Managing Client Relationships MCQs Flashcards

1
Q

A solicitor decides to sell a holiday cottage he owns in Yorkshire. One of the solicitor’s clients offers the full asking price for the cottage and the solicitor accepts his client’s offer.

In the full knowledge that the solicitor is the seller, the client instructs the same solicitor in writing to act as his solicitor in the transaction. The solicitor accepts the instruction and prepares all the documents. The transfer is completed without complications.

Were the solicitor’s actions in accordance with the SRA Standards and Regulations?

Yes, because a solicitor can act where there is an own interest conflict if he is satisfied it is in his client’s best interests

Yes, because a solicitor can act where there is an own interest conflict if the solicitor and the client have a substantially common interest.

Yes, because a solicitor can act where there is an own interest conflict if he has received written consent from the client

No, because a solicitor cannot act if there is an own interest conflict or a significant risk of an own interest conflict.

No, because a solicitor cannot act if there is an own interest conflict unless the solicitor and the client are competing for the same objective

A

No, because a solicitor cannot act if there is an own interest conflict or a significant risk of an own interest conflict.

Correct.
There is an outright prohibition on acting where there is an own interest conflict.The SCI and CSO exceptions only applies to conflicts of interest.Receiving written consent is one of the conditions that applies to an exception to the rule that you cannot act if there is a conflict of interest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

A client telephones a solicitor to instruct her to draft wills for himself and his brother. They both wish to leave their estates to each other.

Which of the following best explains what the solicitor should do?

The solicitor cannot draft the wills for the client and the brother because there is a conflict of interests between them.

The solicitor cannot draft the wills for the client and the brother unless the brother provides instructions to her directly.

The solicitor may draft wills for the client and the brother if the brother has given written authorisation, in advance, of the client’s authority to give instructions on his behalf.

The solicitor may draft wills for the client and the brother provided the solicitor has no reason to doubt the instructions reflect the brother’s wishes.

The solicitor can draft the wills for the client and the brother because they are related to each other and there is a low risk that the instructions do not represent the brother’s wishes.

A

The solicitor may draft wills for the client and the brother if the brother has given written authorisation, in advance, of the client’s authority to give instructions on his behalf.

CORRECT: this is the position under CCS 3.1: ‘You only act for clients on instructions from the client or from someone properly authorised to provide instructions on their behalf. If you have reason to suspect that the instructions to not represent your client’s instructions, you do not act unless you have satisfied yourself that they do.’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

‘A solicitor is dealing with the administration of a deceased’s estate for a client. At the outset the solicitor gave a written estimate of the likely total costs of £10,000 including disbursements. A few weeks later the client instructs the solicitor to arrange for some shares in an overseas company to be sold. The solicitor decides the best way to do this is to instruct an agent to sell the shares. The agent’s fees will be an additional £1000.

Which of the following best explains what the solicitor should do next?

The solicitor should write to the client to inform him about the agent’s fees and ask for his instructions because the original estimate is no longer accurate.

The solicitor does not need to do anything because the agent’s fees will be incurred outside England and Wales.

The solicitor does not need to do anything because the agent will invoice the client directly.

The solicitor should write to the client to inform him about the agent’s fees and ask for his instructions because a solicitor must get prior approval for every item of expenditure.

The solicitor does not need to do anything because the client was informed that it was only an estimate at the outset.

A

The solicitor should write to the client to inform him about the agent’s fees and ask for his instructions because the original estimate is no longer accurate.

Correct. Under CCS 8.7 solicitors must ensure that clients receive the best possible information about how their matter will be priced and, both at the time of engagement and when appropriate as their matter progresses, about the likely overall cost of the matter and any costs incurred. The solicitor therefore needs to update their estimate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

A man has been arrested on suspicion of common assault by battery. He is a professional football player earning £180,000 per year.

It is alleged that the man punched a photographer who was trying to take a picture of him whilst he was having a drink with a woman in a bar.

The man has never been in trouble with the police before.

Will the man be entitled to publicly funded legal representation in connection with the defence of his case?

