Memory: models of memory Flashcards
Explain Atkinson + Shifrin’s MSM (multi-store model)
- Memory consists of 3 stores -> sensory register, short-term store and a long-term store.
- Info from environment (visual/auditory etc) initially goes to sensory register.
-> not noticeable, however if paying attention, info will pass to the STM. - STM has a finite capacity and duration -> but if info is rehearsed then it can be transferred to LTM.
<- Rehearsal <- Sensory -> sensory register -> (Attention) STM -> (Rehearsal) -> LTM
(SEE NOTES)
(+) explain the primacy effect (MSM)
- evidence of the primacy effect: studies show that ppts are able to recall earlier items better than those in the middle.
-> MSM: earlier items will have been rehearsed better and transferred to the LTM.
-> If rehearsal is prevented by an interference task, the effect disappears.
list the strengths and weaknesses of the MSM
Positive:
- evidence of the primacy effect
- recency effect
- Miller case study on HM
Negative:
- evidence against rehearsal
- oversimplification
(+) explain the recency effect (MSM)
- ppts are able to remember the last few items of a list.
-> STM has a capacity of about 7 -> so words in the middle are displaced from STM by the last few words are heard.
(+) explain how Milner study on HM supports the MSM
- HM suffered severe epilepsy.
- seizures were based in the hippocampus, doctors surgically removed part of the brain around this area.
-> reduced epilepsy but was not able to form long-term memories. - Study supports the idea that different types of memory are in the brain.
(-) explain how rehearsal may not always be involved in memory (MSM)
- in real life people don’t always rehearse info, yet still transfer info into the LTM.
-> Rehearsal is not always needed for LTM and some items can’t be rehearsed (e.g. smells).
(-) explain how the MSM may be oversimplified
- Assumes there is only 1 LTM store and 1 STM store.
-> this is disproved by evidence from brain damaged patients which shows there are different STM and LTM stores.
Explain the features of the WMM
- The STM is an active processor which contains several different stores.
- Central executive is a key component, can be described as attention.
-> has limited capacity and controls ‘slave systems’ that also have a limited capacity.
Phonological loop: holds speech-based info -> made up of the phonological store (inner ear) an an articulatory process (inner voice, rehearses info through repetition).
- Visuo-spatial sketchpad: deals with temporary storage of visual and spatial info.
- Episodic buffer: briefly stores info from subsystems and integrates, along with info from the LTM, to make complete ‘episodes’.
Explain how the WMM is based on experimental evidence
- based off of studies using ‘interference tasks’.
- ppts performing 2 tasks which simultaneously use the same system -> performance will be affected -> e.g. saying ‘the the the’ while silently reading something is very difficult.
-> in the WMM: both tasks use the phonological loop which as a limited capacity -> can’t cope with both tasks. - However, if tasks involve different, systems, performance is not affected.
-> saying ‘the the the’ whilst tracking a moving object (which involves the visuo-spatial sketchpad).
Evaluate the WMM
(+) Shallice + Warrington case study of KF who was brain-damaged -> impaired STM.
-> problems with immediate recall of words presented verbally but not with visual info.
-> Impaired articulatory loop but an intact visual-spatial sketchpad -> evidence of separate stores in the STM.
(+) less emphasis on rehearsal than MSM.
-> Can explain why some things end up in the LTM without rehearsal -> other processes are in play.
(-) Central executive is simplistic and vague.
-> no explanation of what is apart from being involved in attention.
-> Difficult to test central executive.
(-) focus on STM -> doesn’t explain how info is transferred to LTM.
(-) WMM is supported by lab studies which reduces ecological validity -> may not be representative of the real world.