Micro Theme 1 : 4 Flashcards
Adv of indirect tax
-internalise externality : social welfare maximised
-raise gov revenue : can be used on other externality such as education
DisAdv of indirect tax
-difficult to know size of externality due to imperfect info
-conflict in between the gov to increase revenue and solving externality
-inelastic demand : tax ineffective at reducing production
-Black Market
-taxes are political unpopular
-regressive : poor spend larger % of income on indirect tax then poor
Examples of indirect tax
Landfill taxes, fuel duties, alcohol duties, tobacco duties, air passenger duties and sugar taxes
Adv of Subsidies (solves positive externality in consumption)
-SOL and social welfare maximised
-can encourage small businesses bringing equality and exports
DisAdv of subsidies
-Gov spend a lot of money : Opportunity cost
-they are difficult to target as size of externality is unknown
-subsidies causes inefficiency as firms become reliant to gov
-once implemented, difficult to remove
Max/min price adv
Can be placed on the SOL MSB=MSC
to help increase social welfare
-max price helps make goods affordable, whilst minimum ensures producers get a fair price. Can reduce poverty and increase equality
Max/min price DisAdv
Distortion of price signals, excess supply/demand
-difficult for gov to know where to set the price as itll be difficult to know the size of externality and the affects on excess supply and demand
-both can lead to black markets
And bribes and also discriminatory policies in allocating goods
Examples of max and min prices
Manhattan maximum prices for rent control
Venezuela black market creation as there’s price caps on milk, toilet paper, medcine (no profit at low prices )
Scotland : minimum price on alcohol, however poverty people who are addicted will become poorer
Adv of tradable pollution permits
Government control number of permits, control supply so increase social welfare
-government incrsss revenue by selling permits and fining firms
-encourages investment in green technology
-firms can make decision whether to cut pollution or buy permits. Helps encourage efficiency
Dis of tradable pollution permits
-expensive to monitor and control, only work if monitored properly, impose fine large enough
-raise cost for business, will pass onto consumers
-difficult to know how many permits the government should allow
US trading sulphur scheme
Reduced sulphur dioxide by 40%
The EU Emission trading scheme 2005
21% reduction in green house gases
State provison of public goods adv
-corrects market failure : provides important goods like street lights which increase social welfare
-incrsss equality as it ensures everyone has access to basic goods
-benefits of the goods itself : NHS
-government can ensure efficiency : develop !
State provision of public goods disadvantage
-expensive : opportunity cost + administrative costs
-since market is not invoked, government may produce wrong combination of goods, no price signals
-government may be inefficient as they are not incentivised to cut cost
-corruption !
Provison of information
-consumers act rationally
-using policies make demand more elastic in LR is helps indirect taxes to become more effective at reducing output