MBE Contracts Flashcards
Misrepresentation
An untrue assertion of fact
K can be voided/rescinded if a party has been defrauded through a fraudulent misrepresentation bc it means there was no meeting of the minds
Misrepresentation can lead to mistake of basic assumptions so these may go together
Examples of Misrepresentation
Non-disclosures
False assertions
Are contracts with minors voidable?
Yes, but only by the minor
If you decided to K with a minor, you can’t later say you want to void just bc they’re a minor
“Perfect Tender Rule” in Ks for the sale of goods
Both the goods themselves and their delivery must perfectly conform to the requirements of the contract
Otherwise there is breach and party isn’t required to accept the goods
A contract is best characterized as a(n)
Legally enforceable agreement
Predominant Purpose rule
Used to determine if K is governed by the UCC or the common law.
Asks whether K is predominantly about a good or a service.
Offer
An objective manifestation of a willingness to enter into an agreement (by the offeror) that creates a power of acceptance in the offeree
Essential term under the UCC?
Quantity
An advertisement is generally…
an invitation to deal
But may be treated otherwise if its a reward advertisement/or specific
What test governs offer and acceptance?
The objective test.
Must show an objective intent to be bound
4 Types of Irrevocable Offers
(1) Unilateral Ks (partial perf)
(2) Firm offers (merchant)
(3) Option Ks
(4) Detrimental reliance
6 ways to revoke an offer
(1) expressly communicating/direct revocation
(2) offeree learns of constructive revocation/indirect revocation
(3) rejection
(4) counter-offer (bc rejection)
(5) offeror dies
(6) Lapse/reasonable time passes
Can a terminated offer be revived by the offeror?
Yes, even if an offer is squashed, the offeror can always throw out a new offer with the exact same terms as before (“revival”).
Firm Offer Requirements
A firm offer must be
(1) written and signed by the offeror (merchant); and
(2) contain an explicit promise not to revoke
Lasts either: (i) as long as stated in the offer, or (ii) for a reasonable time period not to exceed 90 days unless there’s consideration
Bilateral vs. Unilateral
Bilateral = promise for a promise
Unilateral = promise for performance
Is an offeree required to finish performing in a unilateral K?
No, bc you can’t make someone accept your offer.
So, offeror can’t require offeree to complete performance
How do you accept an ambiguous offer that can be either unilateral or bilateral?
Acceptance can be by either performance or a return promise
Acceptance
Objective manifestation of an intent to be bound, by the offeree
If a seller of goods ships the wrong goods, have they accepted?
Yes, but they’re also in breach
name what the mailbox rule wont apply to
rejections
counteroffers
option Ks
It only applies to acceptances sent on dispatch.
Mailbox Rule Exception
If—Rejection then acceptance…..whatever letter arrives first prevails
*acceptance effective on dispatch
* everything else is effective upon receipt
§ 2-207(1)
Acceptance or counteroffer/no k?
- A definite/seasonable acceptance sent within a reasonable time is valid with additional/different terms UNLESS:
- The (offeree’s) acceptance is expressly conditioned on the offeror’s assent to their new addt’l term(s) (counteroffer)
- “Deal but not unless/if and only if/on the condition”
If acceptance,
then move on to § 2-207(2)
§ 2-207(2)
Which terms of the § 2-207(1) acceptance will control: new addt’l terms OR the gap fillers
For K between merchants New addt’l terms will control UNLESS:
(1) new term materially alters the K
(2) the offeror limits acceptance to the terms of its offer
(3) the offeror objects to the additional terms within a reasonable time
Knock-Out Rule
§ 2-207(2)
“Knocks out” both of the parties’ different terms and applies gap fillers
§ 2-207(3)
Acceptance based on conduct despite no K formation which creates a new K
Here, only overlapping terms become part of the K and the rest is supplied by gap fillers
§ 2-207—Confirming Memo
early agreement + later there’s a written confirmation with new terms
- Work through the same steps as § 2-207(2).
- But the new terms will very rarely come in.
Under the common law, what does a conditional acceptance functions as?
A counter-offer
Illusory promise
Where one side is not really committing to the deal under the objective test; so there’s no consideration.
- “I’d like to buy your car when I have more money.”