The man will be eligible for publicly funded legal representation by the duty solicitor at the police station and at all hearings up to and including sentence.

The man will be eligible for publicly funded legal representation by the duty solicitor at the police station, limited to telephone advice only.

The man will not be eligible for publicly funded legal representation by the duty solicitor at the police station because he will fail the means test.

The man will be eligible for publicly funded legal representation by the duty solicitor at the police station. He will not be able to get a representation order in the magistrates’ court, because even if he passes the interests of justice test, he will fail the means test which applies in the magistrates’ court.

The man will be eligible for publicly funded legal representation by the duty solicitor at the police station. He will also be able to get a representation order in the magistrates’ court provided he passes the interests of justice test, because there is no means test in the magistrates’ court.

A

The man will be eligible for publicly funded legal representation by the duty solicitor at the police station. He will not be able to get a representation order in the magistrates’ court, because even if he passes the interests of justice test, he will fail the means test which applies in the magistrates’ court.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

You are an apprentice solicitor in the corporate department of a firm. Your firm has been instructed to act for Kurtz Cars Limited (‘KCL’) which is interested in buying the shares in Bill’s Spares (‘BS’), a company which sells car parts. The shares in BS are being sold by way of auction. Neither you nor your supervisor has acted for KCL in the past.

Speedy Motors Ltd (‘SML’) has been reported in the press as being interested in acquiring the shares in BS and has contacted another partner in your firm with the intention to instruct him on their bid to buy the shares in BS. Your firm has never acted for SML.

Which ONE of the following statements is CORRECT?

Your firm may be able to act for SML because both SML and KCL have a substantially common interest. However in order to do so, both KCL and SML must give informed consent to your firm acting; you must put in place effective safeguards to protect KCL and SML’s confidential information; and you must be satisfied it is reasonable for you to act for both KCL and SML.

Your firm may be able to act for SML because both SML and KCL are competing for the same objective. However in order to do so, you must obtain the written consent of KCL, SML and BS.

This is a situation where if your firm accepted the instructions from SML, it would owe separate duties to act in the best interests of KCL and SML in relation to the same matter, and there is a risk that those interests may conflict. Neither of the exceptions apply and your firm should not accept the instructions from SML.

Your firm may be able to act for SML because both SML and KCL are competing for the same objective. However in order to do so, both KCL and SML must give informed consent to your firm acting; you must put in place effective safeguards to protect KCL and SML’s confidential information; and you must be satisfied it is reasonable for you to act for both KCL and SML.

There is no risk of a conflict of interest here. KCL and SML will not be on opposite sides of the transaction so there is no risk of their interests in the matter conflicting. Your firm will therefore be able to act for both KCL and SML.

A

Your firm may be able to act for SML because both SML and KCL are competing for the same objective. However in order to do so, both KCL and SML must give informed consent to your firm acting; you must put in place effective safeguards to protect KCL and SML’s confidential information; and you must be satisfied it is reasonable for you to act for both KCL and SML.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

You are an apprentice in the litigation department. You have just attended a meeting with your supervisor and the directors of a new client of the firm. The client has just been served with proceedings in a multi-million pound action in relation to its alleged defective design of a new football stadium. The client has instructed your supervisor to defend those proceedings.

In the meeting, your supervisor explained that he could not give any accurate cost estimates, but he would explain the costs position in a client care letter which would follow later that day. You have been asked to draft that letter for review by your supervisor.

Which ONE of the following statements is the MOST APPROPRIATE form of wording to be included in the letter to the client about your firm’s cost estimate?

  • Assume that the figure will be inserted by your supervisor

‘It is impossible to provide you with an accurate estimate as to costs at this stage for obvious reasons. Please be assured that, at all times, our costs will be fair and reasonable. We will charge our fees on a time basis, in accordance with our standard hourly rates. I suggest that we review the costs on a monthly basis and ensure that we do not incur more than [£*] plus VAT in costs and disbursements without your further approval.’

