memory- cognitive interviews

Question 1

strength
supporting research (4)

Answer 1

-meta-analysis of findings from 55 studies comparing CI and standard interviews
-CI gave an average 41% increase in accurate info
-4 studies showed no differences between types of interviews
-CI is an effective technique in helping witnesses recall info which is available but inaccessible

Question 2

limitation
some aspects of CI aren’t as useful (3)

Answer 2

-not all aspects of CI are equally effective
-researchers found report everything + reinstate the context produced better recall than any other combination
-reduces credibility of CI

Question 3

limitation
time consuming (3)

Answer 3

-takes time to train officers, carry out the CI- standard interviews are quicker
-takes time to build rapport with witnesses and needs special training which most forces dont have the resources for
-CI isnt a realistic method for police to use- its better to focus on key elements