Mens Rea Flashcards
Mens Rea
The culpable mental state required for conviction
Four Mental States
- Purposefully/Intentionally
(Acts with the purpose/intention to cause harm) - Knowingly
(Have actual knowledge or awareness of a required material fact) - Recklessly
(Conscious disregard of substantial and unjustifiable risk) - Negligently
(Should have known of substantial and unjustifiable risk)
Two Other Ways Knowledge Can Be Met
Yermian: Constructive knowledge (if a person should have known the material fact)
Jewell: Willful blindness (being deliberately ignorant to the material fact; you knew but chose to look the other way)
Alternative Ways for Establishing Intent
Natural and Probable Consequences Doctrine
Transferred Intent
Natural and Probable Consequences Doctrine
A criminal ∆’s intent to kill may be presumed if the natural and probable consequence of his wrongful act is to cause death.
Considers the surrounding circumstances, including the weapon used and the manner of inflicting the wound.
Transferred Intent
When a defendant acts with an intent to cause harm to one person and that act results in harm to another person, the defendant can be liable for the harm caused
Common Law: D’s guilt is the same if attempts to kill one person but actually kills another instead
CA incorporated Common Law: If intend to kill A and kill A and B, cant transfer intent to B, b/c intent to kill 2 people is different than intent to kill 1
Specific Intent Crimes
Beyond intent to commit the prohibited act
These crimes have a specifically named intent (Burglary: Breaking and entering a structure with the intent to commit a felony therein)
General Intent Crimes
Just the intent to do the act
Strict Liability
∆ is guilty regardless of mental state
Strict Liability Crimes
Crimes that have no intent element; the performance of the unlawful act is enough
Examples: parking ticket, statutory rape, public welfare offenses
Mistake of Fact
Specific intent crimes: mistake of fact may negate mens rea requirement if mistake is honest. Does not need to be reasonable.
General intent crimes: mistake of fact must be honest and reasonable in order to negate the mens rea requirement
Strict liability crimes: Mistake of fact will not affect culpability because there is no mens rea requirement
Mistake of Law
Is not a defense under common law
Ignorance of the law is no excuse