‘Whilst it is impossible at this stage, to give you an estimate as to what your total costs will be, please be assured that our costs will be fair and reasonable and you will be charged in accordance with our standard hourly rates (details attached).’

‘Given the complexity of this particular litigation it is impossible at this stage, to give you an estimate as to what your total costs will be. You will be charged in accordance with our standard hourly rates (details attached).’

‘At this stage, it is impossible to give you an estimate as to what your total costs will be in this matter, for obvious reasons. Only once we have reviewed the evidence, will we be able to provide you with any an accurate estimate in accordance with our standard hourly rates (details attached).’

‘Because of the uncertainty and complexity of this particular litigation, it is impossible to provide you with an accurate estimate as to costs at this stage. We will charge our fees on a time basis, in accordance with our standard hourly rates (attached). I suggest that we review the costs on a monthly basis. I will ensure that we do not incur more than [£*] plus VAT in costs and disbursements without your further approval.’

A

‘Because of the uncertainty and complexity of this particular litigation, it is impossible to provide you with an accurate estimate as to costs at this stage. We will charge our fees on a time basis, in accordance with our standard hourly rates (attached). I suggest that we review the costs on a monthly basis. I will ensure that we do not incur more than [£*] plus VAT in costs and disbursements without your further approval.’

Correct. This option most closely meets the requirements of CCS 8.7 which requires that clients receive the best possible information about how their matter will be priced, and both at the time of engagement and when appropriate as their matter progresses about the likely cost of the matter and any costs incurred. This option sets out the hourly rates of the firm and gives a commitment not to incur more than a specified amount in fees without the agreement of the client. It also explains why it is not possible for the firm to give an accurate estimate at this stage.
A commitment that the costs will be fair and reasonable does not give the client enough information about the likely overall cost of the matter. It is also not enough to refer to the firm’s standard hourly rates, the firm should set these out in the letter or in an attachment to the letter. Postponing giving a cost estimate until the firm has completed a review of the evidence also does not give a clear indication of the overall costs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

A claim for damages for professional negligence is settled on terms that the defendant surveyor must pay to the claimant damages of £60,000 together with the claimant’s legal costs, to be assessed on the standard basis. In 2018 the claimant had entered into a written conditional fee agreement with her solicitor which provided for a success fee of 90%. The solicitor has calculated his professional charges at £20,000 before addition of the success fee and VAT.

What sum may the solicitor charge the client for his professional fees, net of VAT?

£30,000

£38,000

£15,000

£18,000

£35,000

A

£38,000

Correct. The success fee is 90%. 90% of £20,000 is £18,000. This is on top of the ‘normal’ fee of £20,000. So the total charge is £38,000.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

A claimant brings a professional negligence claim seeking £200,000. The claimant has a damages based agreement (‘DBA’) with his solicitor which provides for the solicitor to be paid 50% of the damages in the event the claim succeeds. The claimant is awarded £160,000 at trial, which counts as ‘success’ under the terms of the DBA. The solicitor’s fees recoverable from the other side, calculated on the basis of a reasonable hourly rate, are £45,000.

What sum may the solicitor charge the client for his professional fees, net of VAT?

£125,000

£80,000

£45,000

£40,000

£100,000

A

£80,000

Correct. The solicitor is entitled to 50% of the damages. 50% of £160,000 is £80,000. Unlike a conditional fee agreement, with a DBA, if the case is successful, the solicitor will be paid a proportion of the damages awarded to the client by way of a remedy, rather than getting their charges plus a success fee, so £125,000 is wrong. £100,000 is 50% of the amount claimed by the claimant, not the amount of damages awarded by the court, and is therefore wrong. £40,000 is wrong because it is 25% of the damages awarded by the court – the maximum amount a lawyer can recover is capped at 25% in personal injury cases, 35% in employment tribunal cases and 50% in all other cases so the solicitor can recover 50% of the damages. £45,000 is the amount of the solicitor’s fees recoverable from the other side, but under the damages based agreement, the firm can recover 50% of the damages in the event the claim succeeds.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Your colleague is considering applying for the role of Compliance Officer for Legal Practice (‘COLP’) in your law firm. Which ONE of the following statements about the responsibilities of the COLP and the Compliance Officer for Finance and Administrations (‘COFA’) of a law firm is CORRECT?

