memory Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what is multi-store model of memory

A

the multi store model of memory was proposed by Atkinson and Shiffrin and is a structure model. They proposed that memory consisted of three stores: sensory register, short term memory (STM) and a long term memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

the three stages of the MSM

description (AO1)

A

sensory memory is the information you get from your sense, your eyes and ears. When attention is paid to something in the environment it is then converted to short-term memory. Maintenance rehearsal is the process of verbally or mentally repeating information which allows the duration of short-term memory to be extended beyond 30 seconds. This type of rehearsal usually involves repeating information without thinking about its meaning or connecting it to other information. If maintenance rehearsal does not occur, then information is forgotten and lost from short term memory through the processes of displacement or decay. If the information is given meaning (elaborative rehearsal) it is passed on to the LTM. Elaborative rehearsal involves the process of linking new information in a meaningful way with information already stored in long-term memory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

maintenance rehearsal meaning

A

the process of verbally or mentally repeating information which allows the duration of short-term memory to be extended beyond 30 seconds. This type of rehearsal usually involves repeating information without thinking about its meaning or connecting it to other informatin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

elaborative rehearsal meaning

A

involves the process of linking new information in a meaningful way with information already stored in long-term memory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

definition of encoding

A

the way information is changed so that it can be stored in the memory. there are three main ways in which information can be encoded. 1. visual 2. acoustic 3. semantic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

definition of capacity

A

how much information can be stored

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

definition of duration

A

the period of time information can last in the memory stores

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

duration, capacity and encoding

sensory register

A

duration: less than 0.5 seconds
capacity: unlimited
encoding: sense specific

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

duration, capacity and encoding

short term memory

A

duration: between 18-30 seconds
capacity: limited to 5-9 pieces of information
encoding: mainly acoustic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

duration, capacity and encoding of long term memory

A

duration: unlimited
capacity: unlimited
encoding: mainly semantic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

strengths of the MSM (AO3)

A
  • there is a large base of research that supports the idea of distinct STM and LTM systems (eg. brain damaged case study patient KF’s STM was impaired following a motorcycle accident, but his LTM remained intact)
  • it makes sense that memories in the LTM are encoded semantically - ie. you might recall the general message put across in a political speech, rather than all of the words as they were heard.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

weakness of MSM (AO3)

A

the model is arguable over-simplified, as evidence suggests that there are multiple short and long term memory stores, eg. LTM can be split into episodic, procedural and semantic memory

rehearsal is considered a too simple explanation to account for the transfer of information from STM to LTM. For instance, the model ignores factors such as motivation, effect and strategy which underpin learning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

which model is supported by the case study CW

A

memory store model MSM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

which case study supports the memory store model

A

Cleave Wearing CW

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Cleave Wearing case study

A

MEMORY STORE MODEL

In 1985, CW contracted a disease: herpes viral encephalitis which impacted CW’s memory. At that time, CW was a musician. The disease damaged both the left and right temporal lobe and even the frontal lobe. CW’s hippocampus was completely eradicated by the disease. This gave him anterograde amnesia, which refers to the inability to make or keep memories. However, CW also has retrograde amnesia, which refers to losing previous memories as well.

Following the virus, CW could not keep information in short-term memory for longer than 30 seconds; however he was able to recall information from his past, for example his wife’s name. CW was unable to transfer information from his STM to his LTM, but was able to retrieve information successfully. CW’s case supports the idea that memories are formed by passing information from one store to the next in a linear fashion and that damage to any part of the MSM can cause memory impairment.

The strengths of his case study is that is shows that long term memory encodes semantically as he remembers his wife and remembers how to play the piano.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

MSM research

what did Baddeley do

A

coding of STM and LTM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

MSM research

Baddeley - coding of STM and LTM (AO1)

A

Baddeley (1966) gave participants one of four word lists to learn. The lists contained words that were either acoustically similar (sounded the same, e.g. hat, cat, bat); acoustically dissimilar (sounded different, e.g. hat, stage, ball); semantically similar (had the same meaning, e.g. big, large); or semantically dissimilar (had different meanings, e.g. gate, big). Participants either recalled the list immediately, testing the coding of short-term memory (STM) or after 20 minutes, testing the coding of long-term memory (LTM). Participants did worse with acoustically similar words in STM, suggesting that information in STM is coded according to sound, as similar-sounding information conflicted with each other. For LTM, they did worse with semantically similar words, suggesting that information in LTM is coded according to meaning, as information with similar meanings conflicted with each other.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

MSM research

strength of Baddeley experiment (AO3)

A

reliable - it has standardised procedures that can be easily replicated. Baddeley improved the reliability of his own study by getting rid of the read-aloud word lists (some participants had hearing difficulties) and replacing them with slides. Everyone saw the same word for the same amount of time (3 seconds).

mundane realism - has beneficial implications for real-life scenarios; for instance, students can use these findings to strategies their revision techniques better

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

MSM research

weakness of Baddeley experiment (AO3)

