Micro 18 - Competition Policy Flashcards
Who enacts competition policy?
> In the UK, the main regulator is called the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA).
Beneath them there are regulatory bodies who are specialised regulators who look over specific industries and companies operating those industries. (ORR, CAA, OFCOM, OFWAT, OFGEM).
In the EU, there’s the European Competition Commission, who oversee competition within the entire single market.
What are the aims of competition policy?
> PUBLIC INTEREST
- Prevent excessive pricing.
- Promote competition.
- Ensure quality, standards and choice.
- Regulate natural monopolies/ ensure effective privatisation of natural monopolies.
- Promote technological innovation.
When will competitive authorities intervene? - List
- Anti-trust and Cartel Agreements
- Investigate mergers
- Liberalise concentrated markets
- Monitor state aid control
When will competitive authorities intervene? - anti-trust and cartel agreements
> i.e. collusive agreements, mainly in oligopoly market where monopoly outcome could occur, hence harming public interest.
When will competitive authorities intervene? - investigate mergers
> In the UK, if any merger creates a market share greater than 25%, there will be investigation.
When will competitive authorities intervene? - monitor state aid control
> i.e. in the EU we know there’s a huge agricultural subsidy scheme.
If there’s excessive subsidies in one country it shouldn’t distort competition or trade in another country.
Monopoly regulation - list
- Price regulation
- Quality control/performance targets
- Profit control covering costs and adding percentage return on capital employed.
- Windfall taxes on profit.
- Merger policy.
- Privatisation.
- Deregulation.
- Reducing trade barriers.
Monopoly regulation - price regulation main points
> A good way is to prevent price increase greater than yearly RPI (fair).
Stricter is RPI-X regulation which restricts price increase to below RPI by ‘X %’, idea to promote efficiency savings.
RPI +/- k, where k represents a % where enough profits can be made to allow for capital investment.
Idea is to set max price so there’s greater output, lower prices and so more competitive.
Monopoly regulation - price regulation cons
- Level of X/K? Presuming there’s perfect information. If X is set too high may lead to firms shutting down. If X is too low there may not be the competitive outcomes that this is meant to promote. If K is too low firms may shut, vice versa.
- Cost? Costly and time consuming for regulatory bodies to go in and investigate in firms. Tax payer bears the cost so there’s an OC especially if ‘X, K’ are wrong.
- Incentive to keep low X - not fair.
- Regulatory capture - best regulators are those who have worked in the industry in question so they might have good contacts in that industry.
Monopoly regulation - quality control/performance targets
> e.g. trains - limit delays, gas and electricity can’t cut supply, NHS - GP seeing set no. of patients, react to calls in 8 mins or less.
But there may be unintended consequences. E.g. GPs may take shortcuts, companies may say journey times take longer i.e. ‘game the system’.
Monopoly regulation - profit control covering costs and adding % return on capital employed
> Long-term benefits of capital investment so regulation gives greater return on profits for doing so.
But:
-asymmetric info - ‘over’ employ.
- incentive to increase costs for monopolists.
-incentive for monopolists to over-employ capital.
Monopoly regulation - windfall taxes on profit
> Worsens monopoly outcomes as shifts MC upwards, rising prices further and reducing Q.
Promotes tax evasion/avoidance and under-reporting of profit.
Risk of less innovation and dynamic efficiency as less profit after tax.
Monopoly regulation - merger policy
> Break up merger or if causes monopoly in certain area they could force company to sell stores or outlets in that area.
If causes 25% +.
Monopoly regulation - deregulation
> market-liberalising policies promoting competition.
Monopoly regulation - evaluation
- Level of information.
- Cost vs benefit. Admin costs, expensive. Especially if not effective.
- Regulatory capture.
- Benefits of monopoly: dynamic efficiency, natural monopoly (wasteful allocation of resources, inefficiency).