Micro part 9- Price discriminating monopolies, Oligopoly Flashcards
What is Price discrimination
- when a firm sells a different price to different customers for the same product
What are the conditions of price discrimination
- The seller must have some price making power e.g. barriers to entry to prevent competition
- The seller must be able to separate the markets to prevent those buying the good at a lower price selling it on themselves at a higher price
- Must face different PED in different markets
What is First degree price discrimination
- This is where each consumer is paying the maximum they would be willing to pay so consumer surplus is completely eroded and turned into producer surplus
- P = MR because TR from previous units stays the same
Why is First degree price discrimination Unlikely to happen in real world
- firms need info on each consumer’s willingness to pay
- hard to separate markets
- need high levels of market power
What is second degree price discrimination
- Consumers receive different prices based on the volume purchased
- If consumer buys Q2 then pays lowest price of P2 but if buys Q0 then pays higher price of P0
What is third degree price discrimination
- Charging different prices to different segments of the market based on: time, location etc.
- Markets need to be segmented so consumers in lower priced market cannot buy from higher prices market
- Charge higher prices where PED is more inelastic, lower price where PED is more elastic
What are the advantages of price discrimination
- Can benefit a group that may have not originally been able to afford a certain good.
- greater access to merit goods leads to positive externalities
- Make markets more contestable in l.r. e.g. low cost airlines use p.d. to fill their planes
- An increase in output because of firms selling extra units at a lower price can help exploit EoS and therefore reduce LRAC
why does price discrimination benefit a group that may have not originally been able to afford a certain good.
- This occurs because they have a high degree of market power so can control prices as are price makers and if they can segment markets.
- This benefits those in the lower price market and if they could not afford the good before discrimination then there is an increase in social welfare and equity.
What are the Disadvantages of price discrimination
- Lead to predatory pricing where firms cross-subsidise from the higher priced market so can set prices below cost which drives out competition and increases market power
- It reduces consumer surplus/eqaulity in most cases. 3. Reduces consumer welfare, turns consumer surplus into producer surplus.
- This can strengthen monopoly power and turn it into higher prices in l.r
What are the Characteristics of monopolistic competition
- Differentiated g/s, but close substitutes so XED is high. Presence of advertising.
- There is independence, firms are not concerned with how rival firms react to price and output decisions
- Low barriers to entry/exit
- Many firms, each with low market power
- There is a downwards sloping demand curve so firms have some degree of price setting
- Imperfect information
Short run price and output in respect to monopolistic competition
- In the short run, profit maximise where MC=MR and can make ANP.
- There are higher prices, creating a loss in consumer surplus and welfare in the short run
Long run price and output in respect to monopolistic competition
- In the long run, new firms are incentivised to join the market by profits, which they can due to low barriers to entry
- This increases supply which decreases price, competing away abnormal profits
- It also makes the demand more elastic since there are now more substitutes, and it shifts to the left
- Firms may attempt to stay in the short run ANP by differentiating product and innovating
Describe how choice is affected by monopolistic competition
- Differentiated products in the market, means consumers can makes decisions over which goods may maximise their utility, leading to an increase in consumer welfare
- Advertising by firms allows consumers to identify which g/s will maximise their utility, further maximising welfare
Is monopolistic competition productively efficient or inefficient
- productively inefficient
- Achieved when operating at the lowest point on AC curve
3 . On the diagram, operate where MC=MR, so price is P1, which is higher than P2 - This is because many firms means firms cannot fully exploit their fixed factors because mass production is difficult
- This causes them to produce at an output below the MES
- This means that firms operate at a level of output below optimum capacity
Is monopolistic competition allocatively efficient or inefficient
- Allocatively inefficient
- Diagram shows P < MC since firms operate where MC=MR
- This means the value that consumers place on the last unit bought is greater than the cost of producing that unit (good is under-produced)
- This means consumer welfare is reduced
Describe the effect of monopolistic competition on innovation/dynamic efficiency
- Consumers may see higher levels of innovation and higher quality goods
- Occur because in the short run, there is the presence of ANP as seen by diagram
- This means there are funds available to invest in product innovation, which can increase consumer welfare
- Firms are incentivised to do so as it can further differentiate their product (non-price competition).
- Due to lack of perfect information it can prevent other firms from benefiting from their innovations which can increase their profits in the long run
- Means potential for higher profits and low price for consumers with better quality goods
What is Non-price competition
- Where firms use factors like packaging or advertising to increase demand for their products, over price.
What are the characteristics of oligopoly
- Small number of firms each with significant market share
- Some product differentiation as a form of non-price competition
- There are barriers to entry/exit but differ between industries
- There’s interdependence between firms. They are mutually dependant since each firm is affected by its rival’s decisions
- This interdependence may mean firms react unpredictably
Describe the kinked demand curve
Kinked demand curve
- An oligopoly can observe current prices but must anticipate rival reactions to changes in price
- If the firm raises price then assumed rival firms are less likely to follow so demand is relatively elastic above P0 due to the substitution effect
- If the firm lowers price then assumed rival firms are likely to follow so demand is relatively inelastic below P0
What are the criticisms of the kinked demand curve
- no explanation of how this ‘sticky’ price is achieved
2. cannot predict what happens to output if MC changes since there’s discontinuity in the MR curve
What is the significance of product differentiation
- It means firms face a downwards sloping demand curve.
- This means firms can raise prices without losing all its demand since the product has close but not identical substitutes.
- This means the firm is a price maker
- It means consumers have a wider range of choice. 5. This may increase utility for some consumers which can increase consumer welfare
- It means prices are more stable since firms can maintain or increase market share by non-price competition
What is game theory
- Used to predict the outcome of a firms’ decision when it has incomplete information about others
What is duopoly
- market structure in which there are two firms producing with each other
What is Dominant strategy
- the strategy a firm adopt irrespective of the strategy of other firms
What is Nash equilibrium
- Nash equilibrium – the optimal strategy for all firms
What are payoffs
- Payoffs – the possible outcomes associated with the various combinations of strategy
What does game theory say about dominant strategy
- Any equilibrium where firms are maximising collective profits is unstable since by lowering price then one firm can increase individual profits
- This means the dominant strategy will be the one where they lower price and the equi. payoff is where joint profits are at their lowest
How may firms be tempted to compete
- Firms can either compete of collude
- May be tempted to compete, outcome is Qpc and Ppc
- either on price, output or non-price
- most likely to be characterised by non-price competition
Why might firms engage in collusion
- Could engage in collusion where interdependence encourages firms to join together and act as if they were a collective monopoly
- explicit where there’s an open agreement on price/output strategy (cartel)
- implicit where there’s an unwritten agreement not to compete
- needs a credible punishment strategy
When is collusion in a oligopoly more likely
- firms want to maximise l.r. profits
- price reductions will be quickly matched by retaliating firms
- when it’s more difficult to conceal a price reduction
When is collusion in a oligopoly less likely
- there are many firms in an industry with lower barriers to entry
- Firms have surplus capacity
- Effective legal frameworks to prevent/deter