The COLP must take all reasonable steps to ensure compliance by the firm, its managers, employees or interest holders with the SRA’s regulatory arrangements which apply to them.

The COLP must report any serious breach of the Code to the managing partner of a law firm, who in turn must report the breach to the SRA.

The COLP is the only person in the firm responsible to ensuring that any matters that are capable of amounting to a serious breach of the SRA Codes of Conduct are reported to the SRA.

The COLP is responsible for ensuring that the law firm, its managers and employees comply with any obligations imposed on them under the SRA Accounts Rules.

The COLP and the COFA of a law firm are solely responsible for compliance within the firm. The managers of the firm pass responsibility for compliance to the COLP and the COFA.

A

The COLP must take all reasonable steps to ensure compliance by the firm, its managers, employees or interest holders with the SRA’s regulatory arrangements which apply to them.

Correct. See CCF 9.1. The COLPs role is to take reasonable steps to ensure compliance, however ultimately, under CCF 8.1 the managers are jointly and severally responsible for compliance by the firm with CCF, not the COLP and COFA. Under CCF 9.1, the COLP must ensure the SRA is informed of any facts of matters that amount to a serious breach of the SRA’s regulatory arrangements. It is the role of the COFA to take all reasonable steps to ensure compliance with the SRA Accounts Rules.
Under CCS 7.7 all individual lawyers must report promptly to the SRA or other approved regulator any facts or matters they reasonably believe are capable of amounting to a serious breach of their regulatory arrangements (including the SRA Codes of Conduct).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

You are an apprentice in a law firm. You work in a team comprising Rav, the partner who leads the team, Amy, who qualified as a solicitor three years ago, and Kirk a paralegal who has been in the team for four years.

Which ONE of the following statements is correct?

Only a partner may supervise your work on client files.

Amy can supervise your work on client files provided she has completed at least 12 hours of relevant training.

Amy cannot supervise your work on client files because she does not have a minimum of five years post qualification experience.

Your work on client files can be supervised by Kirk provided Kirk has suitable experience, knowledge and competence to deal with any issue that may arise and he has clear guidance as to when and to whom matters outside his competence or authority should be referred.

Kirk cannot supervise your work on client files because he is not legally qualified, but either Amy or Rav can.

A

Your work on client files can be supervised by Kirk provided Kirk has suitable experience, knowledge and competence to deal with any issue that may arise and he has clear guidance as to when and to whom matters outside his competence or authority should be referred.

Correct. Under CCF 4.4 a law firm is responsible for ensuring that it has an effective system for supervising client matters. This means that appropriate procedures need to be put in place for suitable persons to check regularly the work being carried out for clients. Although most people supervising client files will have a legal qualification, they do not necessarily have to be legally qualified. As long as they have suitable experience, knowledge and competence to deal with any issue that may arise and clear guidance as to when and to whom issues should be referred ‘upward’ they are permitted to supervise client files.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

A colleague qualified into the property department of your law firm five years ago. He wishes to leave the firm and set up a business on his own as a self-employed solicitor advising clients on property transactions including selling and leasing land.

Which ONE of the following options is CORRECT?

Provided the solicitor obtains professional indemnity insurance as required by the SRA, he will not need to be authorised by the SRA because he will not be carrying out reserved legal activities under the Legal Services Act.

The solicitor will need to be authorised by the SRA because he will be carrying out reserved legal activities under the Legal Services Act. He will also need to comply with the SRA’s rules including the Code of Conduct for Solicitors and the SRA Accounts Rules

The solicitor will not need to be authorised by the SRA because he will not be carrying out reserved legal activities under the Legal Services Act. He will however need to comply with the Code of Conduct for Solicitors and the SRA Accounts Rules.

