Marriage Flashcards
PPT - Arcani Notes
what is marriage (constitutional concept)
Marriage is an inviolable social institution, is the foundation of the family and shall be protected by the state
Article XV (The Family) Section 2 of the 1987 Constitution
what is marriage (statutory concept)
marriage is a special contract of permanent union between a man and a woman entered into in accordance with law for the establishment of conjugal and family life.
It (marriage) is the foundation of the family & an inviolable social institution whose [nci] nature, consequences, and incidents are governed by law and NOT subject to stipulation
except that marriage settlements may fix the property relations DURING the marriage within the limits provided by this Code.
LB: Article 1 of Family Code (1987) (E.O. 209)
Dual aspect of marriage
it is a contract
creates a status
what are the essential requisites of marriage in order to be valid?
[or]
when can we say that there is a valid marriage?
No marriage shall be valid, unless these essential requisites are present
- LEGAL CAPACITY of the contracting parties who must be a male and a female, and;
- CONSENT FREELY given in the presence of the solemnizing officer
LB: Art. 2 FC
What constitutes ‘Legal Capacity’?
- must be male and female
- 18 > y.o. above
- absence of any legal impediment (art. 37, 38, 41)
Is psychological incapacity a legal impediment to marry?
No, psychological incapacity is not considered a legal impediment to marry.
it does not act as a barrier to entering into a marriage initially, but rather as a basis to nullify the marriage after it has been contracted under Art. 36
Psychological incapacity refers to a spouse’s inability to fulfill the essential marital obligations, and if proven, it can render the marriage null and void.
Is non-compliance w/ Art. 52 in relation to Art. 50 & 43(2) a legal impediment?
Yes, non-compliance w/ 52 constitutes a legal impediment.
52 mandates that the
- DANM
- partition & distribution of properties of Sps.
- delivery of PL
shall be RECORDED in
- appropriate civil registry, and
- registry of properties
OTHERWISE, it will have no effect on third persons (new person who wants to marry the annulled person)
IOW, non-compliance would be as if the previous marriage still exists (even with DANM) therefore subsequent marriage would be VOID
what are the formal requisites of marriage?
- authority of the solemnizing officer
- a valid marriage license exc in cases provided for in Chap 2 of this Title, and;
- a marriage ceremony
a. which takes place with the appearance of the contracting parties before the SO [and]
b. their personal declaration that they take each other as husband and wife
c. in the presence of NOT LESS than (2) two witnesses of legal age.
Formal Requisites > Authority of the solemnizing officer >
who may solemnize marriage? (Art. 7) & (LGC, S444, p(b)(1)(xviii)
- incumbent members of the Judiciary within its jurisdiction
- Priest, etc. of any church or religious sect DULY AUTHORIZED by the same [and]
REGISTERED with the civil registrar general …
provided that at least (1) one of the contracting parties belongs to the solemnizing officer’s church or religious sect
- Ship captain or airplane chief in articulo mortis while at sea/flight but also during stopovers at ports of call (31)
- Military commander of a unit to which a chaplain is assigned, in the absence of the latter, during a military operation, only inc cases in (32)
- Consul general, consul, or vice consul in cases of Art. 10
- City or Municipal Mayor
Formal Requisites > valid marriage license >
who may issue marriage license?
Local Civil Registrar
how long is the validity of a marriage license?
120 days valid from its issuance (and) can be used anywhere in the Philippines
Note: The requirement of residency is only relevant for
purposes of applying for a marriage license - because once
a marriage license is issued or obtained, the marriage may
be solemnized ANYWHERE.
Formal Requisites > valid Marriage ceremony
Is a marriage solemnized on-line valid?
Yes, it did not say personally appeared
- Cite Art. 3
Formal Requisites > valid Marriage ceremony
where can the marriage ceremony be solemnized?
GEN RULE & EXC
[Art. 8]
1. chambers of the judge [or] in open court
- church, chapel, temple
- office of consul, vice-consul, consul-general
[Exc]
1. in articulo mortis
2. remote places so far located [29]
3. both parties, in writing to S.O. house or place [29]
Specific Examples of VOID Mrgs. due to ABSENCE of ESSENTIAL requisites
absent essential = void
[Absence of Consent]
- Mrg. in jest
- mistaken identity
[Absence of legal capacity]
- either below 18
- same sex
- incestuous
- void by public policy
- big or poly mrg.
Cite Specific Instances where any of the ESSENTIAL reqs of mrg is DEFECTIVE
defective essential = voidable
[Defective Consent]
- Mrg. either is of unsound mind (45(2)
- consent obtained by fraud (45(3)
- consent obtained by [fiu] force, intimidation, or undue influence (45(4)
[Defective Legal Capacity]
- Party 18-21 > Mrg. Solemnize > No Consent [pg/spa] (45(1))
p.s.
spa - substitute parental authority
Specific Examples of VOID Mrgs. due to ABSENCE of FORMAL requisites
absent formal = void
[Absence of Solemnizing Officer]
- does not have legal authority to solemnize (w/ exc.)
[Absence of marriage license]
-** total absence** of ML
- ML expired at time of solemnization of marriage
- AoCohabitation under r34 is falsified
[Absence of marriage ceremony]
- signed marriage contract [w/o a S.O.] & [w/o actual wedding ceremony] (Pp v. Morigo)
Juan and Maria have been living together as husband and wife for over five years without any interruption. They share a house, attend family gatherings together, and are recognized in their community as a couple. Juan now wishes to formalize their relationship and plans to marry Maria. He seeks to execute an Affidavit of Cohabitation under Article 34 of the Family Code, stating that they have lived together continuously for more than five years without any legal impediment to marry.
However, during their relationship, Juan has not obtained a legal separation or annulment from his previous marriage to Ana, which remains subsisting.
Can Juan validly execute the Affidavit of Cohabitation and marry Maria without a marriage license?
No. While it is true that Juan has been consistently living together with Maria for more than 5 years and may execute an affidavit of cohabitation as an exception to the formal requisite of a valid marriage license, he however has a legal impediment as he still has a valid and subsisting marriage with Ana so Art. 34 will not apply
Distinguish total absence of consent from vitiated consent
total absence - void
vitiated/defective consent - voidABLE
Cite Specific Instances where IRREGULARLITY in a FORMAL req of Mrg.
irregular formal = valid
[Irregular Authority of SO]
- Mrg solemnized by a judge outside of territorial JD of the court
[Irregular ML]
- ML issued violating 10 day notice of publication requirement
- ML issued by LCR of the city/municipality where none of the parties reside
- ML issued w/o PA [and] Cert of Mrg. Cnsling w/in the prohibitive period [15, 16]
[Irregular MC]
- absent 2 witnesses req
- witnesses not of legal age
- solemnize in wrong venue
- absent verbal exchange of “I DOs” [exc when] the parties signed the Marriage Certificate
- absent marriage certificate [exc when] the parties personally & publicly declare in the presence of the SO & witnesses that they take each other as husband and wife
Formal Req > Marriage solemnized w/o ML is void
exceptions
v. armmm
- in articulo mortis [27]
- remote places so far located [28]
- during voyage [31]
- w/in zones of military operations [32]
- among muslims or ethnic cultural communities [33]
- ratification of marital cohabitation [34]
If the parties believed that the senator who solemnized the marriage is authorized.
Does the exception apply?
Would your answer be the same had the solemnizing officer be judge but no longer an incumbent member of the judiciary?
- This is mistake of law. Senators are not authorized by law to do so and Ignorance with the law excuses no one therewith
- this is mistake of fact