memory Flashcards
(117 cards)
coding definition
format in which information is processed and stored
capacity definition
amount of information that can be help in a memory store
duration definition
length of time information can be held in memory
coding baddeley
- lists of words to four groups of participants
- group 1 – acoustically similar (sound similar)
- group 2 – acoustically dissimilar
- group 3 – semantically similar (similar meaning)
- group 4 - semantically dissimilar
- participants asked to recall words in the same order
coding Baddeley findings
- immediate recall – recalling from short term memory tended to do worse in acoustically similar words
- recall after 20 minutes – recalling from long term memory did worse with semantically similar words
coding baddeley advantage
- separate memory store - identified a clear difference between 2 memory stores, led to multi store memory model
coding baddeley disadvantage
- artificial stimuli - word list had no personal meaning to participants, processing more meaningful information may use semantic coding even for STM tasks.
capacity jacobs
- participants asked to recall the list the correct order until they make an error
- mean score = 9.3
- letter = 7.3
capacity miller
- magic number = 7
- believed that STM capacity is 7 +/- 2
capacity advantage
- valid study - has been replicated (Bobb and Verhaegen)
capacity disadvantage
not so many chunks
- may have overestimated STM capacity
- cowan reviewed research and found capacity of STM is only about 4
- suggests lower end of miller estimate is more appropriate than 7 items
duration Peterson and Peterson
- 24 student participants in 8 trials/tests
- students had to remember a consonant syllable (trigram) and count 3 digit number to count back from
- prevent any mental rehearsal of consonant syllable
- asked to stop for different periods of time from 3-18 seconds
duration Peterson and Peterson findings
- After 3 seconds the average recall was 80%
- After 18 seconds the average recall was 3%
duration Baharick
- 392 american participants aged 17-74
- tested photo recognition and free recall from highschool yearbook
duration Baharick findings
- <15 year graduation 90% photo, 60% free
- 48 years, 70% photo, 30% recall
duration positives
high external validity
- research investigated meaningful memories
- when studies on LTM were conducted with meaningless pictures recall rates lower
- suggests findings reflect a more real estimate of duration of crime
duration negatives
artificial stimuli
- rather than meaning full material
- word list had no personal meaning
- findings may not tell us much ab coding in different kinds of memory tasks
- processing more meaningful information people may use semantic coding even for STM tasks
Factors affecting the accuracy of eyewitness testimony: misleading information
Loftus and Palmer
Loftus and Palmer
- 45 participants to watch clips of car accidents
- asked to describe how fast the cars were going, 5 groups given different verb
- mean for ‘contacted’ was 31.8mph
- mean for ‘smashed’ was 40.5mph
why do leading questions affect EWT
response bias
- wording of questions influence how we answer
- Loftus and palmer - participants who heard ‘smash’ recalled broken glass (there was none)
research on post-event discussion
Gabbert
- each participant watched video of same crime but filmed from different angle
- then discussed what they saw before completing recall test
- 71% recalled aspects that they heard in discussion not in video
- control group where no discussion was 0%
why does post-event discussion affect EWT
- memory contamination - co-witnesses to crime discuss it eyewitness testimony become altered, they combine info with other witnesses with their own
- memory conformity - Gabbert witnesses go along with each other to win social approval
misleading information evaluation
- real world application
- evidence against the substitution
- evidence challenging memory conformity
misleading information real life application
real world application
- in criminal justice system
- Loftus - leading questions have distorting effect on memory so police are careful with how they phrase their questions
- psychologists askd to act as eyewitnesses in court to explain the limits of EWT to juries