MBE Constitutional Law Flashcards
Acc to EP what level of scrutiny is applied when these groups are being singled out:
Race
Alienage
National Origin
Strict scrutiny (gov/necessary/compelling)
STRICT = government burden to prove law is necessary to achieve COMPELLING interest
Acc to EP what level of scrutiny is applied when these groups are being singled out:
Everyone else
Rational Basis (P/not rationally/legitimate)
RATIONAL: plaintiff has burden to show law
NOT RATIONALLY related to LEGITMATE interest
Acc to EP what level of scrutiny is applied when these groups are being singled out:
Gender
Illegitimacy
Intermediate Scrutiny (gov/substantially/important)
INTERIM = government burden to prove law (S)UBSTANTIALLY related to (I)MPORTANT interest
can federal courts give advisory opinions?
No, fed courts only empowered to decide cases and controversies
can a federal court opine on whether proposed legislation would be constitutional?
no, that’s advisory opinion
who does the Eleventh Amendment generally prohibits a suit against?
suits are prohibited against the states for money damages
unless:
> state consents to the suit; or
> congress chose to abrogate the sovereign immunity through an enumerated power
do local governments have sovereign immunity? (county, city etc)
No, just states and state agencies
(from money damages only)
do individual state officers have sovereign immunity?
no; if they can be sued in a personal capacity
can injunctive relief against state officers be sought in a lawsuit?
yes bc they only have immunity form money damages
exception to sovereign immunity
(1) Congress can abrogate state sovereign immunity to
enforce certain individual rights
Reqs:
> intent must be clear
> they have to be exercising a power under civil war amends. aka 13th, 14th, 15th
> can’t abrogate through Article 1
(2) state can consent to suit
*The US govt is allowed to sue states bc consent is implied in the Constitution
can a SC hear a case that’s AISG?
No, bc its grounds are:
> Adequate:
state law would end up controlling anyways so why grant cert
> Independent:
state’s ruling doesn’t dependent on an interpretation of federal law
true or false:
The U.S. Supreme Court will not review a state court decision when the party claiming a federal right is successful under state law.
true
what is standing and what are the elements?
Standing is about who can sue.
Elements:
(1) Injury in fact:
concrete (actual/imminent) + particularized (not common to all members of public)
(2) Causation: injury is caused by D
(3) Redressability: relief requested must be able to prevent or remedy the injury
when is a case justiciable?
when it is subject to trial in court
Taxpayer standing
> taxpayers have standing to challenge their own tax assessment
> no standing to challenge govt expenditures (our tax money that govt spends)
* unless its within the establishment clause
Organizational standing
An organization an sue for its members if:
> member would’ve had standing anyway
> interests are germane to the org’s purpose
Legislative standing
> Legislators never have standing to sue what what voted against
> Legislature may have standing if the claim has to do w its institutional functions
Third party standing
generally not allowed except for these special relationships:
- doctor
- school
- bartenders
- parents
ripeness
case not ready for trial bc nothing has happened yet; law hasn’t been enacted/passed yet so it cant be unconstitutional
“no case or controversy”
Mootness
case is over, nothing left to litigate
“no case or controversy”
exception:
> wont be dismissed if: person will be subjected to the same action but the action wont last long enough to get through the judicial system
Political Question Doctrine
prohibits fed courts from adjudicating bc:
> diff branch has discretion
court lacks judicially discoverable/manageable standards to resolve the issue
4 types of Abstention Doctrines
These doctrines abstain from deciding claims when there are strong state interests
(1) Pullman:
Unsettled law
(2) Younger:
Pending criminal case
(3) Burford:
Complex state regulatory scheme
(4) Colorado River:
Simultaneous similar state/federal cases
3 forms of activities Congress can regulate through their commerce clause power
(1) channels of interstate comm.
- highways, railroads, seaways
(2) instrumentalities of interstate comm.
- cars, boats, trains
(3) any behavior that has a substantial effect on interstate commerce
~ Anything about passing law about a good/widget is const
- Behaviors can be judged in the aggregate
- congress only needs a rational basis to conclude the aggregate of something substantially affect interstate commerce