The solicitor will need to be authorised by the SRA and comply with the SRA Code of Conduct for Solicitors because he will be carrying out reserved legal activities under the Legal Services Act. However, he will not need to comply with the SRA Accounts Rules because he will not be working in a law firm.

The solicitor will need to be authorised by the SRA because he will be carrying out reserved legal activities under the Legal Services Act. However, provided he obtains authorisation from the SRA, he will not need to comply with the additional requirements contained in the Code of Conduct for Solicitors or the SRA Accounts Rules.

A

The solicitor will need to be authorised by the SRA because he will be carrying out reserved legal activities under the Legal Services Act. He will also need to comply with the SRA’s rules including the Code of Conduct for Solicitors and the SRA Accounts Rules

Correct. Advising on property transactions including selling and leasing land will involve preparing instruments of transfer relating to land and other instruments relating to real estate, which, as one of the reserved legal activities under the Legal Services Act 2007, can only be provided by someone authorised by an approved regulator. The approved regulator for solicitors is the SRA. The SRA Code of Conduct for Solicitors applies to all individuals authorised by the SRA to provide legal services. The SRA Accounts Rules apply to law firms and individuals authorised by the SRA to receive or deal with money belonging to clients. As the solicitor will be receiving and dealing with client money when purchasing land, he will need to comply with the SRA Accounts Rules.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Aron is a solicitor specialising in immigration law in a law firm. He volunteers one day a week in a law centre advising clients on immigration appeals and appearing before immigration tribunals.

Which one of the following statements is CORRECT?

The law centre does not need to be authorised by the SRA because Aron is not carrying out reserved legal activities.

The law centre must be authorised by the SRA because Aron will need higher rights of audience to appear before immigration tribunals.

The law centre does not need to be authorised by the SRA because Aron is working on a voluntary basis.

The law centre does not need to be authorised by the SRA because Aron also works in a law firm which is authorised by the SRA.

The law centre must be authorised by the SRA because Aron is carrying out reserved legal activities.

A

The law centre must be authorised by the SRA because Aron is carrying out reserved legal activities.

Correct. Law centres must be authorised by the SRA if they provide reserved legal activities regardless of whether the solicitor works on a voluntary basis. Reserved legal activities are set down in section 12 and Schedule 2 to the Legal Services Act 2007.Advising on immigration appeals falls within the conduct of litigation which is a reserved activity, in addition appearing before immigration tribunals involves rights of audience which is also a reserved legal activity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

You are a 7 year qualified solicitor in the property department of a busy law firm. You have been doing a lot of work selling flats for a large property developer client. Three months ago, when preparing bills for the client you noticed that regular payments had been made out of the client account to a partner who joined your department a year ago. You raised your concern with your firm’s Compliance Office for Finance and Administration (‘COFA’) at the time and have heard nothing further from him. He is also a busy partner in your department.

When preparing bills for the same client at the end of the month, you notice that the payments out of client account to the partner have continued. You can think of no explanation for the payments and suspect a breach of the SRA Accounts Rules.

Which ONE of the following options set out the most appropriate action you should take?

Report your concerns to the firm’s managing partner.

Confront the partner in question and raise the matter again with the Compliance Officer for Finance and Administration.

Report your concerns to your supervisor.

Report your concerns to the SRA.

Report your concerns to the Compliance Officer for Legal Practice.

A

Report your concerns to the SRA.

Correct. A breach of the SRA Accounts Rules involving suspected misappropriation of client money would amount to a serious breach of the SRA’s rules. CCS 7.7 requires you to promptly report to the SRA any facts or matters that you reasonably believe are capable of amounting to a serious breach of their regulatory arrangements by any person regulated by them (in this case the partner). You have already raised the matter with the COFA and heard nothing further. Given the severity of the breach, it would be appropriate to report your concerns to the SRA.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Question 17

A solicitor is dealing with a negligence case for a client. At the outset the solicitor gave a written estimate of likely total costs of £15,000 including counsel’s fees and other disbursements. A few weeks later the solicitor decides that expert evidence is also needed and the cost of this will be an additional £3,000.

Which of the following best explains what the solicitor should do next?