- “When the economy gets better/or when I feel like it, I will pay $5K for your car.”
Are satisfaction contracts illusory?
No, they’re real contracts with consideration.
“I promise to pay you $500 if you paint a portrait of my family that meets my satisfaction.”
Is promising not to sue sufficient consideration?
Yes, only if
- the P has a good faith-belief in the validity of the claim OR
- there’s reason to doubt the validity of the claim due to uncertain law
Pre-existing Duty Rule
A promise to do something you’re already legally obligated to do is not consideration
Exceptions to the Pre-existing Duty Rule
(1) A change in performance
(2) A third party promising to pay
(3) Unforeseen difficulties that would excuse performance
UCC Contract Modifications
Under UCC, no consideration is needed for modifications, only good faith
*unless modification subject to SOF like sale of goods $500+
Is not doing something you’re legally entitled to do, a legal detriment for consideration?
Yes
Are output and requirements contracts illusory?
No,
There’s a way for a party to breach:
- by requiring the product and purchasing from others; or
- by making the product and selling to others.
Output K vs. Requirement K
Output = Seller promises to sell buyer all they make
Requirement = Buyer promises to buy all they require
*They satisfy quantity under UCC
Promissory Estoppel
No K, just statement inducing to detrimentally rely; making promise become enforceable
Elements:
(1) a promise that would be reasonably expected to induce reliance
(2) detrimental reliance on the promise
(3) injustice can only be avoided by enforcing the promise
Quasi-Contract
(contract implied-in-law)
When you would’ve made a K if you could but you couldn’t OR when one
party conferred a benefit on another party and it’s only fair to pay that back
Goal: k made by law to prevent unjust enrichment
Elements:
(1) P confers a measurable benefit on D;
(2) Benefit is conferred with the expectation of payment; and
(3) It’d be unfair to let D keep the benefit without
paying.
Examples:
- Prof faints. Student calls 911. Later asks Prof to pay back. Student can recover.
- X paints your house then force demands pay. They wont recover.
Types of consideration substitutes
- Promissory Estoppel
- Quasi-contract
- Moral Obligation Plus Subsequent Promise
(only here can a promise with no consideration be enforced)
Breach
Once a duty to perform exists, nonperformance is a breach of contract unless the duty is discharged
What are the measure of damages to an injured buyer in a K for sale of real estate?
the difference between the K price and the fair market value of the property at the time of the breach + any incidental/consequential damages
Intended Third Party Beneficiary
3rd party that the original parties intended to benefit.
* They were discussed/mentioned in the K
* They may have rights to sue original party if rights have vested
Their right vests when:
- They’re notified of the benefit; or
- They learn about it and begin to rely on it
(at which point promisor/promisee stop retaining power to modify/discharge the duty owed to the intended beneficiary)
When do the rights of an Intended Third Party Beneficiary vest?
(1) They manifest assent to the K (become aware)
(2) They detrimentally rely on it
(at which point promisor/promisee stop retaining power to modify/discharge the duty owed to the intended beneficiary)
(3) they filed a lawsuit to enforce the K
Incidental Third Party Beneficiary
Someone who is benefiting from the K but has no rights to enforce the it bc that wasn’t the primary purpose of the K
May a court reform the writing of a K if it failed to express the actual agreement between both parties due to a mutual mistake?
Yes, it may reform the writing to be an accurate expression of the agreement
Is party A obligated to perform when party B partially breaches?
Yes, when a party has committed only a partial breach, the other party is still obligated to perform.
If they don’t the partially-breaching party has the right to specific performance or damages for total breach
Common Law Modification
- Requires assent + consideration
- could be oral or written
What are the damages for breach of warranty under the UCC?
The position they party would’ve been in, but-for the breach
Can a party recover consequential damages if those damages could’ve been avoided?
No, a victim of breach is entitled to recover only those damages that couldn’t have been reasonably avoided
When may a party’s silence be actionable as nondisclosure?
- When the party engages in active concealment or
- When the party owes a fiduciary duty to the other party.
Duress
An improper threat that deprives a party from making a meaningful choice to contract
Unconscionability
- Procedural
- Substantive
Procedural unconscionability is a defect in the bargaining process
Substantive unconscionability is an exploitive contractual term.