A

cross-cultural differences - it was carried out on British students, which makes it ethnocentric. Therefore the research does not consider cross-cultural differences and limits the generalisability of the findings.

small sample - the sample included 72 participants, which is not representative of the population and limits the generalisability of the findings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

MSM research

who did coding of STM and LTM

A

Baddeley

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

what did Miller do

A

capacity of short term memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

MSM research

Miller - capacity of short term memory (AO1)

A

Miller presented participants with a sequence of numbers. He added one number to each sequence each time they were able to recall the sequence.
The capacity of the STM is found when they can no longer accurately recall the sequence. When using chunking, Miler found that the participants were able to recall 5-9 items. This is a strength of the multi-store model because this supports the claim that the STM has a limited capacity of 5-9 items. Therefore this increases the credibility capacity of the STM in the MSM, making the MSM an increasingly valid model of memory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

MSM research

strength of Miller experiment (AO3)

A

supported by psychological research - For example,Jacobs (1887) conducted an experiment using a digit span test, to examine the capacity of short-term memory for numbers and letters. Jacobs used a sample of 443 female students (aged from 5-16) from the North London Collegiate School. Participants had to repeat back a string of numbers or letters in the same order and the number of digits/letters was gradually increased, until the participants could no longer recall the sequence. Jacobs found that the student had an average span of 7.3 letters and 9.3 words, which supports Miller’s notion of 7+/-2.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

MSM research

weakness of Miller experiment

A

miller didn’t take into account other factors that affect capacity - Jacobs conducted research with children between 5 and 16. He found that the capacity of the STM in children, 5 and under was shorter than the capacity of children who are 16 and older. This is a limitation of Miller’s findings because Jacob’s study shows that there may be other factors such as age, which affects the capacity of the STM. This reduces the validity of Miller’s findings, because the STM has a capacity that may not be as limited as Miller thought. This makes the MSM reductionist because other factors such as age weren’t considered.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

MSM research

who found out about the capacity of short term memory

A

Miller

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

MSM research

what did Peterson and Peterson’s do

A

duration of STM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

MSM research

Peterson and Peterson - duration of STM

A

Peterson & Peterson (1959)investigated theduration of short-term memoryby conducting a laboratory experiment with a sample of 24 psychology students.

The students had to recall meaningless three-letter trigrams (for example, THG, XWV) at different intervals (3, 6, 9, 12, 15 or 18 seconds). To prevent rehearsal (practice) the students had to count backwards in threes or fours from a specific number, until they were asked to recall the letters.

Peterson & Peterson found that the longer the interval the less accurate the recall. At 3 seconds, around 80% of the trigrams were correctly recalled, whereas at 18 seconds only 10% were correctly recalled.

Peterson & Peterson concluded that short-term memory has a limited duration of approximately 18 seconds. Furthermore, the results show that if we are unable to rehearse information, it will not be passed to long-term memory, providing further support for the multi-store model and the idea of discrete components.

Peterson and Peterson carried out an experiment to determine the duration of the STM.
They used the 24 male and female used psychology students. The researcher presented a 3 constant sequence. Immediately after, a 3 digit number was read out to them. The participants were asked to count backwards from the number as an interference task, to prevent rehearsal of the trigram within the STM. A red light was presented at intervals between 3 and 18 seconds. When the red light went off, they had to recall the trigram. Peterson et al found that at 3 seconds, the average recall was 80%, whereas at 18 seconds, the average recall was 10%. This supports the claim that the STM has limited duration of 18 seconds. The participants were asked to count back from the number, which interfered with the ability to rehearse the trigram. The trigram may have also been displaced from the STM due to the addition of new information. This increases the validity of the findings regarding the duration of STM in the MSM model for memory, making it more credible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

MSM research

strength of Peterson and Peterson experiment (AO3)

A

good control - it uses standardised procedures to make sure all participants experienced the same process. This means that the study is scientific because it can be replicated and the reliability of the findings can be checked to make sure they were not a one-off result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

MSM research

weakness of Peterson and Peterson’s experiment (AO3)

A

In this study participants were asked to recall three letter trigrams, which is unlike anything people would want to memorise in their everyday lives. As a result we are unable to apply these results to everyday examples of memory and are unable to conclude if the duration of short-term memory may be longer for more important information i.e. memorising a phone number.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

MSM research

who did duration of STM

A

Peterson and Peterson’s

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

MSM research

Peterson and Peterson’s experiment (AO3)

A

good control - it uses standardised procedures to make sure all participants experienced the same process. This means that the study is scientific because it can be replicated and the reliability of the findings can be checked to make sure they were not a one-off result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

MSM research

weakness of Peterson and Peterson’s experiment (AO3)

A

low levels of ecological validity - In this study participants were asked to recall three letter trigrams, which is unlike anything people would want to memorise in their everyday lives. As a result we are unable to apply these results to everyday examples of memory and are unable to conclude if the duration of short-term memory may be longer for more important information i.e. memorising a phone number.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

what is the working memory model (AO1)

A

the working memory model proposed by Baddeley and Hitch in 1947, replaced the idea of a unitary STM. It suggests a system involving active processing and short-term storage of information.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

who made the working memory model

A

Baddley and Hitch

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

key features of the working memory model

A

central executive
phonological loop
visuospatial sketchpad
episodic buffer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

what is the central executive (AO1)

A

the central executive has a supervisory function. It acts as a filter and a control centre. It decides where the information goes and what information to pay attention to. It can process information in all sensory forms and directs information to the phonological loop and visuospatial sketchpad and collects responses. It has a limited capacity and deals with only one piece of information at a time.

