Mental Health: Key Research Flashcards
Who did the study ‘on being sane in insane places’
Rosenhan (1973)
What was study one about in the Rosenhan experiment
study one = Admitting ‘sane’ individuals into psychiatric hospital and the effects of this
What was the aim of study one in the Rosenhan experiment
- To illustrate the problems involved in determining normality and abnormality, in particular:
- Poor reliability of classification systems for mental disorders
- Negative consequences of being diagnosed as abnormal and effects of being institutionalized
What were the research methods used in study one in the Rosenhan experiment
Covert
Field observation
(participant)
What was the sample used in study one of the Rosenhan experiment
12 hospitals across the USA
-The researchers were not the sample but there were 8 people, 3 female and 3 male from a small variety of occupations using fake names and occupations
In the procedure of study one in the Rosenhan experiment, how did the pseudo-patients get admittance to hospital?
and what does this tell us about diagnosis of mental illness?
They attempted to get a diagnosis of schizophrenia by phoning up and using key words like “empty, hollow, thud”
–> this tells us that institutions are unreliable and possible not competent
In the procedure of study one in the Rosenhan experiment, What did the pseudo-patients do once they were in
They acted like themselves, with no schizophrenic symptoms and responded normally
In the procedure of study one in the Rosenhan experiment, what did the pseudo patients make notes on
- Observed and recorded the experience of the institutionalized mentally disordered patient
- Lack of monitoring
- Effect of institution, depersonalized and powerlessness
From the data gathered in study one in the Rosenhan experiment, How did the pseudo-patients collect qualitative data
-They took notes on the institution experience
From the data gathered in study one in the Rosenhan experiment, how did the pseudo-patients collect quantitative data
- Length of days stayed at the institution (7-52 days, average 19 days)
- Number of incorrect diagnosis
- Time staff spent with patients
- % of doctors and nurses responding to questions
From the results in study one in the Rosenhan experiment, how were the pseudo-patients seen as abnormal inside the hospital
Every behaviour was labelled as schizophrenic:
- emotional and unstable
- note taking was seen as part of the disorder
- pacing corridors out of boredom was seen as part of the disorder
- waiting outside the cafeteria was seen as ‘oral acquisitive’ nature of the syndrome
From the results in study one in the Rosenhan experiment, what quantitative results are there that shows that patients were not spoken to or had much interaction with doctors or nurses
- length of stay ranged from 7-52 days, never been detected as sane in 52 days
- 71% of staff ignored patient and only 4% stopped
From the results in study one in the Rosenhan experiment, how long did it take the pseudo-patients to be released from hospital?
What happened even when released
- 7-52 days and average of 19 days
- All except 1 were diagnosed as ‘schizophrenic in remission’ and not as sane
From the conclusions in study one in the Rosenhan experiment, what error of diagnosis was being made and what does the study tell us about the validity of diagnosis
- Schizophrenia = there are deficiencies in the classification system and diagnosed as ‘schizophrenic in remission’
- Diagnosis is very subjective and opinionated
From the conclusion in study one in the Rosenhan experiment, what does the study tell us about the stickiness of labels
- Labels will stay with you, not just labelled as sane after being released but as ‘schizophrenic in remission’
- ‘Doctors and nurses are unable to diagnose patients correctly’