Mens Rea Flashcards

1
Q

CL Intent Requirements

A
  • Conscious object: Conscious objective to bring about a result
  • Knowledge to a virtual certainty: Knowledge that result is virtually certain to occur
  • Mental State Descriptors: Corruptly, Willfully, Maliciously, Intentionally, Knowingly, Recklessly, Negligently
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Malice - CL Definition

A
  • Reckless disregard of an obvious or high risk that a harmful result will happen
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Natural and Probable Consequences Doctrine

A

legal shortcuts that let the fact finders infer intent when there’s no absolute proof of intent to kill

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Standard of Proof for “Purposeful” under the MPC

A

beyond a reasonable doubt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Deadly Weapons Doctrine

A

Shortcut to Mens Rea. Animate or inanimate substance that, as used as intended, is capable of causing death or serious bodily injury. More on the prosecutor to define it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

“Purposeful” under the MPC

A
  • consciously intends to bring about a result
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

“Knowingly” under the MPC

A

Aware of the nature of the conduct and aware that certain circumstances exist

(also, the person is deemed to be aware of these circumstances when they are aware of a high probability that they exist and deliberately avoid learning the truth)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

“Recklessly” under the MPC

A

Conscious disregard of a substantial and justifiable risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Doctrine of Transferred Intent

A

Under both the common law and the MPC, a shooter can be held criminally liable for intentionally killing the other person even if that other person was in fact an unintended victim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

“Negligently” under the MPC

A

Failure to be aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk that circumstances exist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

MPC Silent Mens Rea

A

if mens rea not listed in the statute, then it’s established if the person acted purposely, knowingly, or recklessly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Specific Intent

A

A crime may require not only the doing of an act, but also the doing of it with a specific intent or objective. The existence of a specific intent cannot be conclusively imputed from the mere doing of the act, but the manner in which the crime was committed may provide circumstantial evidence of intent. The importance of specific intent crimes is that they will qualify for additional defenses not available for other types of crimes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Examples of Specific Intent Crimes

A

solicitation, attempt, conspiracy, assault, larceny, robbery, burglary, forgery, false pretenses, embezzlement, and first-degree premeditated murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

General Intent

A

General intent means the defendant has an awareness of all factors constituting the crime; in other words, the defendant must be aware that they are acting in the proscribed way and that any required attendant circumstances exist. The defendant does not have to be certain that all the circumstances exist; it is sufficient that they are aware of a high likelihood that they will occur.

  • A jury may infer the required general intent merely from the doing of the act
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Strict Liability Analysis

A

(5 Steps)
1. Minimum Requirement of Culpability (has to be purposely, knowingly, recklessly, or negligently) attached to each material element
2. Exceptions: Not applied to minor violations like fines/forfeiture
3. States will sometimes adopt the MPC
4. Strict Liability offenses must be violations (fines)
5. Courts can make the strict liability statute a negligence statute (for severe penalties)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Examples of Strict Liability Offenses

A
  • Public Welfare Offenses
  • Minor Violations
  • Statutory Rape: Statutory rape is carnal knowledge of a person under the age of consent. Statutory rape is a strict liability crime, and, therefore, it is not necessary to show lack of consent.
17
Q

Mistake of Fact

A

Ignorance or mistake as to a matter of fact or law

18
Q

When is mistake of fact a defense?

A
  • (a) the ignorance or mistake negates the purpose, knowledge, belief, recklessness or negligence required to establish a material element of the offense; or
  • (b) the law provides that the state of mind established by such ignorance or mistake constitutes a defense.
19
Q

applying mistake of fact to general intent crimes

A

mistake must be reasonable. Honest/good-faith AND reasonable mistake

20
Q

applying mistake of fact to specific intent crimes

A

mistake can be reasonable or unreasonable. Honest mistake/good faith that negates the specific intent required for the crime

21
Q

applying mistake of fact to strict liability crimes

A

mistake is not a defense

22
Q

Moral Wrong Doctrine

A

a defendant can’t invoke a mistake of fact defense if the defendant intended to commit an inherently immoral act

23
Q

Legal Wrong Doctrine:

A

Even if a person honestly and reasonably misunderstood the facts in a way that would cancel out the intent needed to commit a certain crime, they won’t be cleared of wrongdoing if, based on what they believed was true, they would still have been committing a different crime.