Memory Flashcards
What research did Baddley conduct?
- He gave 4 different lists of words to 4 groups of participants
- One group had acoustically similar words, another acoustically dissimilar, another semantically similar ad the other one semantically dissimilar
- PPs had to recall their list
What were the findings of Baddley’s research?
- When PPs had to recall immediately (STM), they did worse on the acoustically similar words
- When PPs had to recall after a period of time, they did worse on the semantically similar words
What research did Jacobs conduct?
- He developed a technique for measuring digit span
- This technique was to give an individual ,for example, 4 digits and asked to recall
- This carries on to 5 digits and so on until the person can’t recall the digits correctly
- This number then becomes their digit span
What did Jacobs find?
He found that the mean span for digits was 9.3 and for letters, it was 7.3
What research did Miller conduct?
- Miller’s research was very similar to Jacobs’
- He made observations of everyday life and made note of the fact that everything came in 7s (+/- 2)
- He also noticed that people can remember 5 letters as well as 5 number by chunking
What research did Peterson and Peterson conduct?
- They tested 24 undergraduates
- Each student participated in 8 trials
- In each trial, a student was given a constant syllable (eg YCG) and a 3 digit number
- They were told to count backwards from that number to prevent mental rehearsing
- They were told to stop and recall after either 3 ,6,9,12 or 18 seconds
What did Peterson and Peterson find?
The % of correct responses was highest at 3 seconds and gradually the % decreased when it got to 18 seconds
- This suggests that STM has a very short duration unless repeated
What research did Bahrick conduct?
- Bahrick et al studies 392 participants
- High school yearbooks were obtained for these PPs
- Recall was tested in various ways; photo-recognition and free recall
What did Bahrick find?
- PPs who were tested within 15 years of graduation were about 90% accurate in photo recognition
- PPs who were tested after 48 years were about 70% accurate in photo recognition
- for free recall, after 15 years accuracy was about 60%, after 48 years it was 30%
- showing that LTM lasts a very long time
coding, capacity and duration strengths
(+)Bahrick’s study has high external validity - real life stimuli - not artificial
coding, capacity and duration weaknesses
(-) Baddleys study - artificial stimuli - caution when generalizing
(-) Bahrick’s study might have had confounding variables - some may have been looking over the photos some may not, some may be freinds with them etc
(-) jacob’s study conducted a long time ago
(-)Peterson and Peterson also had artificial stimuli
MSM strengths
(+) large base of research evidence - KF shows that LTM and STM are distinctly different
(+)pioneering model that inspired other more accurate models such as the WMM
MSM weaknesses
(-) KF shows theres more than one STM - he could recall when he read words but if they were read to him he couldn’t recall
(-) MSM too simplified - more than one type of LTM and STM
(-) research that went into the MSM used artificial stimuli - questionable validity
Types of LTM strengths
(+) HM- procedural in tact but his episodic and semantic was damaged
(+)Brain scans evidence - showed diff parts of brain “light up” when diff tasks performed eg semantic -
hippocampus
(+) used to apply to treatments - this research provided basis for treatment of brain damage
Types of LTM weaknesses
(-)