Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Criminal Law > Criminal Law > Flashcards

Criminal Law Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
Civil Procedure 1L flashcards MBE flashcards MPRE flashcards
1
Q

Actus Reus

A

Physical act over which defendant has control, or the failure to act that is actionable by law

Action has to be voluntary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Actus Reus requirements (Voluntary Act)

A

Defendant commits a voluntary act; and

Defendant has physical control over the act, or committed a voluntary act with knowledge of the risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Actus Reus requirements (Failure to act)

A

Defendant fails to act; and
Defendant had a legal duty to act; and
Failure to act caused a social harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When do you have a legal duty to act?

A 
Special relationship 
Contract
Statutory duty
Creation of risk 
Assumption of care
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Mens Rea

A

Culpable mental state required for conviction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

4 Mental States (MPC)

A
  1. Purposefully/Intentionally
    (Acts with the purpose/intention to cause harm)
  2. Knowingly
    (Have actual knowledge or awareness of a required material fact)
  3. Recklessly
    (conscious disregard of substantial and unjustifiable risk)
  4. Negligently
    (should have known of substantial and unjustifiable risk)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Two other ways knowledge can be met

A

Yermian: Constructive knowledge (if a person should have known the material fact)
Jewell: Willful blindness (being deliberately ignorant to the material fact; you knew but chose to look the other way)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Statutory Interpretation

A
  1. Look at plain language of the statute first
  2. Look at legislative history if plain language is not clear
  3. Apply rule of lenity is language is ambiguous/unclear
    (We must adopt the interpretation of the statute that is most favorable to the defendant; in other words, the interpretation that is more likely to lead to the defendant being found not guilty)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Specific intent Crimes

A

Beyond intent to commit the prohibited act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

General Intent Crimes

A

Just the intent to do the act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Strict Liability Crimes

A

Crimes that have no intent requirement

Under common law, when a statute is silent to the mens era, it may or may not be a strict liability crime. Courts look to the text of the statute and the legislative history

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Natural and Probable Consequence

A

A criminal defendant’s intent to kill may be presumed if the natural and probable consequence of his wrongful act is to cause death.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Transferred Intent

A

Common Law: D’s guilt is the same if attempts to kill one person but actually kills another instead
CA incorporated Common Law: If intend to kill A and kill A and B, cant transfer intent to B, b/c intent to kill 2 people is different than intent to kill 1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Mistake of fact (Defense)

A

Specific intent crimes: mistake of fact may negate mens rea requirement is mistake is honest. Does not need to be reasonable.
General intent crimes: mistake of fact must be honest and reasonable in order to negate the mens rea requirement
Strict liability crimes: Mistake of fact will not affect culpability because there is no mens rea requirement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Mistake of Law

A

Is not a defense under common law

Ignorance of the law is no excuse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Three Basic Theft Crimes

A
  1. Larceny
  2. Embezzlement
  3. False Pretenses
17
Q

Elements of Larceny

A
  1. Wrongful taking and
  2. Carrying away
  3. Personal property of another
  4. With the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property
18
Q

Elements of Larceny by Continuing Trespass

A

Same elements as Larceny. Only difference is that the intent to permanently deprive is developed later on

19
Q

Elements of Larceny by Trick

A

Same elements as Larceny. Rule emerged to capture cases where “taking” occurs by deceit

When possession, but not owner ship or title is taken
Victim only intends to convey possession (rental car and dry cleaning example)

The trick or deceit must be the reason the victim transferred possession (victim believes the lie)

20
Q

Elements of Embezzlement

A
  1. Intentional conversion
  2. Of the property of another
  3. By someone who is already in lawful possession of it (or by someone who has been entrusted)
21
Q

False Pretenses

A
  1. False statement of facts that
  2. Causes the victim
  3. To pass title to defendant, and
  4. Defendant must know statement was false, and
  5. Defendant must have intended to defraud the victim

(money counts as title)

22
Q

Elements of Robbery

A
  1. Felonious taking and
  2. Carrying away
  3. Of personal property of another
  4. By threat or force of threat
  5. Taken from victim’s person or in immediate presence of victim
23
Q

Common Law Elements of Burglary

A
  1. Breaking (intruding within a building, no matter how slight)
  2. And entering
  3. Of the dwelling of another
  4. At night
  5. With the intent to commit a felony therein (had to enter with the intent to commit Crim inside)
24
Q

Modern Changes Elements of Burglary

A
  1. Breaking (half of the states)
  2. And entering
  3. Of the building/structure of another
  4. With the intent to commit a felony therein

Majority rule: entry only satisfied without consent
Minority rule: entry satisfied even if the person has right/license to enter with intent to commit a crime

25
Q

California Elements of Burglary

A
  1. Entering
  2. Any structure or any room within a structure
  3. With the intent to commit a felony or theft crime therein

Entering satisfied when entering a commercial building with intent to commit a felony or a theft. (shoplifting statute (only for commercial establishment, not a home): theft > $950)

Entry element may be satisfied if enter with intent to commit theft/felony even if invited/allowed to enter
(Any part of body counts)

26
Q

Entry by Instrumentality

A

When an instrument other than a part of a defendant’s body enters for purpose of committing target crime

27
Q

Actual (“But for”) Causation

A

Determines whether D’s voluntary act or omission is a causal factor

“But for” test: but for D’s voluntary act/ omission, would the social harm have occurred when it did? If no, then D is an actual cause.

28
Q

Proximate Cause

A

When the defendant’s conduct is the direct cause of the social harm (when there are no intervening causes) it would be fair and just to hold the defendant criminally liable

29
Q

Dependent (or responsive) intervening cause

A

Dependent upon D’s voluntary act

D is the proximate cause unless the intervening cause is extremely unusual or bizarre

30
Q

Independent (or coincidental) intervening cause

A

Independent of D’s voluntary act

D is generally relieved of criminal liability (not the proximate cause) unless the intervening cause is foreseeable.

Intervening act is independent if it would have occurred regardless of the D’s voluntary act.

31
Q

Good Samaritan Laws

A

Imposes an affirmative duty on ordinary people to assist others in need

32
Q

Theories of Punishment

A

Retribution: Justice, “eye for an eye”
Incapacitation: Protect the rest of the society form a person
Deterrence: Others don’t want to face the punishment; preventative
Rehabilitation: resolving the underlying issue that drive that crime

33
Q

Yermian

A

When a statute is unclear or ambiguous, courts consider the plain language of the statute and the legislative intent behind the statute to interpret the statute’s meaning. If the meaning is ambiguous based on a review of the plain text and the legislative intent, courts default to the rule of lenity and interpret the statute in the manner that is most advantageous to the defendant.

34
Q

Jury Nullification

A

Jury acting against the rule of law, and determining guilt based on personal sense of justice

35
Q

CA Law Robbery

A 
felonious taking  
property of another 
from person or immediate presence 
accomplished by force or fear 
- Concurrence goes form time of taking up until robber gets into point of relative safety 
- all one act

Criminal Law (13 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions