Matter Waves Flashcards

1
Q

de Broglie Hypothesis

A

-suggested that particles could behave like waves
-this argument is based on symmetry, if light can have both eave and particle nature why cant other particles have wave nature
ρ = h/λ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Davisson-Germer Experiment

Equipment

A
  • electrons accelerated through a p.d.
  • high speed electrons aimed at a nickel crystal target in a vacuum
  • the nickel could be rotated to observe the angular dependence of the electron scattering
  • the electron detector was mounted on an arc so that the electron beam could be observed from different angles
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Davisson-Germer Experiment

Observations

A
  • it was found that at certain angles there was a peak in the scattered electron intensity
  • this peak indicated that that the electrons were behaving as waves and being diffracted by the nickel lattice
  • this was the first application of wave nature to a particle
  • using de Broglie’s Law they were able to estimate the lattice spacing of the nickel crystal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The Bragg Condition

Description

A
  • this describes the condition required for x-rays to scatter with constructive interference from the atomic planes in a crystal
  • if a wave, II, travels further than a wave, I, then if the path difference is an integer number of wavelengths then the two waves will be in phase an will add constructively/coherently
  • the same is true for a particle where, λ = de Broglie wavelength
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The Bragg Condition

Equation

A

2dsinθ = nλ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

G. P. Thomson’s Experiment

A
  • fired x rays and electrons at a target
  • behind the target there was a photographic plate
  • both xrays and electrons produced the same 2D diffraction pattern
  • a series of rings inside each other
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

The Principle of Complementarity

A

in a measurement, the behaviour will either be a particle or a wave, but not both simultaneously

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Calculating the Velocity of a Free Electron by treating it as a Wave

A
Vp = fλ = ω/k
Vp = velocity

E = ℏω = ℏ²k²/2m

ω(k) = ℏk²/2m
this is the dispersion relation for free electrons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Dispersion Relation of Free Electrons

Equation

A

ω(k) = ℏk²/2m

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Dispersion Relation

Definition

A

-dispersion relations are functions relating ω and k or f and λ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Where does the name dispersion relation come from ?

A
  • when white light enters a prism, the velocity of the light in the prism depends on its wavelength
  • the spectrum is revealed because the refraction of the light is dependent on its wavelength, i.e. some wavelengths refract more than others
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Why do we need wave packets?

A

Vp = ω/k = ℏk/2m
BUT, ρ = ℏk
SO, Vp = ρ/2m
Vp = mv/2m
Vp = v/22
-this is a problem as it means that the wave will be lagging behind the particle but the wave and particle are supposed to describe the same object
-this isn’t the only problem, a pure sinusoidal wave is also infinite in extent which doesn’t correspond with the idea that it represents a small particle
-hence we need an alternative way do describe particles as waves, we use wavepackets

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Why are wavepackets a better representation of a particle than a pure sinusoidal wave?

A
  • they peak in a definite place

- does not extend far beyond the peak

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is a wave packet?

A
  • constructed from many waves

- it is peaked and rapidly decays to zero on either side of this peak

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Wavepacket - Wavelength

A

-the wavelength f a wavepacket is defined as an average and may not be constant over time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Wavepacket - Velocity

A
  • there are two velocities associated with a wavepacket
  • one, Vp, is the product of the frequency and wavelength
  • the other is the velocity with which the wave packet itself moves
17
Q

Electron Wave Function

A

Ψ = Asin(kx-ωt)

18
Q

Finding Phase and Group Velocity

superposition of two waves with slightly different wave vectors and angular frequencies

A

Ψ(x,t)=
Asin(k1x-ω1t)+Asin(k2x-ω2t)

[as k1~k2 and ω1~ω2]

=2Acos((k1-k2)x/2-(ω1-ω2)t/2)sin((k1+k2)x/2-(ω1+ω2)t/2)

[if k=k1+k2/2 and Δk=k1-k2/2]

=2Acos(Δkx-Δωt)sin(kx-ωt)
Vp = ω/k
Vg = Δω/Δk

19
Q

Group Velocity of a Free Electron Wavepacket

A
the dispersion relation for free electrons is:
ω(k) = ℏk²/2m
Vg = Δω/Δk = dω/dk
Vg = d(ℏk²/2m)/dk
Vg = 2ℏk/2m
Vg = ℏk/m, ρ = ℏk
so, Vg = ρ/m = v
-the velocity is the same for the wavepacket as it is when we model the electron as a particle
20
Q

What is the relationship between phase and group velocities for a free electron?

A

Vg = 2Vp

21
Q

In general, what is the relationship between phase and group velocities?

A

Vp = ω/k, so ω = kVp

Vg = dω/dk
Vg = d(kVp)/dk
Vg = Vp + k(dVp/dk)
22
Q

What is the relationship between phase and group velocities for photons?

A

Vp = Vg = c

23
Q

The Born Rule

A

-the wave function is given by Ψ = Asin(kx-ωt)
-the born rule states that
|Ψ²| = the probability of finding the particle at a certain position
-this probability is not a single number but a range of numbers spread over a distance Δx

24
Q

Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle

A

ΔxΔρ ~ ℏ/2

-we cannot know the position (energy) and momentum (time) of quantum particle simultaneously

25
Q

Particles in a Box

Comparision With Light in a Box

A
  • when we considered light in a box it had quantised energies and boundary conditions at the walls of the box
  • if particle behaviour can be modelled as wave behaviour then the same should be true for particles in a box
26
Q

Particles in a Box

Allowed Wavelengths

A

-for a box of side length L, the particle wavelength is restricted by:
L = Nλ/2, where N
is an integer

27
Q

Particles in a Box

Allowed Energies

A
-assuming the particle is moving slowly so that special relativity is not needed:
E = ρ²/2m and ρn=h/λn
so, En = ρn²/2m
En = h²/2m*λn²
BUT λn=2L/n
En = n²(h²/8mL²)
En = n²E1
where E1=h²/8mL² is the lowest possible energy, the ground state energy in the box
28
Q

Normalisation Condition

A

(-∞,∞) ∫ Ψ² dx

  • if we a particle at all then the probability of finding it somewhere must be 1
  • so the sum of the probabilities over all the possible values of x must equal 1
29
Q

Probability Density

A

P(x) = Ψ²(x)

30
Q

Ground State Energy for a Particle in a Box

A

E1=h²/8mL²

31
Q

Standing-Wave Functions for a Particle in a Box

A

Ψn(x) = √(2/L) * sin(nπ* x/L)