Media and models of persuation Flashcards
Psychologists see attitudes in three components…
- Affective: feelings about the attitude object
- Behavioural: tendency to act in a certain way in relation to the attitude object
- Cognitive: beliefs and thoughts about the attitude object
Hovland-Yale model
This model described the factors which affect how persuasive a message is, the process by which persuasion occurs and the outcomes: FACTORS: -Source -Message -Audience
PROCESS:
- Attention
- Comprehension
- Acceptance or rejection
OUTCOME:
- if message is accepted -> change in attitude in
- Opinion
- Affect
- Behaviour
Hovland-Yale: Factors
Source: who is doing the persuading
Message: The content of what is said, this can take different forms e.g. advert, article
Audience: the person being persuaded
Hovland-Yale: Process
Attitude change is sequential
Attention: we are made to pay attention to the advert e.g. bombarded with daily adverts
Comprehension: we then have to understand it to be persuaded by it
We then either accept or reject the advert
Hovland-Yale: Supporting research, Hovland & Weiss
Hovland & Weiss: experts are more persuaded by non-experts
Hovland-Yale: Supporting research, Leventhal et al:
Leventhal et al: Persuasion can be enhanced if fear is aroused in the audience e.g. smoking adverts
Hovland-Yale: Supporting research, McGuire:
McGuire: Those with moderate self esteem are persuaded more easily than people with high self esteem
Organised messages are more effective than disorganised ones
Intelligent people process arguments in more depth and so are likely to reject a simple one sided argument.
Hovland-Yale: Supporting research, Kiesler & Kiesler:
Kiesler & Kiesler: Popular attractive people are more effective than unpopular and unattractive ones. Example of halo effect where someone who is attractive is seen to have other positive characteristics
Hovland-Yale: Supporting research, Qualls & Moore
Qualls & Moore: We are more likely to be persuaded by someone similar to us; same ethnic background
Hovland-Yale: Supporting research, Miller et al.:
Miller et al.: People speaking rapidly is more persuasive than people speaking slowly; because rapid speech conveys that the person knows what they’re talking about
‘Psychologists have developed models to explain the persuasive effects of media. Describe the Hovland-Yale model.’
The model, which is based is media psychology, identifies various factors which affect how persuasive media communication is. First, persuasiveness depends on the audience of the communication- for example an exert is seen to be more persuasive than someone who is not an expert, so will be more persuasive. Secondly aspects of the message are important, such as how much fear a health advert arouses. Finally the nature of the audience is important, such as levels of self esteem (those with high levels are more resistant to persuasion)
The model says that the factors can contrast with each other: when the audience is more intelligent, a message which presents both sides of an argument is more likely to persuade than a one-sided argument. It says that persuasion occurs in three stages. First we have to pay attention to a message, for example notice an advert on a billboard. Secondly we have to process it. Finally we react to the message either with accepting or rejection.
If media communication is accepted by someone s/he has been persuaded. S/he has undergone what the model calls ‘attitude change’.
Hovland Yale model as an explanation for the effectiveness of TV advertising
There are mainly two stages which are influenced by the model:
-Attention: advertisers make their advert as attractive as possible to keep people watching e.g. special effects, music, comedy, surprise and ‘mystery’ ads.
-Comprehension: viewers need to clearly understand the message e.g. the benefits of using this product, perhaps in comparison to a competitors product.
Need for cognition:
NC is a personality variable that represents the extent to which individuals enjoy and engage in effortful cognitive activities
Those with a high NC score are more likely to form attitudes by paying attention to the central arguments, while those with a low NC are more likely to use peripheral arguments.
Need for cognition supported by Vidrine et al.
-lab experiment with 227 student smokers who were measured on their NC and were then exposed to
-Fact based leaflet emphasising risks of smoking
-Emotion based leaflet emphasising risks of smoking
They found that those with a high NC responded better to the fact based leaflet and those with low NC to the emotion based leaflet.
Elaboration likelihood model:
First the person exposed to persuasive communication
Central route:
-Higher involvement with the product message
-Attention focus on ‘central’ product info
-Comprehension ‘deeper’ thoughts on product
-Persuasion by product beliefs, purchase attention
Peripheral route:
-Lower involvement with product message
-Attention on ‘peripheral’ non-product info
-Comprehension ‘shallow’ thoughts on message
-Persuasion by non-product beliefs, attitudes towards purchase