A. The solicitor does not need to do anything because the client was informed that it was only an estimate at the outset.

B. The solicitor does not need to do anything because experts’ costs are awarded by the court.

C. The solicitor does not need to do anything because he is not obliged to tell the client about third party costs.

D. The solicitor should write to the client to inform him about the cost of the expert and ask for his instructions because a solicitor must get prior approval for every item of expenditure.

E. The solicitor should write to the client to inform him about the cost of the expert and ask for his instructions because the original estimate is no longer accurate.

A

E - The solicitor should write to the client to inform him about the cost of the expert and ask for his instructions because the original estimate is no longer accurate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Question 22

A claim for damages for professional negligence is settled on terms that the defendant surveyor must pay to the claimant damages of £60,000 together with the claimant’s legal costs, to be assessed on the standard basis.

In 2020 the claimant had entered into a written conditional fee agreement with her solicitor which provided for a success fee of 90%. The solicitor has calculated his professional charges at £20,000 before addition of the success fee and VAT.

What sum may the solicitor charge the client for his professional fees, net of VAT?

A. £15,000

B. £18,000

C. £30,000

D. £35,000

E. £38,000

A

E - £38,000

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Question 32

A solicitor in a law firm has received a phone call from the managing director of a private limited company incorporated in the UK, which is a new client. The managing director wants to know why the solicitor’s firm is asking for documents to verify the identity of the company’s shareholder. The company’s shareholder lives in Brazil and owns and holds the entire shareholding of the company.

Which of the following responses best explains the advice the solicitor should give to the managing director?

A. The solicitor is under an obligation to identify and verify the identity of the company’s shareholder because the shareholder lives outside the UK.

B. The solicitor is under an obligation to identify and verify the identity of the company’s shareholder because the shareholder lives in Brazil.

C. The solicitor is under an obligation to identify and verify the identity of the company’s shareholder because the shareholder owns more than 25% of the shares.

D. The solicitor is under an obligation to identify and verify the identity of the company’s shareholder because of the structure of the company and the way the shares are held by the shareholder.

E. The solicitor is under an obligation to identify and verify the identity of the company’s shareholder because there is only one shareholder in the company.

A

C - The solicitor is under an obligation to identify and verify the identity of the company’s shareholder because the shareholder owns more than 25% of the shares.

17
Q

A solicitor is advising a client on an employment contract in respect of a position that the client has been offered in a start-up company. The client currently has a permanent position at an established company.

The following day the solicitor sits next to a new acquaintance at a golf club dinner. The new acquaintance tells the solicitor that he is concerned that the business he works for is bound for financial failure because its key customer is to be taken into receivership shortly. The new acquaintance then tells the solicitor the name of the business he works for. Much to the solicitor’s surprise it is, by coincidence, the start-up company.

Is the solicitor obliged to inform the client of the reported concerns about the financial prospects of the start-up company?

A. No, because the information was obtained in the course of the solicitor’s personal life and therefore does not impact on his professional obligations.

B. No, because the duty of confidentiality overrides the duty of disclosure.

C. No, because information obtained from clients must be kept confidential unless disclosure is required or permitted by law or the client consents.

D. Yes, because the information is material to the client’s matter.

E. Yes, because the duty of disclosure overrides the duty of confidentiality.

A

D - Yes, because the information is material to the client’s matter.

18
Q

Question 6

A solicitor acts for a client who is found guilty of theft. The client asks the solicitor to present a plea in mitigation on her behalf. At the hearing the client gives the court a false address and date of birth in order to conceal the fact that she has previous convictions.

Which of the following statements best describes what the solicitor should do?

A. Cease to act immediately.

B. Not refer to the client’s character or previous convictions.

C. Immediately correct the information about the client’s address and date of birth without further reference to the client.

D. Not refer directly to the client’s previous convictions but imply that she is of good character.

E. Ask the client to correct the information about her address and date of birth and, if she refuses, cease to act.

A

E - Ask the client to correct the information about her address and date of birth and, if she refuses, cease to act.

