micro Flashcards

1
Q

normal etc good

A

derivative wealth <0 inferiorio 0-1 normal 1+ luxury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

giffen good

A

own price derivative positive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

elasticity

A

dx/dw*w/x

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

hicksian comp

A

e(p’, u0) - w

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

sluts comp

A

p’*x(p, w) - w

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Roy

A

x = - grad(p)/grad(w) of v(p, w)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Shephard’s lemma

A

h= grap(p) e(p, u)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

EV

A

e(p0, u1) - w
v(p0, w+EV)=u1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

CV or wtp

A

w - e(p1, u0)
v(p1, w-CV)=u0

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

CV >< EV

A

Normal EV>CV
inferior EV<CV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Hotelling lemma

A

y(p) = grad(p) pi(p)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Shephard’s lemma production

A

z=grad(w) c
cond factor demand corresp, cost function

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

certainty equivalent

A

u(CE)=u(x) CE \sim x
int u(x) dF(x)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Risk and shape of u

A

averse u concave (u’‘<0)
neutral linear
lover convex

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Absolute risk av

A

-u’‘(x)/u’(x)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Cara

A

1-exp(-Rx) / R

17
Q

crra

A

x^(1-r)/1-r

18
Q

proof WL assumptions and steps

A

LNS p»0
LNS = spend entire wealth
market good 1 clears
sum across individuals = 0
P>0 so sum X2 - w2 = 0

19
Q

Utility poss convex

A

Assume convex prod and cons + concave ut
need feasible and ui<u(x) for all i
take (x,y) (x’,y’) feasible. (x’‘,y’’) lincomb feasible
u(x’’)>=lincomb(u(x) u(x’)) by concavity for all i. done

20
Q

WE z<0

A

WE p>=0 (with strong monotonicity =, also z=0) iff
-y<0, py=0
-xi=xi(p, pw) for all i
-sum xi
- sum wi= yi*
=> follow from i, iii
<= take xi=xi(p, pw), y=sum(xi-wi)
py
=sum(px-pw)=0 bc by LNS pw=px

21
Q

Existance

A

P»0. By H0, can price unit simplex. sum p = 1

zl+(p) = Max (zl(p), 0)
alpha(p)= sum(pl+zl+(p))
f(p)= 1/alpha(p) * (p + zl+(p))

Brower fixed point E p=f(p)

WL pz(p)=0

22
Q

Warp multivalued

A

(p, w) (p’, w’) x in x(p,w) x’ in x(p’, w’)
p’x<w’ x in x
px’<w x’ in x

23
Q

Probability premium

A

take middle point ex 16 4 is 10
u(10)=(1/2-p)u(4) + (1/2+p)u(16) (–, ++)

24
Q

SODS

A

F sods G if integral 0-x F-G dt <0 for all x in range

25
Q

elasticity of subs

A

1/1-p (x^p+y^p)^1/p p neg inf leont, inf subs, 1 cobb

26
Q

WA

A

p z(p) diff and pz(p’)<=0 implies p’z(p)>0

27
Q

Necessity WA

A

esistono 2, buttali in Y* come py<=0 p’y<=0 e ce l’hai xk eq prices but different z

28
Q

Sufficiency WA

A

Take 2 eq. Lincom p’‘y<0 easy
WL pz(p’’) or p’ negative <=
Suppose one. But z(p) in Y implies p’‘z(p)<=0
Can WA only if z=z. So 3 demands same prices multiples H0

29
Q

WE in crs

A

(p, x(p, pw), y(p)=z(p)
py<=0 for all y necessary in PMP
z(p) in Y feasible from market clearing
py*(p)=pz(p)=0 WL maximize profits

30
Q

PMP py

A

for all y in Y, py*>=py

31
Q

Sum of x* in F/STWE

A

sumpx=sumw=pw+sum py*
w+sum y*