Meta-ethical Theories Flashcards
Naturalism
Values can be defined in terms of some natural property of the world
Intuitionism
Basic moral truths are indefinable but self-evident
Emotivism
Ethical terms simply evince approval or disapproval
Naturalist arguments
BKEBFAPF
Bentham, Kant, Evolution, FH Bradley, Foot, Aquinas, Popper, Fletcher
Bentham
(N) Goodness= pleasure, measure happiness using hedonic calculus- cognitive as we have criteria
Kant
(N) Categorical imperatives that are right for entire group of people
Evolution
(N) Whatever gives evolutionary advantage is good
FH Bradley
(N) Universal and concrete duty through observation of society and our place in it
Foot
(N) “moral evil is a kind of natural defect”, draws on Aristotle’s observations of nature’s patterns, oak tree+ Kropotkin
Aquinas
(N) Can perceive morals from telos
Popper
(N) Least pain is morally correct
Fletcher
(N) Agape is morally correct
Intuitionist arguments
MPR
Moore, Prichard, Ross
Moore
(I) Naturalism commits naturalistic fallacy- good is “totally indefinable”, either recognise or not, “yellow”, Dylan Roof simply morally blind-> Warnock- simply sense of bewilderment, claiming 6th sense with no agreement on what it is
Prichard
(I) Not only good indefinable, also the idea of “obligation”- reason collects facts and intuition chooses greater obligation= more developed