MEMORY Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

STM- duration.

A

18-30s
PETERSON + PETERSON.
-24 participants.
-Consonant syllable + 3 digit no.
-Count backwards (stopped at 3, 6, 9, 12 ,15, 18secs)
findings=
-3secs= most accurate.
-18secs= least accurate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

STM- Capacity.

A

JACOBS DIGIT SPAN TEST.
- Pp recalls number/ letter + no. of digits increases each time.
- Mean no. recalled= 7.
MILLER MAGIC NO.7.
- Discovered most things measured in 7.
- Capacity 7 +/- 2 items.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

STM + LTM - Coding.

A

BADDELY.
- Pp’s shown 4 lists of 10 words.=
Acoustically similar + dissimilar.
Semantically similar.
- STM= Acoustically.
- LTM= Semantically.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

LTM - Duration.

A

BAHRICK.
- 392 Americans (17-74 years).
- High school year book.
- Tested recall (photo recognition + free recall).
- PR= more accurate.
DURATION= unlimited / up to a lifetime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

LTM- Capacity.

A

UNLIMITED.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Multi-store model of memory.

A

uygtyfiy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

EVALUATION OF MSM.

A

+ R.S- GLANZER AND CUNITZ.
+ R.S- BADDELY.- Diff memory stores.
- QUALITY OF R.S- Artificial materials.
- RESEARCH REFUTING.- Warrington- KF.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

GLANZER AND CUNITZ.

A

AIM= To test structure + process of STM.
PROCEDURE= Pp showed list of 20 words.
- Recalled words.
FINDINGS= Primacy (remembered words at start) + recency (remembered words at the end) effect.
- Effects explains MSM.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

WORKING MEMORY MODEL.- C.E.

A

CENTRAL EXECUTIVE.
-Supervisory role.
- Co-ordinates 3 subsystems.
- Allocates data to slave systems.
- Limited capacity.
- No storage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

WMM.- VS.S.

A
  • Visual + spatial information.
  • ‘Inner eye’.
  • 3-4 object capacity.
  • Visual cache= storage.
  • Inner scribe= spatial.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

WMM.- E.B.

A
  • Verbal + visual information integrated.
  • Bridge between CE + LTM.
  • Limited capacity (4 chunks).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

WMM.- P.L.

A
  • Auditory + written info.
  • Stores words you can hear.
  • Articulatory process= allows maintenance.
  • Duration= 2 seconds.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

EVALUATION OF WMM.

A

+ R.S- BADDLEY= group 1 (visual+ verbal)
group 2 (visual + visual)- G1= processed quicker.
- QUALITY OF R.S- Researcher bias.
+ R.S FOR SUBSYSTEMS- KF.
- QUALITY OF R.S (KF)- Sample bias- Case study.
- CE= Too vague.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

TYPES OF LTM (Tulving).

A
  • EPISODIC= Memories of events, places + people. (Time stamped+ conscious effort to recall).
  • PROCEDURAL= Motor skill memories. (No conscious effort).
  • SEMANTIC= Memories of facts + knowledge.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

EVALUATION OF LTM.

A

+ R.S- Clive wearing.
- R.S CRITICISED.- Case study.
- R.s LACK CONTROL OF EV.
+ PRACTICAL APPLICATION.- Early intervention.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

EXPLAINATIONS FOR FORGETTING.

A
  1. Interference theory.
  2. Retrieval failure.
17
Q

INTERFERENCE THOERY.

A
  • Forgetting because one memory blocks another, causing distortion/ forgotten memories.
  • Likely to occur when 2 memories stored at different times.
  • 2 TYPES=
    PROACTIVE. (old memory interferes with new).
    RETROACTIVE. (new memory interferes with old).
18
Q

MCGEOCH + MCDONALD.

A
  • Testing retroactive memory.
  • PP learnt list of 10 words until they could 100% recall.
  • Learnt a new list. (Synonyms, antonyms, unrelated adjectives, nonsense syllables, numbers, non-related).
  • Asked to recall original list.
    FINDINGS=
  • Interference strongest when memories are similar.
19
Q

EVALUATION OF INTERFERENCE THEORY.

A

+ R.S- MCGEOCH+ MCDONALD.
- OPPOSING THEORY- RETRIEVAL FAILURE.
- R.S- LAB EXP-LACK EV.

20
Q

RETRIEVAL FAILURE.

