Memory- Multi Store Model Flashcards
Coding
The way in which information is changed to be stored in memory
Capacity
The amount of info a store can hold
Duration
How long a store can hold memories for
Serial recall
Memory testing method where participants need to repeat information in order
Stores in the multi store model
Sensory register, Short term memory, Long term memory
Sensory memory capacity
Unlimited
Sensory memory duration
1.5-2 seconds
Sensory memory coding
Sense specific (depends on stimuli)
Short term memory coding
Acoustic
Short term memory capacity
7+-2 items
Short term memory duration
18-30 seconds
Long term memory coding
Semantic
Long term memory capacity
Unlimited (potentially)
Long term memory duration
Lifetime (49 yrs)
How does information go from the sensory to short term store
Attention
How does information pass from short term to long term memory
Maintenance rehersal
How does information stay in the STM
Rehearsal loop
How is information moved from long term to short term memory
Retrieval
How is information lost from the sensory memory
Decay
How is information lost from the short term memory
Decay and displacement
How is information lost from long term memory
Retrieval failure or interference
Decay
When a memory disappears due to not being rehearsed
Displacement
When a store runs out of capacity so older information is forgotten
Study supporting STM’s capacity
Miller
Miller study
Used a serial recall task,
Found most people could recall between 5 and 9 items (‘Miller’s magic number’)
Study supporting STM’s duration
Peterson & Peterson
Peterson & Peterson study
Made participants remember a 3 letter trigram and count backwards in 3s,
90% were accurate after 3 seconds but only 2% were after 18 seconds
Study supporting LTM’s duration
Bahrick
Bahrick study
Asked people to recall names of their school year after 49 years,
70% were accurate with cues from the yearbook
Study supporting STM & LTM coding
Baddeley
Baddeley study
Participants had to learn acoustically similar/dissimilar words and semantically similar/dissimilar words.
Performance was worse on semantically similar when recalled after a long time, and worse on acoustically similar words after a short time.
Study supporting separate memory stores
Glanzer and Cunitz
Glanzer and Cunitz study
Serial positioning effect discovered where people are more likely to remember items at the beginning and end of a list showing the primacy and recency effects.
Case study contradicting single STM store
Patient KF
Patient KF case study
Had a motorcycle accident leaving a normal visual STM and a damaged verbal STM
Case study contradicting single LTM store
Patient HM
Patient HM case study
Had hippocampus removed and could not form new explicit (semantic and episodic) memories but could form implicit (procedural)
Contradicting studies for MSM
Patient KF
Patient HM
Supporting studies for MSM
Baddeley
Glanzer & Cunitz