19
Q

A solicitor has been contacted by a woman who asks him to represent her father by attending him at the police station. The father has been arrested on suspicion of attempted murder and is in custody at the police station.

The solicitor is fully aware of the circumstances of the allegation as he represented the woman’s brother several days ago when the brother was arrested for the same offence. The brother has now been charged with the offence. The firm will carry out the usual conflict of interest check.

Does the SRA Code of Conduct for Solicitors, RELs and RFLs permit the solicitor to represent the woman’s father at the police station?

A. No, although the solicitor can accept instructions from a third party, he cannot accept instructions from a close family member of the proposed client.

B. No, the solicitor cannot accept instructions from a third party under any circumstances.

C. Yes, the solicitor can accept instructions from the woman provided he is satisfied that the woman has the authority to give instructions and that there is no conflict of interest or risk of conflict.

D. Yes, the solicitor can accept instructions from the woman provided he is satisfied that the woman has the authority to give instructions. A conflict of interest can never arise between close family members and there is no need to wait for the outcome of the conflict of interest check.

E. Yes, the solicitor can accept instructions from the woman provided he is satisfied that the woman has the authority to give instructions. A conflict of interest will not arise where close family members are implicated in the same offence and there is no need to wait for the outcome of the conflict of interest check.

A

C - Yes, the solicitor can accept instructions from the woman provided he is satisfied that the woman has the authority to give instructions and that there is no conflict of interest or risk of conflict.

20
Q

A solicitor supplements his income with buy-to-let flats. The solicitor decides to sell one of the flats and use the capital for another investment. One of the solicitor’s clients offers the full asking price for the flat and the solicitor accepts his client’s offer.

In the full knowledge that the solicitor is the seller, the client instructs the same solicitor in writing to act as his solicitor in the transaction. The solicitor accepts the instruction and prepares all the documents. The transfer is completed without complications.

Were the solicitor’s actions in accordance with the SRA Standards and Regulations?

A. Yes, because a solicitor can act where there is an own interest conflict if he has received written consent from the client.

B. Yes, because a solicitor can act where there is an own interest conflict if he is satisfied it is in his client’s best interests.

C. Yes, because a solicitor can act where there is an own interest conflict if the solicitor and the client have a substantially common interest.

D. No, because a solicitor cannot act if there is an own interest conflict unless the solicitor and the client are competing for the same objective.

E. No, because a solicitor cannot act if there is an own interest conflict or a significant risk of an own interest conflict.

A

E - No, because a solicitor cannot act if there is an own interest conflict or a significant risk of an own interest conflict.

21
Q

You act for a food wholesaler in a breach of contract dispute with a food retailer. The court has ordered standard disclosure and both parties have carried out the requisite searches, prepared and served disclosure lists and carried out inspection. An email (the ‘Email’) then comes to the wholesaler’s attention. The Email is adverse to the wholesaler’s position and falls within the scope of the wholesaler’s disclosure obligations. Through no fault of the wholesaler, it was unaware of the Email at the time disclosure lists were served. The wholesaler indicates to you that in no circumstances will it notify the other party of the Email, disclose it or permit inspection.

Which of the following courses of action should you take if the wholesaler maintains this position regardless of your advice?

Select one alternative:

You should notify the court of the Email.

You are not required to take any further action.

You should notify the retailer’s solicitor of the Email.

You should apply to court for permission to disclose the Email.

You should cease to act.

A

You should cease to act.

In failing to disclose the document, the wholesaler is failing to comply with a disclosure obligation and is also misleading the court and the opponent. Pursuant to Rule 1.4 of the Code of Conduct, you cannot be complicit in the actions of others that mislead the court. You will therefore need to cease to act. You cannot notify the court or the retailer of the email (whether by an application to court or otherwise) as this would be to breach the obligation of confidentiality owed to the wholesaler.

22
Q

Your firm has a referral agreement with another law firm under which, if one firm (the ‘Introducer’) refers a client to the other (the ‘Recipient’), the Recipient will pay the Introducer 5% of the fees paid by the client in the matter (‘Referral Fee’). A partner in the other firm has referred a client to you. The client is seeking to bring a claim for damages for personal injury arising from a car accident.

