Media Flashcards
What is the clearest example of Anti social behaviour?
Aggression
What does ASB stand for?
Antisocial behaviour
Who claimed aggression is learnt?
Bandura
What two ways does Bandura claim aggression is learnt by?
By direct experience (agreed with Skinner, rewards)
By observing people (goes beyond skinner, role model)
Key elements for SLT of aggression from media
Attention
Retention
Motivation
How does SLT help explain media influences on ASB
Attention- observer pays attention to model
Retention- observer retains a memory of the observed behaviour
Motivation- Observer wants to copy behaviour
Example of Attention
Observer paying attention to violent characters
Films encourage this with exciting music and special effects
Example of Retention
Observer retains a memory of the observed behaviour
Memorable characters played by well known actors and engaging storylines make this more likely
Examples of Motivation
Observer wants to copy behaviour
What increases chances of motivation?
Role model is of high status
Observer can easily identify with role model e.g. gender, ethnicity, age
Observer sees role model get rewarded for behaviour - Vicarious reinforcement
What is Vicarious reinforcement?
Vicarious reinforcement is when the observer sees the role model being rewarded for their behaviour and is motivated to copy this behaviour as they want the same reward.
What is vicarious punishment?
Vicarious Punishment is when the observer sees the role model receiving punishment and is put off copying the behaviour due to the punishment.
Study by Bandura about children’s response to TV violence
Aim- to observe children responses to seeing a tv programme with aggressive model who is either punished, rewarded or no consequence.
Method-
IV: whether model is punished, rewarded, or nothing
DV: number of children who imitate behaviour
Ppts= 33 boys, 33 girls aged between 3yrs 6 months and 6yrs, randomly allocated to one of three conditions of 11 boys and 11 girls
Results from Bandura’s study about children’s responses to TV violence
Children in no consequence and reward condition imitated significantly more aggressive behaviours than children in model punished condition.
No difference between children in model reward condition and no consequence
Conclusion of Bandura’s study about children’s responses to TV violence
The administration of punishment reduces whether or not children imitate aggressive behaviours but it does not influence the degree to which they learn them
Evaluation of SLT explanation of media influences on ASB
using Bandura
Bandura supports SLT. All of the children were able to copy the model’s aggressive actions towards a Bobo Doll when given an incentive. Because they watched Rocky on television the study suggests that children can learn from violence shown in the media.
Children in the condition where the ending of the film showed Rocky being punished were less likely to spontaneously imitate than children in the no consequences condition. This supports SLT’s idea that if there is no vicarious punishment of aggression, viewers will be more motivated to imitate the violence they have learned.
more Evaluation of SLT of media influences on ASB
Comstock and Paik’s meta analysis of more than 1000 findings on effects of media violence showed strong shot terms effects rather than long term. They found that if person behaving violently is portrayed as similar to viewer increases effects. This supports motivation cement of SLT as if the observer can easily identify themselves with the role model they are more motivated to copy behaviour. Supports importance of identification.
Support for vicarious reinforcement:
Bandura study
Comstock and Paik’s- found that if violent behaviour is presented as being an efficient way to get what one wants which links to SLT as observer see’s role model being rewarded or achieving what they want which encourages observer to imitate behaviour. Vicarious reinforcement
Phillips- found increased rate of murders of african american males following a publicised boxing fight where black fighter lost. Found also increased murder rates of white males following boxing match where white boxer was defeated- absence of vicarious punishment, vicarious reinforcement: money.
Methodological evaluation for Bandura
Laboratory experiments supporting SLT often lack validity in how they operationalise aggression for example a Bobo Doll does not feel pain. If this were the only evidence it would undermine the validity of SLT. However findings into real world aggression e.g. Phillips and Comstock and Paiks studies into long term effects are also supportive. SLT is therefore supported by a wealth of well triangulated evidence, suggesting that it is a valid way of explaining media effects on ASB.
Desensitisation explanation of media influences on ASB
Anderson et al defines desensitisation as a reduction in distress-related physiological reactivity to observations or thoughts of violence.
Empathy is reduced due to level of exposure from films and TV- more likely to act aggressively.
Evaluation of desensitisation explanation of media influences on ASB
Grafman supports desensitisation as teenage boys were exposed to video clips of violent scenes over time and they showed reduced activity in the orbitofrontrol cortex and reduced skin conductance response. The SCR measures general emotional arousal and the OFC regulates emotional sensitivity. Thus the results suggest that exposure to violent media dulls the emotional response .
Methodological evaluation of Grafman
High control using MRI scans to measure
Wouldn’t watch that many clips consecutively, would have breaks
Only used boys
Evaluation SLT considering Desensitisation
A limitation of SLT is that it focus is exclusively psychological. It takes no account of the physiological effects of watching media violence on the brain. Therefore complementing SLT’s explanation with desensitisation gives a fuller picture than can SLT alone
Evaluate one explanation of media influences on anti-social behvaiour
- Bandura: kids copied behaviour on bobo doll with incentive: kids can learn violence
- Results of study: punished model showed kids less likely to imitate- supports SLT as vicarious punishment
- Problem as lab exp on SLT lack validity, operationalise aggression bobo doll no pain. However philips and comstock and paik results into long term effects support
- Phillips study into boxing supports copycat violence, identification:
- SLT well triangulated evidence - practical applications such as limiting amount of exposure through film censorship
- Limitation is focus’ on psychological and not physiological and brain but desensitisation helps this