Early in Baddeley’s analysis of working memory, he suggested that the central executive system carried out five important executive component to process:
1. capacity to focus attention
2. capacity to divide attention between two concurrent tasks
3. capacity to switch attention from one task to another
4. inhibition is the ability to hold back a predominant, automatic, or previously learned response that may be inappropriate or irrelevant in the present context
5. planning and decision making as it allows us to actively keep track of all of the necessary information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

what is the articulatory-phonological loop (AO1)

A

this temporarily retains language based information. it stores a limited number of speech based sounds for a brief period. it holds information in a speech-based form for 1-2 seconds. written words must first be converted in an articulatory code before they can enter the phonological loop

the two subcomponents are:
an articulatory rehearsal process = (inner voice) allows sub-vocal repetition of the items stored in the phonological store

the phonological store = (inner voice) allows acoustically coded items to be stored for a brief period

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

what are the two sub component of articulatory phonological loop (AO1)

A

articulatory rehearsal process
phonological store

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

what is the visuospatial sketchpad (AO1)

A

stores visual and spatial information and be thought of as an inner eye. It is responsible for setting and manipulating mental images. It has limited capacity but the limits of the two systems are independent.

Visual information refers to what things look like. It is likely that the visuospatial sketchpad plays an important role in helping us keep track of where we are in relation to other objects as we move through our environment. For example, being aware of where we are in relation to desks, chairs and tables when we are walking around a classroom means that we don’t bump into things.

The sketchpad also displays and manipulates visual and spatial information held in long-term memory.

  • inner scribe = retains information about movement sequences and is closely linked to the planning and execution of movement
  • visual cache = holds information about form and colour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

what are the two subcomponents of visuospatial sketchpad

A

inner scribe
visual cache

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

what is the episodic buffer (AO1)

A

in 2000 Baddeley proposed the additional component. it is responsible for integrating and manipulating material. it has limited capacity and depends heavily on executive processing. it binds information together from different sources into chunks or episodes. it is able to recall material from LTM and integrate it into STM when working memory requires it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

key study by Baddley and Hitch
(aim, method, results and conclusion) (AO1)

A

aim: to investigate if participants can use different parts of working memory at the same time

method: conducted an experiment in which participants were asked to perform two tasks at the same time (dual task technique) - a digit span task which required them to repeat a list of numbers, and a verbal reasoning task which required them to answer true or false to various questions.

results: as the number of digits increased in the digit span tasks, participants took longer to answer the reasoning question, but not much longer - only fractions of a second. And, they didn’t make any more errors in the verbal reasoning tasks as the number of digits increased.

conclusion: the verbal reasoning task made use of the central executive and the digit span made use of the phonological loop.

43
Q

who did the key study of WMM

A

Baddley and Hitch

44
Q

KF case study

A

WORKING MEMORY MODEL

KF suffered a motorcycle accident and damaged several areas of his brain. After the accident his short-term memory for digits was very poor when they were read aloud to him. However, when he was able to read the digits himself, his recall was much better. This shows that he could not process auditory information but could process visual information. This supports the WMM as it shows that there are separate stores for processing these different types of information. Consequently, Patient KF undermines the Multi-Store Model of Memory suggesting that STM is not unitary component.

Therefore, an individua case study can highlight flaws within a theory and significantly undermine other research

45
Q

HM case study

A

WORKING MEMORY MODEL

In an attempt to control his seizures, HM underwent brain surgery to remove his hippocampus and amygdala. As a result of his surgery, HM’s seizures decreased, but he could no longer form new memories or remember the prior 11 years of his life. He lost his ability to form many times of new memories such as new facts or faces, and the surgery also caused retrograde amnesia as he was able to recall childhood events, but lost the ability to recall experiences a few years before his surgery.

The strengths of this case study is that it supports the WMM as it supports the idea that STM has a separate store from LTM. It also supports the fact that LTM has an unlimited capacity and the idea to form LTM, they need to come from STM.

Furthermore, HM could still learn new skills (store them and retrieve them) meaning that LTM might have 2 stores. This contradicts the MSM; that LTM has only one unit.

