MBE Criminal Law Flashcards
Actus Reus
A voluntary, affirmative act or omission causing a criminally proscribed result
Voluntary Act
Physical and Voluntary
Unconscious/Asleep/Hypnosis don’t count
Duties to Act
- By statute
- Contract
- Special Relationship
- Detrimental Undertaking
- Causation
Types of Mens Rea
Specific Intent
Malice
General Intent
MPC Mens Rea
Purposely
Knowingly/Willfully
Recklessly
Negligently
Specific Intent Crimes
FIAT
First-Degree Murder
Inchoate Offenses
Assault with Intent to Commit Battery
Theft Offenses
Malice Crimes (CL)
Murder
Arson
Involves reckless disregard of a high risk of harm
Requires only a criminal act without excuse, justification, or mitigation
Intent can be inferred from accomplishing the act
General Intent Crimes
All the others not Specific or Malice
Only the intent to perform the unlawful act is required
When Transferred Intent Applies
Yes: usually homicide, battery, arson
No: attempted crimes
Applies to “bad aim” cases but not “mistaken identity”
MPC doesn’t recognize specifically, but liability recognized when purposely, knowingly, recklessly, or negligently causing a result is an element of an offense
Strict Liability Crimes
Statutory Rape; Bigamy; Regulation of Food/Drugs
Generally disfavored; must be clear legislative intent
Vicarious Liability Crimes
Generally limited to regulatory crimes with punishment limited to fines
Think corporations being liable for actions of high-ranking corporate agents representing corporate policy
Causation Requirements for Crimes
If required, the mens rea must cause the actus reus, which must cause the particular result that is unlawful
Mistake of Fact
May negate criminal intent (if “honest”)
Defense to specific intent crimes even if unreasonable
Defense to general intent or malice crimes but must be reasonable
Never a defense for strict liability crimes
Mistake of Law
Generally not an excuse
3 exceptions:
1. Reliance on high-level government interpretations
2. Lack of notice
3. Mistake of law going to an element of a specific intent crime (FIAT)
Accomplice Liability
Majority/MPC: Must act with the intent of assisting the principal to commit the crime
Minority: intentionally or knowingly aided/caused another to commit an offense
Even approving bystanders aren’t accomplices
Liable for both the planned crime and any other foreseeable crimes occurring in the course of the criminal act
Can be criminally liable even if they couldn’t be the principal or the principal can’t be convicted
Exception: someone protected by statute can’t be an accomplice in violating it (e.g., underage person not an accomplice to statutory rape)
Aiders/Abettors Liability
Individuals who aid or abet a defendant to commit a crime may be guilty of conspiracy (in addition to accomplice liability) if there was an agreement to commit the crime and an overt act was taken in furtherance of it
Criminal Facilitation
A person who is not guilty of the substantive crime (because of lack of intent) can be guilty of the lesser offense of criminal facilitation for assisting
Accessory Before the Fact
Accomplice neither physically nor constructively present during the crime but possesses the requisite intent
To Withdraw, Must:
- Repudiate prior aid;
- Do all that is possible to countermand prior assistance; and
- Do it before the chain of events is in motion/unstoppable
Accessory After the Fact
Aids/assists a felon to avoid apprehension or conviction after commission of the felony
Must know a felony was committed
Only liable for a separate crime (obstruction, etc.)
Insanity Defense Tests
4 Tests
- M’Naghten - D didn’t know either the nature/quality of the act OR the wrongfulness of it due to mental disease
- Irresistible Impulse - D lacked capacity for self control/free choice due to mental disease
- Durham - unlawful act was the product of D’s mental disease
- MPC - combines M’Naghten and Irresistible Impulse - at the time, D lacked substantial capacity to appreciate wrongfulness of the act or conform conduct to law because of mental disease
Intoxication Defense
Voluntary: intentional taking of substance known to intoxicate (need not intend actual intoxication)
Defense to Specific Intent (only if preventing intent formation)
Defense to MPC crimes “purposely” or “knowingly” that prevents formation of mental state
Involuntary: taken without knowledge or under duress
Negates elements of general intent, specific intent, and malice crimes
Murder (CL)
Unlawful killing of another living human being with malice aforethought
Malice
- Intent to kill
- Intent to do serious bodily injury
- Reckless indifference to human life (“depraved heart”)
- Intent to commit a felony (felony murder)
Felony Murder Rule
Unintended and foreseeable killing proximately caused by and during the commission or attempted commission of an inherently dangerous felony
Inherently Dangerous Felony
BARRK
Battery Arson Robbery Rape Kidnapping
When is a Defendant liable for another’s death during a felony?
Bystander by Police/Victim
Majority: Agency Theory; No
Minority: Proximate Cause Theory; Yes
Co-Felon by Police/Victim: No
Death occurring after flight from the scene of the crime isn’t included(?)