Mens Rea Flashcards

1
Q

What does mens rea relate to?

A

The defendant’s state of mind at the time of committing the offence

Reflects the blameworthiness of the defendant - the intention or knowledge of wrongdoing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the difference between intention and motive in mens rea?

A

Intention is the want of the defendant; motive is why. Motive is only considered when sentencing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define direct intent.

A

The aim, wish, want, or desire of the defendant

Legal test = R v Mohan - ‘a decision to bring about the prohibited consequence’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is indirect/oblique intent?

A

When the defendant’s main purpose of actions is something else but foresaw the consequence of those actions

Legal test - R v Woollin - virtual certainty test.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the two questions in the virtual certainty test?

A
  1. Was the outcome a virtually certain consequence of the defendant’s actions? 2. Did the defendant realize this?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the difference between subjective and objective tests in mens rea?

A

Subjective refers to the actual state of a person’s mind; objective focuses on what a rational person would think.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What legal principle about foresight and intention is established in R v Matthew and Alleyne?

A

Foresight is only evidence of intention, which is a matter for the jury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is recklessness in mens rea?

A

A lower level of mens rea where the defendant is regarded as less culpable

Reckless means taking a risk that the defendant is aware of.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the legal test for recklessness as established in R v Cunningham?

A

The conscious taking of an unjustifiable risk.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is transferred malice?

A

When the mens rea can be transferred from the intended victim to the actual victim

This makes the defendant guilty of an offence against the unintended victim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the two principles under which transferred malice can occur?

A
  • Unintended victim principle
  • Additional victim principle
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the exception to the general rule of transferred malice?

A

Where the defendant had the mens rea of one crime but commits the actus reus of another, they cannot be convicted of either crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does the contemporaneity rule refer to?

A

The coincidence of actus reus and mens rea for a crime to be committed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the two situations where the contemporaneity rule may not apply?

A
  • Continuing acts
  • Series of events as a single transaction
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is strict liability?

A

A category of offence that requires no mens rea in respect of at least one aspect of the actus reus.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is absolute liability?

A

No mens rea needed and actus reus does not need to be voluntary; the defendant is liable due to being found in a certain situation.

17
Q

What are the criteria to determine if an offence is one of strict liability as identified in Gammon (Hong Kong) Ltd v AG?

A
  • Words of the statute imply strict liability
  • It is a regulatory offence
  • Issue of public safety or concern
  • Encourages greater vigilance
  • Carries a small penalty
18
Q

List reasons that justify strict liability.

A
  • Protect the public
  • Promote greater care
  • Easier to enforce
  • Saves court time
19
Q

List reasons that argue strict liability offences are morally wrong.

A
  • Immoral to impose liability on blameless individuals
  • Those showing care should not be penalized
  • No evidence of imposing higher standards