46
Q

what case study supports the WMM

A

KF and HM

47
Q

what model does KF case study support

A

working memory model

48
Q

what model does HM case study support

A

working memory model

49
Q

outline and evaluate the working memory model (16 mark)

A

AO1:
- what the working memory model is
- central executive, articulatory phonological loop, visuospatial scratchpad, episodic buffer
- key study by Baddley and Hitch

AO3:
- strength - KF case study, reliable
- weakness - too simplistic, low ecological validity

50
Q

different types of long term memory

what is long term memory briefly

A

long term memory is the final stage of the multi-store memory model proposed by Atkinson-Shiffrin, providing the lasting retention of information and skills

51
Q

components of the long term memory

A

episodic memory, semantic memory, procedural memory

52
Q

episodic memory (AO1)

A

part of the explicit long-term memory and is responsible for storing information about events that we have experienced in our lives. It involves conscious thought and is declarative. An example would be a memory of out 1st day at school. It is associated with the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. The strength of the episodic memory is that it is determined by the strength of the emotions experienced when they are coded.

53
Q

semantic memory (AO1)

A

part of the long-term memory responsible for storing information about the world. This includes knowledge about the meaning of words, as well as general knowledge. For example, London is the capital of England. It involves conscious thought and is declarative. It is also the memory of relationships and how things fit together. It includes the memory that you have a brother or sister, as well as where things are located and what they do. It is associated with the temporal lobe. The strength of the semantic memory is that it depends on the emotion experienced when the memory is coded. Can be expressed verbally

54
Q

procedural memory (AO1)

A

part of the implicit long-term memory and is responsible for how to do things such as tying shoelaces. It does not include conscious thought and is not declarative. It is acquired through repetition and practice. It is associated with cerebellum and motor cortex. Difficult to express in words.

55
Q

strength of the different types of long term memory (AO3)

A

support from case studies - Examples include the case studies of HM and Clive Wearing; they showed difficulty recalling events that had happened in their past (episodic memories) but their sematic memories were unaffected. HM couldn’t recall stroking a dog but understood the meaning of ‘dog’. Their procedural memories were also intact which supports the view that they are different types of LTM AS one can be damaged and the other can be intact.

brain scans show that there are different types of LTM stores -Tulving et al. asked participants to perform a memory task whilst their brains were being scanned with a PET scan. It was found that episodic memories were located in the right prefrontal cortex and semantic memories in the left. This conveys the physical reality of the separate stores in the brain and other research has confirmed this, increasing its validity.

real life application - Belleville et al. found that episodic memories can be improved in older people with cognitive impairments. Psychologist scan target certain kinds of memories in order to improve people’s lives. This highlights a benefit in distinguishing between types of LTM as it can lead to the development of outstanding treatments.
A limitation is there may only be two types of LTM. Cohen and Squire argued that semantic and episodic memories are stored in one LTM store called declarative memory (that can be consciously recalled). Like Tulving, they still agreed that procedural memory was distinct and called it non-declarative memory. It is important to get the distinctions between these memories right as it influences memory studies and has a knock on effect on how we use it.

56
Q

forgetting in long term memory

definition of the interference theory (AO1)

A

the interference theory believes that forgetting occurs because memories interfere with and disrupt one another. In 1999, Baddeley stated that forgetting occurs because of interference with other memories.

57
Q

forgetting in long term memory

what are the two types of interference which can cause forgetting (AO1)

just the two types

A

proactive interference (pro forward)
retroactive interference (retro backward)

58
Q

forgetting in long term memory

the two types of interference which can cause forgetting (AO1)

+ description

A

proactive interference occurs when you cannot learn a new task because of an old task that had been learnt. When what we already knows interferes with what we are currently learning where old memories disrupt new memories.

Keppel and underwood (1962) demonstrated proactive interference. Participants were tasked with recalling constant trigrams after varying intervals when they were tasked with counting backwards in threes. Forgetting increased after each interval however little forgetting occurred at the start. Proactive interference can explain this as earlier consonants entered the long term memory and thus interfered with the formation of new memories

retroactive interference (retro=backward) occurs when you forget a previously learnt task due to the learning of a new task. In other words, later learning interferes with earlier learning - where new memories disrupt old memories

Muller (1900) identified retroactive interference through a study where participants tasked with learning a list of syllables are given an intervening task between exposure to the syllables and recall. The intervening task (describing paintings) produced retroactive interference with participants struggling to recall the lists

59
Q

is proactive interference pro forward or retro backward

A

pro forward

60
Q

is proactive interference pro forward or retro backward

A

retro backward

61
Q

who did research on proactive interference

A

Keppel and underwood

62
Q

who did research on retroactive interference

A

Muller

63
Q

forgetting in long term memory

interference theory - what is proactive interference

A

proactive interference occurs when you cannot learn a new task because of an old task that had been learnt. When what we already know interferes with what we are currently learning - where old memories disrupt new memories

Keppel and underwood (1962) demonstrated proactive interference. Participants were tasked with recalling constant trigrams after varying intervals when they were tasked with counting backwards in threes. Forgetting increased after each interval however little forgetting occurred at the start. Proactive interference can explain this as earlier consonants entered the long term memory and thus interfered with the formation of new memories

