Matching / terms / definitions - Logic Flashcards

1
Q

Amphiboly

A

Ambiguity arising from syntax (word order or grammatical structure)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Accent

A

Ambiguity arising from voice inflection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Slanting

A

Assuming the value or disvalue of a thing in the very description of it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Slogans

A

use of a slogan as a substitute for an argument

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Hyperbole

A

Exaggeration. Commonly the absurd extension of the other person’s claim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Straw Man

A

Refuting an unfairly weak, stupid, or ridiculous version of your opponent’s argument instead of the more reasonable idea he actually holds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Ad Hominem

A

An argument or attack directed at the person instead of the issue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Ad Verecundiam

A

The illegitimate appeal to authority instead of reason

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Ad Baculum

A

Appeal to force or fear instead of reason

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Ad Ignominiam

A

Appeal to shame instead of reason

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Ad Populum

A

Appeal to common opinion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Ad Ignorantiam

A

Appeal to ignorance.

Assumes argument is true because it has not been proven false

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Dicto Simpliciter

A

Saying something too simply - that is, applying a general principle to a special case without the necessary qualification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Special Case

A

Opposite of Dicto Simpliciter - arguing that something is simply true because it is true in some special case - treating a special case as if it were a general rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Composition

A

Arguing from the part to the whole, ignoring the fact that what is true of a part might not be true of the whole

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Division

A

Opposite of composition - arguing from the whole to the part, ignoring the fact that what is true of the whole might not be true of every part

17
Q

The Black and White Fallacy

A

Arguing from one extreme to the other without allowing for gradations or means between the extremes

18
Q

Quoting out of Context

A

Quoting out of context, either real or literary

19
Q

Stereotyping

A

Failing to make room for exceptions to artificial, socially - constructed, changeable generalizations

20
Q

Non Sequitor

A

The conclusion does not follow from the premises (due to its contents rather than logical form)

21
Q

Ignoratio Elenchi

A

Giving reasons that prove a different conclusion than the argument purports to prove (irrelevant conclusion, missing the point)

22
Q

Begging the Question

A

Assuming what you are supposed to be proving

23
Q

Complex Question

A

Asking a question that cannot be answered without begging another question

24
Q

Arguing in a Circle

A

Using a conclusion to justify a premise after using that premise to justify that conclusion

25
Q

Contradictory Premises

A

2 premises contradicting each other, a premise contradicting a conclusion, a premise contradicting itself

26
Q

False Assumption

A

Making a false assumption about what is implied by a statement

27
Q

Hasty Generalization

A

Concluding to a general principle from too few specific instances

28
Q

Post Hoc

A

After this therefore on account of this.

Arguing that one thing is caused by another simply because it came after the other

29
Q

Hypothesis Contrary to Fact

A

If only X were true (which it isn’t), then Y would be true

30
Q

False Analogy

A

Using an analogy to try to prove anything

31
Q

Argument from Silence

A

Arguing that someone did not do or think something because they never mentioned it

32
Q

Selective Evidence

A

Referring only to the evidence that supports your thesis and ignoring the evidence that undermines it

33
Q

Slanting the Question

A

Asking a question in a way that pushes a certain answer

34
Q

Equivocation

A

The same term is used in two or more different senses in the course of an argument

35
Q

Ad Misericordiam

A

Appeal to pity instead of reason