Topics to consider whether there is an enforceable K
(All Contracts Don’t Stink)
All Contracts Don’t Stink
Acceptance
Consideration
Defenses
Statute of Frauds
2 main ways to satisfy the SOF?
- Having a signed writing by D
- By some performance on the deal (unless service K, then needs full by 1 party)
Does a K made in consideration of marriage like a prenup fall under SOF?
Yes
SOF: Surety
Main Purpose Exception
Not in SOF world if the main purpose in agreeing to pay the debt of another is for that surety’s own economic advantage
(bc if it was for you all along then no risk of fraud to being w)
SOF:
Ks cant be performed under 1 year
- impossible to perform under 1 year
- K that can’t be performed within 1 year from its making
Luke Skywalker hires you to teach him contract law for the rest of his life. Are we in Statute of Frauds world?
No bc it is at least possible that he’d die within the year.
SOF 1 year: applies ONLY to Ks impossible to performed under 1 yr
What does a writing need to satisfy SOF?
(1) names and signatures of the parties
(2) essential elements of deal
what types of performance would satisfy SOF in a real estate K?
Having 2/3:
- possession
- partial payment
-improvements to the land
(*In FL you need 3/3)
SOF
Signed Writing for UCC
- doesnt need to mention price, just quantity
- will only be enforceable for the quantity on shown in the K
Does part performance satisfy the SOF for UCC?
Yes, part performance satisfies the SOF for UCC, but only for the quantity delivered and accepted
Can a maker of custom-made goods satisfy the SOF by making a substantial beginning toward the manufacturing of the goods?
Yes
Can a judicial admission that a K was actually made satisfy SOF under the UCC?
Yes
Includes a statement in a pleading or during testimony, etc
If both parties are merchants, how many days of failing to object to a confirming memo would satisfy SOF under UCC?
10 days
(but both need to be merchants!!! as part of job they read emails so if they don’t respond they must’ve seen it and been ok)
SOF
Equal Dignity Rule
You need a signed writing to authorize an agent to form a K that’d fall in SOF world
When do modifications need to separately satisfy SOF?
If modification in SOF world then you need to satisfy SOF reqs for the modification
(ex: sold car for $500 then modified to add tires for $501; need to satisfy.)
If not you dont, even if OG did need to satisfy SOF
(ex: sold car for $500 then modified to add tints for $15; dont need to satisfy)
Regarding services contracts, what is the minimum that must be done for the K to satisfy SOF?
Full performance of the contract by 1 party
3 Warranties Under the UCC
(1) Express Warranty
(2) Implied Warranty of Merchantability
(3) Implied Warranty of Fitness for a Particular Purpose
Warranty
A promise about a term of that explicitly shifts risk to the party making the promise (seller)
Express Warranty
A promise that affirms/describes the goods + is part of the basis of the bargain
Includes: samples/models
Doesn’t include: seller’s opinion
Can a merchant who is selling something they don’t usually sell/one-off sale have an Implied Warranty of Merchantability?
No
Implied Warranty of Merchantability
- when the seller is a merchant who deals with the goods at issue
- warrants that the goods are fit for their ordinary commercial purpose
- implied if not disclaimed
What is the effect of selling something “As is”
it disclaims all warranties
Can you disclaim Implied Warranty of Merchantability?
Yes
- If it’s in writing— must be conspicuous!!!
- If oral—must use the term “merchantability”
Implied Warranty of Fitness for a Particular Purpose
Implied when (1) the buyer intends to use the goods for a particular purpose, and (2) they rely on the seller’s expertise to select the goods
- Seller doesn’t have to be a merchant
How can the “Implied Warranty of Fitness for a Particular Purpose” be disclaimed?
Must be:
- in writing
- conspicuous!!!
How can a condition in K be waived?
- words
- conduct
- hindering its occurrence
How can a buyer disclaim/waive any defects that’d usually be warranted under the Implied Warranty of Merchantability?
The Implied Warranty of Merchantability is disclaimed/waived for defects that an examination would have revealed if the buyer either:
> examined the goods as fully as desired before entering the contract
or
refused to examine the goods before entering the contract
Must express conditions must be strictly satisfied?
Yes