MBE Civil Procedure Flashcards
When there is Federal Question Jurisdiction
Express: expressly created by federal law that provides underlying right
Implied: right created by federal law and can be fairly implied that a cause of action was intended by Congress
Neither Express or Implied: Claim must be: 1. Necessarily raised 2. Actually disputed 3. Substantial 4. Capable of resolution in federal court without disrupting federal-state balance
Diversity Jurisdiction
Complete diversity + AIC > $75,000
Must exist when complaint is FILED
Citizenship of representative parties is used generally EXCEPT for decedents and minors/incompetents
Domicile
Individual: state where residing and intends to for an indefinite period; can only have one
Corporation: state(s) of incorporation + principal place of business; can have more than one
Standard of Proof for AIC
Plaintiff’s good faith assertion in the complaint is sufficient unless there is a legal certainty that they can’t recover that amount
When Aggregation is Permitted
Yes: 1 P - 1 D
No: 1 P - 2+ D; 2+ P - 1 D
Exception: multiple plaintiffs against single defendant can go through if a single plaintiff satisfies AIC and their claims are related
When Minimal Diversity is Enough
Federal Interpleader Act (statutory interpleader)
Class actions of > $5,000,000
Interstate mass torts if at least 75 people died in one accident and P/Ds are from many states (like an airline crash)
Assignment of a Claim
Complete assignment that is real (for value) is fine and can shift controlling domiciliary to assignee
If only partial assignment; assignor still reigns
Removal - Generally
Only proper if federal courts have SMJ and PJ
Only defendants may remove
Must get consent of all defendants to remove within 30 days of service
Automatic with filing; decision of whether removal is proper is for the federal court
Special Removal Rules for Diversity
State where suit was filed can’t be a domicile of ANY defendant
Must remove within 1 year of commencement unless plaintiff acted in bad faith to make the case non-removeable
Supplemental Jurisdiction - Generally
Federal courts with SMJ may hear additional claims arising from the same case or controversy
–> common nucleus of operative fact
Allows, but does not require - discretion of the court
Supplemental Jurisdiction - Federal Question
Additional claims may be heard if there is a common nucleus of operative fact
Supplemental Jurisdiction - Diversity
Permissive Joinder: must satisfy complete diversity; AIC not required
Compulsory Counterclaim: don’t need independent grounds at all (D) but (P) does
Permissive Counterclaim: must satisfy both complete diversity and AIC
Cross-Claims: if arising out of the same occurrence/transaction as the initial claim there’s no AIC/citizenship requirement
In Personam Jurisdiction: Bases
Generally required whenever judgment imposes a personal obligation
Voluntary Domicile Consent Long-Arm Statute Attachment of Property (requires minimum contacts if claim not about the property)
In Personam Jurisdiction: Due Process
Minimum contacts with the forum state so the action does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice
Minimum Contacts
Courts look for a purposeful availment by Defendant of the protections of the forum’s law
E.g., Defendant’s contacts with the forum state must be purposeful and substantial, such that they should reasonably anticipate (foresee) being taken to court there
Specific v. General Jurisdiction Contacts
Specific: when a cause of action arises out of/closely relates to Defendant’s conduct with the forum state (act in the state causing injury; contracting for services in the state; local property; etc.)
General: Defendant is domiciled or has continuous and systematic contacts with the forum state rendering them essentially at home
Imputed Contacts
Partnerships: each partner generally an agent of the partnership
Corporation: contacts with forum state don’t automatically establish PJ over a wholly-owned subsidiary unless it is the parent’s alter ego or acting as an agent
Employees/Agents: contacts by nonresident agent/employees are imputed to the employer if they are acting within the scope of their agency/employment (usually not for independent contractors)
Fair Play and Substantial Justice Factors
- Interest of the forum state in adjudicating the matter
- Burden on Defendant of appearing
- Interest of the judicial system in the efficient resolution of controversies
- Shared interests of the states in promoting common social policies
In Rem Jurisdiction
Court authority to determine issues concerning rights to real/personal property
Must satisfy due process
Property generally must be present within the forum state
Quasi in Rem
Determines only the interests of parties to the action regarding property located in the forum state (lien foreclosure or quiet title action)
Is not personally binding against Defendant
If the disputes are unrelated to the ownership of the property with no close relationship, minimum contacts must be shown between Defendant and forum state
Federal Exceptions to PJ Requirements
Federal Interpleader Act: nationwide service of process establishes PJ
Bulge Provision: service anywhere within 100 miles of federal courthouse for (1) impleading 3rd party defendants and (2) joining necessary parties
Unusual Provision: nationwide service of process when Plaintiff’s claim arises under federal law and Defendant isn’t subject to PJ in any state court (think foreign defendants without contacts to states)
Notice & Service of Process: General Rules for In Personam
Notice must be reasonable under the circumstances
Within 90 days of filing
Can be waived (extends time to serve answer from 21 to 60 days; 90 if foreign)
Request for waiver must wait at least 30 days for an answer
Always ok: in-hand personal delivery; serving someone at Defendant’s dwelling over 18; delivery to authorized agent; registered mail, return receipt requested (for foreign Defendants)
Aim to do this if you know who the parties are for In Rem and Quasi in Rem too
Special Service of Process Rules
Infants: serve minor and parent or guardian
Adjudicated Incompetent: serve incompetent and guardian
Partnership: serve general partner, attorney in fact, or authorized agent
Corporation: serve officer, director, managing agent, or agent appointed to receive service of process
Non-Resident Motorists: serve a state official who forwards a copy to Defendant
Service of Process for In Rem and Quasi in Rem
Must make a diligent effort to locate all claimants and serve them personally
If cannot be located, notice by publication is permitted
Federal Venue is Proper where:
- Any Defendant resides, so long as ALL defendants reside in the state
- Where the claim arose (where a substantial part of the events or omissions occurred or where a substantial part of the property is located)
- If 1 & 2 fail, then any district where Defendant is subject to PJ
* If filed in state court and removed, venue is automatically proper in the federal district where the state court sits, even if that wouldn’t be proper otherwise
Defining Residence in Venue Terms
Individual: residence = domicile
Business Entities: every district in which PJ exists
Change of Venue: Original Venue Proper
If Diversity Jurisdiction: the new district must apply law from the previous court
If Federal Question: the new district will apply federal law as interpreted by its own court of appeals (if in another circuit)
Change of Venue: Original Venue Improper
If Diversity Jurisdiction: the new district applies the choice-of-law rules of its home state
If Federal Question: the new district applies its own COA interpretation of the law
Forum Non Conveniens (Federal)
Only used when a forum is deemed most appropriate for an action is a state or foreign court
Burden generally is on Defendant, but if a forum selection clause designates a state or foreign court, the burden shifts to Plaintiff
Erie
State substantive law
Federal procedural law
How to tell if something is substantive or procedural
- Valid federal statute on point when state/federal conflict:
Federal Rules Enabling Act: does the federal rule abridge, enlarge, or modify a substantive right?
No: apply federal rule
Yes: apply federal rule only if it only incidentally affects a litigant’s substantive rights - No federal rule on point:
Apply state law if not doing so would lead to different outcomes - Substantive law: elements of a claim or defense, SOL, tolling provisions, burden of proof (choice of law)
- Procedural law: judge/jury allocation, assessment of attorney’s fees, equitable/legal determination