Mental Illness and Creativity Flashcards

1
Q

Structure of Kyaga et al’s (2011) study

A

Comparing two conditions:

  • “case” group of individuals who had obtained treatment for schizophrenia, bipolar, depression, as well as their relatives
  • control group: people who had had no inpatient treatment, matched to individuals in the case group based on gender and birth year.

And measuring how many people in each group are in a “creative” profession

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

[ Kyaga et al. (2011) ]

What were the mental illnesses examined in the case group?

What were some “creative” occupations?

A

Schizophrenia, bipolar, depression

University prof, visual artist, designer, display artist, musicians, authors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Results of Kyaga et al. (2011)

A
  • cases starkly overrepresented in creative professions
  • specifically, people with bipolar disorder, and non-pathological siblings of people with schizophrenia
  • people with schizophrenia had no increased rate of creative profession compared to controls, but an increase rate in the subgroup of artistic occupations
  • unipolar depression: neither people with the condition nor their siblings differed from controls.

(Hi Laura, if you’re wondering, this info is from the abstract of the Kyaga et al article: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.110.085316 )

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are some critiques of Kyaga’s study? (Brought up in class)

A
  • Reserachers examined only one class of creative professionals
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q
  • Results of Taylor et al. (2007) meta-analysis
A

Examined direction of relationship: Having a mood disorder doesn’t mean that one will be more creative, but creative people are more likely to have mood disorders.

Creative accomplishment & behaviours were associated with bipolar

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Findings of Power et al. (2015)

A

Took genetic profiles of people with risk for schizophrenia, risk for bipolar, and polygenic risk. Correlated them with membership in national artistic societies.

POLYGENIC risk score associated with increased odds (1.7) of belonging to a national artistic society
Schizophrenia risk scores explained .24% of variance in creativity
Bipolar disorder scores explained .26% of variance in creativity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Simonton (2014) conducted a _______ study.

A

Historimetric.

Historimetry is the historical study of human progress, either of populations or certain individuals. May be measured by the number of references to an individual and/or their discoveries. Is an attempt to quantify and measure human progress.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Structure of Simonton (2014) study

A

Identified 204 historical creative geniuses, from 2 independent historimetrical samples. Included scientists, thinkers, artists, writers, and composers.

Creative eminence was rated by a third party, and psychopathology was independently rated.

Psychopathology was rated on a scale of 0-4 (0 = no psychopathology, 4 = severe psychopathology) based on biographical materials.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Results of Simonton (2014)

A

While the relationship between creative eminence and psychopathology was insignificant, differences in creative eminence BETWEEN professions were observed.

For artists, writers, composers, and thinkers, their creative eminence increased with the amount of psychopathology exhibited.

For scientists, creative eminence increased when a level of psychopathology reached a rating between 1 and 2 (out of 4). Any psychopathology ratings higher than this, and their creative eminence dropped.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are potential mechanisms for the link between mental illness and creativity?

A
  • Balancing selection hypothesis: Argument that alleles with disadvantageous consequences may increase fitness in other areas, so they stay in the population.
    So creativity and divergent thinking styles may be an advantage of alleles that confer susceptibility to mental disorders
  • People with schizophrenia are less constrained by common sense (Owen & David (2007); study where they were less constrained by common sense when solving logical syllogisms)
  • In bipolar disorder, mania and hypomania are associated with augmented productivity.
  • People with mood swings and people at risk for bipolar disorder scored higher on measures of creativity. Many people with bipolar recognize creativity as an aspect of their condition.
  • Positive symptoms* of schizophrenia linked to creativity styles
  • neurological differences; neurotransmitters and the genetic component of neurotransmitter balance
  • personality traits: openness to experience (Big 5/HEXACO): people with high O are more likely to have mental health concerns; approach-avoidance: people with high approach may experience greater creativity
  • developmental antecedents: adverse experiences can contribute to mental illness development, do they contribute to creativity as well?
  • in contrast to negative symptoms of schizophrenia
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Title card: The “No” side

A

Hello, this title card is practical if you are studying the material in order, and/or just becoming familiar with the material. It is probably useless if you are studying with cards shuffled. :)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Briefly explain the no slide (will fill in later)

A

:)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Cognitive biases may be influencing people to perceive an illusory correlation between creativity and mental illness. What are those biases? (2)

A

Base rate fallacy: tendency to focus on specific, vivid examples, and ignore more relevant but generic information

Availability heuristic: estimating the frequency of an event by the ease with which examples come to mind. For example, vivid examples of artists with mental illness such as Van Gogh and Kurt Cobain come to mind and are easily recalled. This can cause one to overestimate the frequency of the phenomenon occurring.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Potential limitations of research in this area

A
  1. The lack of control groups, or inadequate control groups.
  2. Failure to control for potential confounds
  3. Recall bias and role adherence
  4. No random sampling or blinding
  5. Biases of historimetric studies
  6. Overlap between symptoms and creative process
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Lack of control groups/inadequate control groups - examples

A
Kyaga et al. (2011) examined many classes of creative professions and only one class of non-creative profession (accountants and auditors).
Can’t draw conclusions if experimental design doesn’t allow hypothesis to be falsified.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Lack of control for potential confounds - examples

A

Gender: men have more externalizing mental health problems (adhd, impulse disorder), women have more internalizing
Men may be socialized into roles such as engineering, which are still creative, while conventionally artistic careers may be more socially acceptable for women.

Age: mental illnesses have different prevalence over the lifespan, for example, anorexia and bulimia are more prevalent in young adult years

Socioeconomic status, education, and life adversity all affect health outcomes over the lifespan

17
Q

Problems with recall bias and role adherence - examples

A

People who believe in the link may exhibit demand characteristics; if they believe in the link or want to support the hypothesis, they may bias their responses, eg. If they believe they are creative they may recall more mood disorder symptoms

18
Q

Problems with participant selection and researcher/participant blinding

A
  • self-selection: people who are interested in the link, or who believe in it, or who deal with mental illness themselves, may be more interested in signing up for the study.
  • self-selection due to personality traits: people with higher openness to experience may be more likely to sign up for the study
  • Taylor et al. Meta analysis: effect sizes were stronger in studies that DIDN’T do blinding (.72) than studies that did (.41)
  • if we’re looking at exemplary individuals with creative prodigy, our sample size will likely be very small, most of them will be dead, and their rareness will make random sampling hard
19
Q

Biases of historimetric studies

A

Only looking at historical creatives who have passed on; they have sensationalized biographies

20
Q

How do creative processes and mood disorder symptoms overlap?

A

Mood disorders can include a flight of ideas, working into the wee hours of the night, not taking care of oneself…this correlates with creative productivity

21
Q

Measurement/operational inaction difficulties in relation to census data and convenience samples

A

Census and historimetric data doesn’t have continuous data on creativity or mental health scores

If we use student/convenience samples, that are often used for psychological research, we will likely have little to no eminent creative geniuses in our sample.

22
Q

Potential confound for researching link

A

Mood disorder symptoms might exclude people from holding regular jobs and attaining education, and may limit them to more creative jobs

23
Q

Simonton (2019) discusses various complexities in the creativity-MI debate. What are they?

A
  • Who are our “target persons” of interest?
  • Which disorders are we interested in?
  • What kind of creativity are we interested in?
  • If a relationship exists, what kind of relationship is it?
24
Q

Simonton (2019)

“Target persons” issue

A

Are we look