64
Q

forgetting in long term memory

interference theory - what is retroactive interference

A

retroactive interference occurs when you forget a previously learnt task due to the learning of a new task. In other words, later learning interferes with earlier learning - where new memories disrupt old memories

Muller (1900) identified retroactive interference through a study where participants tasked with learning a list of syllables are given an intervening task between exposure to the syllables and recall. The intervening task (describing paintings) produced retroactive interference with participants struggling to recall the lists

65
Q

interference theory experiment (AO1)

aim, method, results and conclusion

A

AO1: interference theory experiment

aim: to investigate how retroactive interference affects learning. In other words, to investigate whether information you have recently received interferes with the ability to recall something, you learned earlier

method: a lab experiment was used. Participants were split into two groups. Both groups had to remember a list of paired words eg. cat-tree, jelly-moss. The experimental group also had to learn another list of words where the second paired word is different eg. cat-grass, jelly-time. The control group were not given the second list. All participants were asked to recall the words on the first list.

results: the recall of the control group was more accurate than that of the experimental group.

conclusion: this suggests that learning items in the second list interfered with participants’ ability to recall the list. This is an example of retroactive interference

66
Q

forgetting in LTM

evaluation
strength of interference theory (AO3)

A

lack ecological validity and mundane realism - one major weakness with interference theory is the interference effects are more evident in laboratory-based settings using various memory-based tasks. These setups lack ecological validity and also mundane realism as these tasks are rarely indicative of what people would experience in real-life situations. Therefore it makes it difficult to generalise the findings externally beyond the laboratory settings or understand how much day-to-day forgetting can be credited to interference or even forgetting in general.

interference isn’t the only explanation for forgetting - another explanation for forgetting is retrieval failure. This is where information is available, but we are unable to access it. This happens when you have insufficient cues. A study by Godden and Baddeley investigated the effects of contextual cues on recall. Some participants had to learn lists of words on land and recall on land. They found that the higher recalls were in the place that the words were learnt and recall in the same environment. This shows that cues present in the environment where information was learnt, need to be present when you recall the information. Therefore, this suggests that there may be several explanations for forgetting in LTM.

67
Q

forgetting in LTM
evaluation

weakness of interference theory (AO3)

A

Baddeley and Hitch - However, Baddeley and Hitch carried out a field experiment to test retroactive interference. They asked rugby union players who had played every match in the season and players who had missed some gams due to injury. The length of the time from the beginning of the season to the end of the season was the same for all players, and players were asked to recall the names of the teams they had played against earlier in the season. They found that the players who had played the most games forgot proportionally more games than those who had played fewer games due to injury.

68
Q

forgetting in LTM

what is retrieval failure

just definition

A

retrieval failure = where the information is in long term memory, but cannot be accessed. Such information is said to be available but not accessible. It cannot be accessed because the retrieval cues are not present.

Encoding Specificity Principle (ESP). This principle states the memory is most effective when information that was present at the time of coding is also present at the time of retrieval.

Contextual cues: They refer to elements in the environment that act as cues when we are learning. For example, the room where you are learning information.

State cues: They refer to psychological or mental elements that act as cues when we are learning. For example, your mood at the moment you are learning.

There are two types of retrieval failure due to the absence of cues:
1. context dependent failure
2. state dependent failure

69
Q

contextual cues definition

A

they refer to elements in the environment that act as cues when we are learning. for example, the room where you are learning information

70
Q

state cues definition

A

they refer to psychological or mental elements that act as cues when we are learning. For example, your mood at the moment when you are learning

71
Q

what are the two types of retrieval failure due to the absence of cues

(just the two types)

A

context dependent failure
state dependent failure

72
Q

forgetting in LTM

retrieval failure
context dependent memory (AO1)

A

context-dependent memory refers to improved recall of specific episodes or information when contextual cues relating to the environment are the same during encoding and retrieval.

Godden and Baddeley (1975)

An experiment conducted by Godden and Baddeley indicates the importance of setting for retrieval. Baddeley asked 18 deep-sea divers to memorize a list of 36 unrelated words of two or three syllables.

There were 4 groups in total. Group 1 (experimental group on land) learned the words on land and recalled on land. Group 2 (control group on land ) learned the words on land and recalled underwater. Group 3 (experimental group underwater) learned the words underwater and recalled underwater. Group 4 (control group underwater) learned underwater and recalled on land.

They found that those who had recalled in the same environment, recalled 60% more words than those recalling in a different environment. This suggests that the retrieval of information is improved if it occurs in the context in which it was learned.

Therefore, forgetting is due to lack of contextual cues when we are trying to retrieve information that was learnt in a different environment. This gives credibility to the retrieval failure theory.

Therefore, environmental cues improve the recall.

73
Q

forgetting in LTM

retrieval failure
context dependent memory definition

A

context-dependent memory refers to improved recall of specific episodes or information when contextual cues relating to the environment are the same during encoding and retrieval.