A
  • A form of forgetting that occurs when we do not have cues to access memory.
    ENCODING SPECIFICITY PRINCIPLE.
  • Tulving= Cue present at encoding isn’t present during recall.
  • Cue= Triggers memory. 2 TYPES.
21
Q

CONTEXT DEPENDANT CUES.

A
  • Recall depends on external cues e.g. place, weather.
    GODDEN + BADDLEY.
  • Learning + recall of deep sea divers.
  • 4 Conditions.
  • Best recall= Learnt + recall in same place (context dependant cues present).
22
Q

STATE DEPENDENT CUES.

A
  • Recall depends on internal cues e.g. emotional/ physical state (drugs/ drink).
    CARTER + CASSADAY.
  • Learning + recall using antihistamines.
  • 4 Conditions.
  • Best recall= state dependent cues present.
23
Q

EVALUATION OF RETRIEVAL FAILURE.

A

+ R.S - Godden+ Baddeley/ carter + Cassaday.
- QUALITY OF R.S.- Lacks ecological validity.
+ PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS- revision cues.
- Opposing theory- interference.

24
Q

EYE-WITNESS TESTIMONY.

A
  • Ability for someone to accurately recall events they have observed e.g. crime, accident.
25
Q

FACTORS AFFECTING EWT.

A
  • Anxiety.
  • Misleading questions.
26
Q

MISLEADING INFORMATION.

A
  • Incorrect info given to an ew.
  • LEADING QUESTIONS.
  • POST- EVENT DISCUSSIONS.
27
Q

LEADING QUESTIONS.

A
  • A question which suggests a certain answer due to the way it is phrasing.
    LOFTUS + PALMER.
  • 45 participants.
  • Questionnaire.
  • Pp watched a video of car crash from different p.o.v.
  • ‘How fast was the car when they ___?’
    FINDINGS=
  • Crashed= lowest mph.
  • Smashed= highest mph.
  • Questions can distort memory + perception.
28
Q

POST-EVENT DISCUSSION.

A
  • More than one witness discussing events, influencing accuracy of recall.
    GABBERT ET AL.
  • 2 Experimental groups.
  • Watched clips from diff perspective.
  • One group discussed.
    FINDINGS=
  • 71% of pp who discussed recalled event sot seen.
  • 0% inaccurate recall in control group.
  • P.E.D causes inaccuracies in ewt.
29
Q

ANXIETY- J+S.

A

JOHNSON + SCOTT.
- Lab study.
- Pp in waiting room.
- Overheard either: conversation (low a) or argument + smashed glass (high a).
- Man exits holding either: pen with grease or knife with blood.
- Pp shown 50 photos + asked to identify.
- Low anxiety= best recall.
- Weapon focus affect= Ew only focuses on ‘weapon’ + not other objects.

30
Q

ANXIETY DEFINITION.

A
  • State of emotional and physical arousal.
31
Q

ANXIETY- Y+C.

A

Yuille + Cutshall.
- 13/21 witnesses of gun shop shooting interviewed immediately after + 5 months later.
- Questioned on stress levels and any emotional issues.
- Compared reports from both interviews.
- Accuracy determined by no. of details.
- Best recall= high anxiety.

32
Q

EVALUATION OF ANXIETY.

A

+ R.S- Y+C/ J+S.
- Quality of Y+C.- lacks control.
- Quality of J+S.- lab.
- Informed consent.

33
Q

COGNITIVE INTERVIEWS.

A
  • A method of interviewing e.w to help recall accurate memories.
  • Developed by Fisher + Gieselman.
  • Based on psychological principles.
  • Allows memories to be accessed using multiple techniques.
34
Q

COGNITIVE INTERVIEW TECHNIQUES.

A
  1. Report everything.
  2. Reinstate the context.
  3. Reverse the order.
  4. Change perspective.
35
Q

C.I - TECHNIQUE 1.

A

REPORT EVERYTHING.
- Encourage to include every detail including those deemed unnecessary.
- Trivial details may be important and help trigger others.

36
Q

TECHNIQUE 2.

A

REINSTATE THE CONTEXT.
- Mentally return to original crime scene.
- Imagine environment. e.g. weather, visual, emotions.

37
Q

TECHNIQUE 3.

A

REVERSE THE ORDER.
- Recalled in a different chronological order.
- Prevents reporting expectations of what happened.

38
Q

TECHNIQUE 4.

A

CHANGE PERSPECTIVE.
- Recall from diff p.o.v.
- Prevents expectations.
- Schemas could generate false info.