cortical and cancellous bone
root end resection dimension
3mm ***
root end resection bevel
zero degree bevel allows for less leakage and
maintain more tooth structure
dye and inspection used?
looking for additional canals or cracks present
root resection importance **
When resect - at least 3mm – and know why and we retroprep in 3mm so effectively we treat 6mm of a tooth with surgery
So we can treat 6 with only taking out 3m
retroprep **
3mm cavity prep
use what in retro-prep
ultrasonic tips proposed but RETROFILLS PROVIDE HIGHER SUCCESS RATE
crack formation is a function of
- time
- power
- thickness
retrofill materials
- MTA - basically still the standard
- Super EBA
- Geristore
- AMALGAM IS NOT STANDARD OF CARE
WHY NO AMALGAM
dimensionally unstable – can expand in root envronemtn and can cause cracks and long term failure
- breaks seal by expanding
WHY NO AMALGAM
dimensionally unstable – can expand in root envronemtn and can cause cracks and long term failure
- breaks seal by expanding
can see inflammation
MTA advantages
- hydrophilic
- more biocompatible
- sealing abilities
- margin adaption
- not adversely function with blood
sutures use?
6-7.0
more zero’s – more fine
absorbable sutures
- vicryl
- least inflammation when compared to silk and prolene (non-absorbable) - monocryl
- chromic gut
non-absorbable sutures
- silk - not ideal because of wicking
2. prolene
post op if sinus exposure
augmentin 875 mg bid for 10 days
.5% neosynephrine or OTC nasal decongestants
remove sutures when
2-3 days which promotes better healing
remove sutures when
2-3 days which promotes better healing