Metal on metal hip Flashcards
metal on metal - risk factors
Implant factors
- > 36mm stemmed head
- < 48mm resurfacing head
- ASR implant
Patient factors
- renal insuffiency
- malpositioning of prothesis
- obesity BMI> 30
- metal sensitivity
- immunosupressed/ steroids
- sex - female
- bilateral resurfacings/ metal on metal THR
- pseudotumours
High risk group
Resurfacing
- female
- ASR
- male with <48mm head
Stemmed
- >36mm head - volumetric wear
Low risk group
Resurfacing
- male
- head>48mm
- non-ASR
Stemmed <36mm head
Assessment of low risk metal on metal
Based on MHRA guidelines
Routine
- bloods - cobalt and chrome - abnormal if >7parts per billion
- Xray
- Oxford hip score
Symptomatic
- MARS MRI scan - to look for muscle and bone damage, and fluid around hip
Frequence
based on ODEP rating of the implant
- 10a - 1yr, 7yrs and 10yrs, then 3yrly
- no 10a rating - annually for 5yrs, then two yearly till year 10, then 3yrly
Assessment of high risk patients (metal on metal)
Annual assessment
- bloods - cobalt chrome >7ppb
- OHS
- xray
- MARS MRI scan - if deterioration in OHS or elevated bloods
- rule out infection if first presentation
Management of metal on metals hips?
Low risk group
- continued observation
Moderate risk group
- moderate pain
- cystic tumour - MHRA suggests these can be observed
- moderate bloods
- Refer to specialist MDT
Severe risk group
- pain
- solid pseudotumour
- muscle damage
- REVISE
surgical considerations and surgical plan for MOM hip revision
surgical considerations:
- soft tissue destruction
- possible need for greater constraint - dual mobility/ constrained liner
- increased constraint causes greater wear
Surgical plan
- rule out infection
- discussed in MDT
- experienced surgeon
- aggressive debridement of the metalosis
- samples for infection
- THR with adequate constraint
contraindications for MOM resurfacing?
Contraindications:
- Bone loss - severe osteoporosis, insufficient bone stock, extensive osteonecrosis, large bone cysts (rheumatoid)
- Patient factors - obesity, metal hypersensitivity, chronic renal disease, hip dysplasia, young female
advantages of resurfacing
- retain bone stock
- improved proprioception
- improved ROM
- improved wear
- no PE induced osteolysis
- better restoration of hip biomechanics
causes of revision of resurfacing
decreasing order of frequency:
- fracture - most common
- loosening/ lysis
- infection
- ARMD
- pain
- dislocation
ALVAL, ARMD and pseudotumour
ARMD
adverse reaction of metal debris
term to describe joint failure associated with pain, sterile effusion and metallosis
ALVAL
adverse lymphocytic vasculitis associated lesion
- delayed hypersensitivity like reaction
- found in soft tissues at revision show immunological response
- can lead to periprosthetic osteolysis
Pseudotumour
- causes extensive collateral damage
- synovial like biomembrane forms leading to bone resorption and osteolysis - production of IL1, collagenase and TNF