Memory Flashcards
Outline research into Coding
Alan Baddeley (1966a, 1966b). lists of words were given to four different groups, the participants had to memorise these words.
Group 1: Acoustically similar; Can, Cat, Cab
Group 2: Acoustically dissimilar; Pit, Few, Cow
Group 3: Semantically similar; Great, large, big
Group 4: Semantically dissimilar;good, huge, hot
Groups assigned to STM recall tended to do worse with acoustically similar words, groups assigned to LTM recall tended to worse with semantically similar words. This suggests STM is coded acoustically but LTM is coded semantically.
Evaluate Baddeley’s research
Artificial stimuli was used - therefore we cannot generalise as if the information had personal meaning semantic coding may have been used.
Outline research into capacity
Joseph Jacob’s (1887) read a series of digit’s to participants and asked them to recall them. If this was done correctly then he would increase the digits until they could not correctly recall all digits. On average participants could recall 9.3 numbers and 7.3 letters.
George Miller (1956) noticed that many things come in 7’s; 7 notes on the musical scale, 7 days of the week, 7 deadly sins etc. The capacity of STM is 7 items (give or take 2) but can be improved by chunking into meaningful units.
Evaluate research into capacity
Jacobs - research of this time lacked control of extraneous variables and so reduces validity.
Miller - overestimated capacity of STM; other research has found that it is more likely around 4 items
Outline research into STM duration
Peterson and Peterson (1959) gave 24 students a three lettered constant (e.g YCG) and a 3-digit number to remember. They were then asked to count backwards for 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 or 18 seconds; this was the retention interval designed to stop rehearsal. On average recall was about 80% after 3 seconds but only 3% after 18.
Evaluate research into STM duration
Artificial stimuli - we do not normally memorise consonant syllables and so this study lacks external validity. We do however remember phone numbers so it does have some validity.
Outline research into LTM duration
Bahrick et al (1975) Participants were american high school graduates between 17-74. Participants were asked to 1) identify peoples yearbook photos and 2) list all the people in their graduating class.
Participants were 90% accurate in photo recognition after 15 years, and 70% after 48 years. Free recall was 60% accurate after 15 years and 30% accurate after 48 years.
Evaluate research into LTM duration
High external validity as it uses real-life memories research without these memories has been lower. It is weakened however as participants may have looked at years books before the study and so has low confounding variables.
Outline the MSM.
The MSM describes how information flows through the memory system. Memory is made of three stores that are linked by processing. It goes from being detected by stimulus in the environment into the STM where it is maintained through maintenance rehearsal - if this happens enough it then flows into LTM. When memory is retrieved it first has to flow from LTM to STM (if it is stored in LTM) and is then is retrieved from STM (this is called the response).
In the MSM what is the sensory register?
Stimulus from the environment passes through the sensory register (SR). It is 5 different stores - one for each sense. It has very low duration, but very high capacity and coding depends on what sense it is.
How does information transfer from SR to STM?
Very little of what goes into the SR actually progresses to STM. Information only goes to STM if attention is paid to it.
What is the information about STM? (in relation to MSM)
Duration: between 18-30 seconds, unless rehearsed
Capacity between 5-9 items before forgetting occurs.
Coding: acoustic.
In the MSM how is information transferred from STM to LTM?
In STM we have to rehearse information to remember it - if we rehearse it enough it moves into LTM.
What is LTM?
It is a permanent memory store. If we want to recall LTM information it has to be transferred back into STM through retrieval.
Duration: potentially a lifetime
Capacity: Potentially unlimited
Coding: in terms of meaning - semantic.
What are the evaluation points for the MSM?
Baddley’s research shows that STM and LTM are different. We mix up similar sounding words in STM and similar meaning words in LTM - the MSM supports view that STM and LTM are different stores.
Evidence suggests that there are different types of STM. KF could not remember digits read to him, but could rember ones he read. this suggests that there are two stores (such as WMM) but MSM only suggests one.
MSM only suggests one type of rehearsal (maintenance). however some people suggest that elaborative rehearsal (linking to other information/understanding info is needed for LTM.
studies use artificial materials that do not do not represent meaning in real life. thus the studies lack external validity because they show how memory works in a lab - but not in everyday life.
It also oversimplifies LTM - does not reflect different types (semantic, episodic, procedural, etc.) this is a limitation.