MBE General Tips and Strategy Flashcards
Why are statutes a “trigger” to take note of?
Because they often control the answer because either there are conflicdting common law rules or examiners want to see if you can ignore your instincts and read/apply elements of given statute.
In what way is each fact given in an MBE question relevant?
ou should assume that if the examiners give you a fact, that fact is somehow needed to help make the right answer right, or at least one wrong answer choice wrong.
Some ways to reword question stems
Question: “What is the most likely outcome?”
Reword to: “What will the result be — and why?”
Question: “Which claim is most likely to succeed?
Reword to: “Which is the only claim that can succeed on these facts — and why?”
Question: “What is Defendant’s best defense?”
Reword to: “Why won’t the defendant be guilty on these facts?”
Question: “If party X loses, the most likely basis for the judgment is that . . . ”
Reword to: “Party X loses because . . . ”
If you’re asked whether a certain result should occur, then…
…immediately summon to your mind the appropriate test under the rules you’ve learned.
For example, if you’re asked whether Defendant will be guilty of murder, focus on what murder requires: an unlawful killing, neither justifiable nor excusable, with malice aforethought.
If you’re asked if a state statute is constitutional, think immediately of the three-prong standard for constitutionality of state statutes: within state’s power, not violating any person’s constitutional rights, not an undue burden on interstate commerce.
in order for an answer to be correct…
every aspect of it must be correct: It must correctly characterize the facts, it must state the correct law, its result must be consistent with its reasoning (if it’s a “two part” answer), and it must address and resolve a central issue.
If a response is potentially correct… and if not…
…mark a “Y” for “yes” next to the answer in the question booklet; if not, eliminate it with an “N” for “no.”
When you first look at answers, what first should you notice?
The modifier (eg, because, only if, unless, etc.)
After looking at the modifier, what should youlook at?
The reasoning. Before you look at the result (yes, no, admissible, inadm, etc.), look to see if reasoning is incorrect due to misstating the facts, the law, or both. If reasoning is incorrect, the result can’t possibly be correct, so you can eliminate it and move on.
If “because, as, or since” is used as the modifier, the answer can be correct only if:
The reasoning addresses and resolves a central issue (or at least a more central issue than any other response);
The facts in the question completely satisfy the reasoning (that is, if the reasoning says, “because he was drunk,” the facts must state or imply unequivocally that he was drunk); and
The result is consistent with the reasoning (for instance, if the reasoning states, “because the statement was an admission by a party-opponent,” the result must be “admissible” in order for the answer to be correct).
Where “if” or “as long as” is the modifier, in order to be correct…
the reasoning need only be plausible under the facts (that is, there can’t be anything in the facts to suggest the reasoning couldn’t be true), the reasoning must address a central issue, and the result and the reasoning must agree.
When this modifier is used, the reasoning must be…
be the only circumstance under which the result cannot occur. If you can think of even one other way the result might come about, the response cannot be correct.
There are three general ways in which an answer choice can be wrong:
(1) it can mischaracterize the facts;
(2) it can misstate the law;
and/or
(3) it can ignore a central issue in the question.
This is the order in which you should address each of these possibilities. Remember, if a choice fails in any respect, you can stop your analysis, eliminate it, and move on; in order to be correct, an answer choice must be correct in every respect.
Why are factually incorrect answers sometimes a hint?
Because, if true, they contain reasoning that is legally correct. So they can help point out the legal reasoning/rule you’re applying in the question.
But beware, because they can be factually incorrect in other ways that doesn’t involve sound legal reasoning.
Common legal errors in wrong answer choices include these kinds:
kinds of legal errors:
* It may overstate the requirements of a crime, tort, or admissibility of evidence;
* It may state an antiquated or otherwise inapplicable rule;
It may state a rule that has no application to the facts;
* It may make an overinclusive statement of the law, which will
be wrong even if it happens to be correct on the facts;
or
* It may overstate or understate the correct legal standard.
An answer choice relying on res gestae as the source of admissibility for hearsay…
…can’t be correct. because it is a common-law concept not recognized by the FRE.