Measures of Assessing Implementation Flashcards
What are the four attributes of good programs:
- ) Staffing: Programs must have adequate staffing to help run daily operations.
- ) Budgets: In order to hire staff, a program must have financial resources.
- ) Stable funding: Employees must be paid on time in order for programs to be successful.
- ) Identity: Programs must be visible or recognizable by the public.
What should staffing achieve, in order to have a good program?
Staffing: Programs must have adequate staffing to help run daily operations.
What should the budgets achieve, in order to have a good program?
Budgets: a program must have financial resources. This will allow for hiring staff.
What are the 3 specific purposes of assessing program implementation?
- ) To provide a rationale for describing program implementation,
- ) To help you plan an implementation evaluation that is both workable and useful to decision makers, and
- ) To guide you in designing instruments to produce supporting data so that you can assure yourself and your audience that you description is accurate.
What happens when a program is given an “adequate description”?
Accuracy and thoroughness will be ensured when the program is given an “adequate description”, including supporting data from different sources.
What does the implementation system simply represents?
It represents the internal workings of a program, what the key components are and how they relate to each other..
Why does implementation increases the quality of evaluation findings?
It provides insights into how programs work and why they succeed or fail, rather than just focusing on outcomes.
What questions can be asked when making a decision to judge program effectiveness by looking at outcomes?
- ) To what extent were stated program produce?
- ) How well did the participant do?
- ) Was there support for what went on in the program?
What are 4 common methods for collecting implementation data?
- ) Examining records.
- ) Conducting observations.
- ) Using self-administered questionnaires.
- ) Conducting interviews.
What are 2 methods/approaches for evaluating/assessing implementation?
- ) Quantitative Methods/Approach
2. ) Qualitative Methods/Approach
Which Method/Approach does the following:
- Focus on numbers/numeric values
- Addresses the Who, what, when, and where
- Match with outcomes about knowledge and comprehension
- Allows for measurement of variables
- Uses statistical data analysis
- May be generalize to greater population with larger samples
- Easily replicated
Quantitative Method/Approach
Which Method/Approach does the following:
- Focus on text/narrative form respondents
- Addresses the “How” and/or “Why”
- Match w/ outcomes about application, analysis, synthesis, evaluate
- Seeks to explain and understand
- Ability to capture “elusive” evidence of learning & development
Qualitative Method/Approach
When deciding to use the Qualitative Method, what are two (2) other methods to use?
- ) Relying on data collection methods that gets close to the program, usually interviews and on-site observations or participant-observations.
- ) Evaluator would typically concentrate on relating what they find, rather than comparing what should have been.
Regarding methods for assessing program implementation, what is a good way to find out what a good program look like?
Ask the people involved in the program, by using a form of interviews and questionnaires.
What is Self-Report?
Self-Reports, such as interviews and questionnaires, are personal responses of program faculty, staff, administration and participants that asks the person for direct information.