74
Q

forgetting in LTM

retrieval failure
context dependent memory (AO1)

A

context-dependent memory refers to improved recall of specific episodes or information when contextual cues relating to the environment are the same during encoding and retrieval.

Godden and Baddeley (1975)

An experiment conducted by Godden and Baddeley indicates the importance of setting for retrieval. Baddeley asked 18 deep-sea divers to memorize a list of 36 unrelated words of two or three syllables.

There were 4 groups in total. Group 1 (experimental group on land) learned the words on land and recalled on land. Group 2 (control group on land ) learned the words on land and recalled underwater. Group 3 (experimental group underwater) learned the words underwater and recalled underwater. Group 4 (control group underwater) learned underwater and recalled on land.

They found that those who had recalled in the same environment, recalled 60% more words than those recalling in a different environment. This suggests that the retrieval of information is improved if it occurs in the context in which it was learned.

Therefore, forgetting is due to lack of contextual cues when we are trying to retrieve information that was learnt in a different environment. This gives credibility to the retrieval failure theory.

Therefore, environmental cues improve the recall.

75
Q

forgetting in LTM

retrieval failure
context dependent memory

weakness of Godden and Baddeley (AO3)

A

Baddeley did not control many variables - the divers took part in the experiment at different times of the day and at different diving locations. This suggests that each diver would have experienced other contextual cues, which may have affected their memory. Therefore, we are unable to conclude whether the results of Godden and Baddeley’s research are because of the on land/underwater contextual cues, or another contextual cue provided by the different time of day or driving location. This decreases the validity of the claim that learning and retrieval have to be in the same place to reduce forgetting.

Baddeley and Godden used a repeated measure design - this means that each diver took part in each condition. It is possible that the divers worked out the aim of the experiment and displayed demand characteristics or order effects as they saw the same words several times over 4 days. By the fourth trial, the participants may have demonstrated practice effects where the recall improved as a result of completing the experiment multiple times, or fatigue effects where their results declined because of boredom. This reduces the validity of the findings regarding contextual cues and how they reduce forgetting.

76
Q

forgetting in LTM

retrieval failure
state dependent memory definition

A

state dependent memory refers to improved recall of specific episodes or information when cues relating to emotional and physical state are the same during encoding and retrieval.

77
Q

forgetting in LTM

retrieval failure
state dependent memory (AO1)

A

state dependent memory refers to improved recall of specific episodes or information when cues relating to emotional and physical state are the same during encoding and retrieval.

AO1: Goodwin et al. state dependent experiment

There is research support for the effect of state-dependent retrieval failure. A study by Goodwin et al. investigated the effect of alcohol on state-dependent retrieval. They asked male volunteers to remember list of words when they were either drunk or sober. The participants were then asked to recall the words 24 hours later, in either a drunk of sober state. The results showed that the recall was better when they were in the same mental state when they learned the words and when they recalled them. This supports the state-dependent memory theory as the performance was best in the participants who were sober or intoxicated on both days.

78
Q

forgetting in LTM

retrieval failure
strength of state dependent memory (AO3)

A

there is considerable evidence to support this theory of forgetting from evidence from outside the laboratory. For example, many people say they can’t remember much about their childhood or their school days. But returning to the house in which they spent their childhood or attending a school reunion often provides retrieval cues which trigger a flood of memories. Therefore, state and context dependent cues may be affecting retrieval of real memories after all, increasing the ecological validity of the theory.

79
Q

eye witness testimony

definition of eye witness testimony

A

EWT is the evidence given in court or a police investigation by someone who has witnessed a crime or accident

80
Q

what are the two factors of EWT

A

misleading information and anxiety

81
Q

EWT

misleading information (AO1)

A

misleading information: incorrect information given to an eyewitness usually after the event. it can take many forms, such as leading questions and post-event discussing between co-witness or other people

  • leading questions: a question which because of the way it is phrased, suggests a certain answer. for example, “was the knife in his left hand?”. Leads a person to think that’s where the knife was. response bias - does not change your memory. influences the way you answer. substitution - the wording of a leading question changes the participant’s memory.
  • post-event discussion: occurs when there is more than one witness to an event. Witnesses may discuss what they have seen with co-witness or with other people. This may influence the accuracy of each witness’s recall of the event. memory contamination - when witnesses combine their own memories of the incident with information from other people. our actual memory of the incident is changed. memory conformity - our actual memory is unchanged. this happens when the witness seeks social approval (NSI) or when they believe the others are right (ISI)
82
Q

outline and evaluate forgetting 16 marker

A

AO1:
interference theory - proactive interference, retroactive interference
interference theory experiment

AO3:
evaluation of interference theory experiment

AO1:
retrieval failure - context dependent memory, state dependent memory
Godden and Baddeley experiment

AO3:
evaluation of Godden and Baddeley

83
Q

EWT

what are the two subcomponents of misleading information

A

leading question
post event discussion

84
Q

EWT

anxiety (AO1)

A

anxiety: has a strong emotional and physical effects. anxiety creates physiological arousal in the body which prevents us paying attention to important cues, so recall is worse.

