MF Inheritance Flashcards

1
Q

what is multifactorial inheritance?

A

traits determined by combo of multiple factors (genes, environment, number and impact vart, threshold effect)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

how might MF inheritance appear in an FHx?

A

clustering, no clear pattern

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

how common are multifactorial conditions?

A

5% incidence @ birth, 60% population prevalence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what are some common congenital MF conditions? adult-onset? gen pop exs?

A

congenital: CL/P, ONTds, CHD
adult: diabetes, heart disease, epilepsy, affective disorders
gen: height, intelligence, blood pressure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what types of genetic changes are invovled in MF inheritance/conditions? environmental factors?

A

susceptibilty genes, modifiers, epigenetic modification

diet, exercise, teratogens, infections, smoking, trauma, stress, pollutants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what are continuous traits (MF)?

A

quantitative trait, follow bell-shaped distribution (i.e. height)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what are discontinuous traits?

A

qualitative traits (threshold effect, trait is absent or present - CHD)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what are some complications with studying of MF conditions?

A

often more difficutls due to contribution environmental factors

predictive testing is often not possible

testing may determine that is an increased susceptibility

studies strive to determine heritability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

how can twin studies help us understand qual/discontinuous traits and their etiology? any limits?

what role do family studies play?

A

the difference in concordance btwn MZ and DZ twins supports genetic contribution to etiology

disease concordance <100 in MZ or 100% in DZ twins suggests role of nongenetic factors in etiology

limits: usually share the same environment
family: generates relative risk or risk ratio compared to risk in gen pop

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what model can help explain the combined effect of genetic and environmental factors and explain the presence of discontinuous traits?

A

threshold model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

where do recurrence risks for MF come from? what is the generally accepted risk? is this always the case? if not, ex?

A

empiric data

2-5%

nope - look it up!! varies based on condition, features, and severity of presentation, FHx, and presence/absence of other risk factors

i.e. unilateral cleft lip vs. bilateral cleft lip & palate (higher)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

how do we generally think about recurrence risks (for MF) and adjust them?

A
  • depends of # of affected relatives and degree of relatedness
  • RR to FDR is greater than gen. pop (risk drops sharply for more distantly related individuals)
  • RR increases proportionately to the number of affected individuals in a family
  • RR typically higher if disorder is in the more severe range
  • higher if proband is of the less commonly affected sex
  • quoted as avg (true risk in family may be higher or lower)
  • an vary from one pop to another
  • understanding RR in context of background risk and other known contributing factors
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

pyloric stenosis more commonly impacts what sex? where is a good place to start when looking for MF risks?

A

male

Harper’s

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

who is considered you index patient when looking at MF inheritance and risks?

A

the affected person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what should we consider when counseling about MF conditions?

A
  • RR are empiric (based on populations, not individuals)
  • depends on disease incidence
  • 1/2 sibs are SDR (not FDR)
  • consider MF etiology when developing a DDx
  • discuss background risks
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly