Micromechanics- Shear Lag Theory 1 Flashcards
Stress transfer for a short, stiff well-bonded fibre
Tensile stress is transferred from the matrix to the fibre by means of interfacial shear stress
What does higher strain in the matrix than the fibre lead to?
The matrix lagging behind in the vicinity of the fibre. Means the stress in the fibre will be high will be high in the centre of the fibre and low at the ends. Also means interfacial shear stress is 0 in the centre of the fibre and high at the ends
Matrix annuli
Rings of matrix around a fibre
Relating shear at some distance from centreline of fibre to interfacial shear stress
τ(ρ)=τi x r/ρ
Where ρ is distance from centreline
τi is the interfacial shear stress
r is the radius of the short fibre
Difference between the displacement of the matrix at some radius R and that at the interface formula
(uR-ur)=(τi r/Gm)ln(R/r)
Where u is displacement of the matrix (from integration of differentials)
Gm is the shear modulus of the matrix
r is the radius of the short fibre
τi is the interfacial shear stress
Assumptions for difference between displacement of matrix formula
R is assumed to be remote enough from the fibre that the matrix strain is uniform.
The ratio R/r is related to packing of fibres and therefore the fibre volume fraction ff.
Can assume hexagonal array for various packing efficiency equations
Formula for stress in the short fibre along its length
σf=Efεc(1-cosh(nx/r)sech(ns))
Where Ef if YM of fibre
n has its own formula
s=L/r (half length over r) which is aspect ratio
εsubc is strain of composite
x is distance along fibre from the centre of the fibre
What is the interfacial shear stress related to?
The change in fibre stress along the fibre
Formula for interfacial shear stress along the fibre length
τi=(n/2)EfεcSinh(nx/r)Sech(ns)
Formula for n
n=(2Em/(Ef(1+νm)ln(1/ff)))^1/2
Variation of n with fibre volume fraction
Starts low. Curves up slowly getting faster close to ff=1. Although most short fibre composites don’t go above ff=0.4. Carbon fibre in epoxy lowest, glass fibre in unsaturated polyester next up, SiC fibre in glass fair bit higher. n goes from 0 to about 3
Fibre stress vs length along fibre graph for carbon fibre in epoxy and SiC in glass and different aspect ratios
For a constant ff, e.g 0.3. Zero at ends. Maximum in the middle. Get more and more square as aspect ratio s increases. To low an aspect ratio means even centre of fibre not supporting the maximum it could. Aspect ratios need to be higher for carbon fibre in epoxy than for SiC in glass to have middle reach maximum. 50 enough for C but 10 enough for SiC.
Why are there differences in stress in fibres along their length for C in epoxy and SiC in glass?
Carbon fibres stiffer than SiC so can support a higher stress. When fibre-p/matrix stiffness mismatch is significant (C in epoxy) higher aspect ratios are needed than when mismatch not as significant (SiC in glass)
Interfacial shear stress vs length along fibre graphs for carbon fibre in epoxy and SiC in glass and different aspect ratios
Zero in middle. Higher aspect ratio means flatter for longer until near ends where sharp increase of decrease. Lower s means shorter flat section or diagonal and curves up or down further from ends. s makes little difference for C but big difference for SiC. Higher interfacial shear stress values for SiC as change in fibre stress along fibre is more pronounced
What happens to fibre stress vs length along fibre graphs if ff increased?
For a given aspect ratio the maximum stress observed in the middle is higher if not maximum or sustains maximum for greater length