  • weapon focus: an eyewitness’s concentration on a weapon to the exclusion of other details of crime.
85
Q

EWT

what is subcomponent of anxiety

A

weapon focus

86
Q

EWT

misleading information - leading question
experiment (AO1)

A

Loftus and Palmer conducted a classic experiment to investigate the effect of leading questions on the accuracy of eyewitness testimony. 45 American students formed an opportunity sample. They were divided into five groups of nine. This was a laboratory experiment with five conditions, only one of which was experienced by each participant. Participants were shown slides of a car accident involving a number of cars and asked to describe what had happened as if they were eyewitnesses. They were then asked specific questions, including questions “About how fast were the cars going when they (hit/ smashed/ collided/ bumped/ contacted) each other”. The findings show that the speed was affected by the verb used in the question. The verb implied information about speed, which systematically affected the participant’s memory of the accident. For example, participants who were given the verb ‘smashed’ reported an average speed of 40.5 mph, where participants who were given the word ‘contacted’ reported an average speed of 31.8 mph, an overall difference of 8.7 mph. The results clearly show that the accuracy of eyewitness testimony is affected by leading questions and that a single word in a question can significantly affect the accuracy of our judgements. The IV was the wording of the question and the DV was the speed reported by the participants.

In a second experiment, Loftus and Palmer used a different sample of 150 American students, who were divided into three even groups. All the students watch a one-minute video depicting a car accident and were then given a questionnaire to complete.

One group was asked “How fast were the cars going when they smashed into each other?”.

Another group was asked “How fast were the cards going when they hit each other?”

The final group was not asked about the speed of vehicles.

One week later the participants returned and were asked a series of questions about the accident. The critical question was: “Did you see any broken glass?” 32% of the participants who were previously questioned using the verb ‘smashed’, reported seeing broken glass; 14% of the participants who were previously questioned using the verb ‘hit’, reported seeing broken glass; and 12% of the control group reported seeing broken glass.

There was no broken glass in the video clip and the participants who were questioned previously using the verb ‘smashed’ were significantly more likely to report seeing the broken glass, as a result of the earlier leading question. This is the because the verb ‘smashed’ has connotations of faster speed and broken glass and this question led the participants to report seeing something that was not actually present. Their memory for the original event was distorted by the question used on week earlier, demonstrating the power of leading questions.

87
Q

EWT

strength of misleading information - leading question
experiment (AO3)

A

highly controlled - Loftus and Palmer’s research took place in a laboratory of Washington University and was therefore highly controlled. The high degree of control reduces the chance of extraneous variable, increasing the validity of results. Furthermore, it is easy for psychologists to replicate their research, to see if the same results are achieved with a different population

88
Q

EWT

weakness of misleading information - leading question
experiment (AO3)

A

low ecological validity - Although questioning participants about everyday events like a car crash may appear to be a genuine measure of eyewitness testimony. The participants in the research watched a video of a car crash and witnessed the events unfold from start to finish. In everyday reports of a car accidents, witnesses rarely see the whole event; they are either involved in the event directly, or see a small part of the event happen in their peripheral vision. Therefore, their results do not reflect everyday car accidents. The knowledge that the participants have got from watching the video may have affected how they created memories.

lacks population validity - Their two experiments consisted of 45 and 150 Americans. It is reasonable to argue that the students in their experiments were less experienced drivers, who may be less accurate at estimating speeds. Consequently, we are unable to generalise the results to other populations, for example, older and more experienced drivers, may be more accurate in their judgement of speeds and therefore not as susceptible to leading questions.

89
Q

who investigated on misleading information leading questions

A

Loftus and Palmer

90
Q

EWT

anxiety - weapon focus
experiment (AO1)

A

Loftus (1979) reported the findings of Johnson and Scott (1976) who conducted an experiment to see if anxiety affects the accuracy of eyewitness testimony and facial recognition.

Johnson and Scott invited participants to a laboratory where they were told to wait in the reception area. A receptionist who was seated nearby excused herself to run an errand, leaving the participant alone. The experimenter used an independent groups design, as participants were then exposed to one of two conditions:

1) in the no-weapon condition, participants overhead a conversation in the laboratory about equipment failure. Thereafter an individual (the target) left the laboratory and walked passed the participant holding a pen, with his hands covered in grease

2) in the weapon condition, participants overheard a heated exchange and the sound of breaking glass and crashing chairs. This was followed by an individual (the target) running into the reception area, holding a bloodied letter opener.

Both groups were then shown 50 photographs and asked to identify the person who had left the laboratory. The participants were informed that the suspect may, or may not be present in the photographs.

Those who had witnessed the man holding a pen correctly identified the target 49% of the time, compared to those who had witness the man holding a knife, who correctly identified the target 33% of the time. Loftus claimed that the participants who were exposed to the knife had higher levels of anxiety and were more likely to focus their attention on the weapon and not the face of the target, a phenomenon known as the weapon focus effect. Therefore, the anxiety associated with seeing a knife reduces the accuracy of eyewitness testimony.

91
Q

EWT

weakness of anxiety - weapon focus
experiment (AO3)

A

lacks ecological validity - Although the participants were waiting in the reception area outside the laboratory, they may have anticipate that something was going to happen, which could have affected the accuracy of their judgements. Furthermore, the results from real life case studies refute the findings of Loftus and suggest that her results do not represent real-life cases of extreme anxiety

numerous ethical guidelines were broken - the participants were deceived about the nature of the experiment and not protection from harm. Loftus exposed some of the participants to a man holding a bloodied knife, which could have caused extreme feelings of anxiety. This is an issue as these participants may have left the experiment feeling exceptionally stressed and anxious, especially if they, or someone they knew, had been involved in in knife crime

92
Q

cognitive interview - eye witness testimony
definition
AO1

A

The cognitive interview is a questioning technique used by the police to enhance the retrieval of information about a crime scene from the eyewitness’s and victim’s memory. Geiselman et al developed the cognitive interview as an alternative to the standard interview. It takes into account psychological findings about cue-dependent forgetting and has four stages designed to stimulate as many cues as possible in order to maximize different retrieval routes.

93
Q

4 steps of cognitive interview (eyewitness testimony)
AO1

A

stage 1: reinstate the context
stage 2: recall events in reverse order
stage 3: report everything they can remember
stage 4: describe events from someone else’s point of view

94
Q

cognitive interview (eyewitness testimony)

context reinstatement (CR) meaning

A

the interview tries to mentally reinstate the environmental and personal context of the crime for the witness, perhaps by asking them about their general activities and feelings on the day eg. sights, sounds, feelings

95
Q

cognitive interview (eyewitness testimony)

report everything (RE) meaning

A

encouraging them to report every detail, no matter how small, can increase witness accuracy

96
Q

cognitive interview (eyewitness testimony)

change of perspective (CP) definition

A

when a person considers the event from someone else’s point of view. For example, they might consider what the offender saw. This also lessens the influence of schema

97
Q

cognitive interview (eyewitness testimony)

recall in reverse order (RO)

A

when a person recalls the events in reverse chronological order. this prevents to form schemas

98
Q

what is Giseleman et al’s 4 princicples of cognitive interview

A

context reinstatement, report everything, change of perspective, recall in reverse order

99
Q

cognitive interview (eyewitness testimony)

Giseleman et al study (AO1)

A

The study aimed to test the effectiveness of the cognitive interview technique in the memory recall of eyewitness. The researchers wanted to compare the efficiency of this technique to the standard interview and the hypnosis interview techniques.

Eighty-nine participants were shown a view of a violent crime. Around 48 hours later, a law enforcement professional used one of three different methods to interview the participants. These were:

  • the cognitive interview technique
  • the standard interview technique
  • the hypnosis interview technique

the interviewers noted the number of facts recalled accurately, the number of inaccuracies and the number of made up details by the participants.

Results showed that there was significantly more accurate memory recall from eyewitnesses with the cognitive interview and hypnosis interview. The standard technique produced the lowest number of accurately recalled facts.

100
Q

strength of cognitive interview (AO3)

A

Fisher et al - studied a field experiment to test the effectiveness of the cognitive interview technique. 16 police detectives took part in a study. Detectives were first asked to record some interviews using their standard interview techniques. After, seven police detectives were trained to use cognitive interview technique and nine used the standard police interview technique. The results showed that the detectives who used the cognitive interview technique gained 63% more information than those who did not use the technique. The study showed strong support for using the cognitive interview technique in the practical field. There was also no loss of accuracy of information along with increased information obtained.

more structured - the technique is more structured than the standard technique, and it seems appropriate for crime-related interviews to be very thorough in order to gather the detail required for a useful testimony

101
Q

weakness of cognitive interview (AO3)

A

Koenhnken et al - Koehnken et al found that witnesses recalled more incorrect information when interviewed with the cognitive interview compared to the standard interview technique, perhaps because more detailed recall increases the chances of making mistakes.

the interview is far more time consuming than the standard interview

102
Q

outline and evaluate cognitive interview (16 mark)

A

AO1:
- what cognitive interview is
- stages of cognitive interview
- 4 principles of cognitive interview
- Giselman et al study

AO3:
strength
- Fisher et al, more structured

weakness
- Koenhnken et al

103
Q

outline and evaluate cognitive interview

A
104
Q

enhanced cognitive interview

A

in the early 1990s, researchers added to the cognitive interview, creating the enhanced cognitive interview (ECI). The ECI maintains the same principles as the cognitive interview technique; however, the ECI also examines how other social factors affect report accuracy.

A study found that witnesses’ attitudes and motivations towards the interview affect the quality of their reporting. This includes how the witness perceives the appropriateness of the interview procedure.

It was found that the higher the perception of the interview appropriateness, the more detailed their reports and the better their attitude was towards being interviewed.