Which one of the following options is correct?

Select one alternative:

You can act for the client, but you must obtain the client’s permission to pay the Referral Fee to the other firm.

You must turn down the referral.

You can act for the client and pay the Referral Fee provided you inform the client of your fee sharing arrangement with the other firm.

You cannot pay the Referral Fee to the other firm. You could act for the client without paying the Referral Fee if this was agreed with the other firm.

You must turn down the referral and report the other firm to the SRA for referring a client to you in breach of the SRA’s rules and regulations.

A

You cannot pay the Referral Fee to the other firm. You could act for the client without paying the Referral Fee if this was agreed with the other firm.

Section 56(1) of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (‘LASPO’) prohibits solicitors from referring or receiving referrals in respect of a claimant’s claim for damages in respect of personal injury or death to each other in consideration for a referral fee. You would therefore not be able to accept the instructions and pay the Referral Fee. You could however accept the instructions and not pay the referral fee to the other firm, if this was agreed with the other firm. It is not clear from the question that the other firm is insisting on payment of the Referral Fee, so it would not be necessary to report the firm to the SRA. These points were covered in the recording ‘Introduction to the regulation of law firms’.

23
Q

You receive instructions to act for Company A in relation to the sale of a portfolio of properties. All the shares in Company A are owned by a man who is a UK resident. You have not acted for Company A before.

Which of the following statements best explains what customer due diligence (‘CDD’) you must undertake?

Select one alternative:

You should carry out ongoing monitoring on Company A and the man because you have not acted for Company A before.

You should carry out standard CDD on Company A.

You should carry out simplified CDD on Company A and identify and verify the man as he is the beneficial owner of Company A.

You should carry out enhanced CDD on Company A and identify and verify the man as he is the beneficial owner of Company A.

You should carry out standard CDD on Company A and identify and verify the man as he is the beneficial owner of Company A

A

You should carry out standard CDD on Company A and identify and verify the man as he is the beneficial owner of Company A.

This question is about the level of CDD that must be carried by a solicitor when they are carrying out an occasional transaction or establishing a business relationship. This was covered in the element on ‘Money laundering – CDD’. There is nothing to suggest Company A presents a high risk of money laundering (which would require enhanced CDD), adn simplified CDD is only appropriate where there is a low degree of risk of money laundering. Where the client is a company, you must also identify and verify the beneficial owner (the person who owns more than 25% of the voting shares in the company).

24
Q

You have received instructions from a new client who wants to buy a holiday apartment in Wales. The client lives in France and is funding 50% of the purchase in cash from the sale of some shares and 50% by a mortgage from a UK bank. You expect that this will be a one-off transaction for the client.

Which of the following statements best explains the customer due diligence you must carry out before proceeding with the transaction?

Select one alternative:

You should carry out enhanced customer due diligence because the client is not resident in the UK.

You should carry out enhanced due diligence because the client is funding half of the purchase in cash.

You should carry out standard customer due diligence because there is nothing to suggest the client presents a high risk of money laundering.

You should carry out standard due diligence because the client presents a low risk of money laundering as part of the funding is from a UK bank.

You should carry out simplified customer due diligence because the client presents a low risk of money laundering as you have identified the source of the funding.

A

You should carry out standard customer due diligence because there is nothing to suggest the client presents a high risk of money laundering.

This question concerns the level of CDD that must be carried by a solicitor when they are carrying out an occasional transaction for client based overseas. This is covered in the element ‘Money laundering – CDD’. You should carry out standard customer due diligence. There is nothing on the facts to suggest this client presents a high risk of money laundering. The client is not from a high risk country and the transaction is not complex. You have identified how the client is funding the purchase so there is no need for enhanced CDD. For simplified CDD to apply there would need to be a reason to consider this particularly low risk, for example the client being a local authority, a listed company or other trusted party, which is not the case here.

25
Q

You work in the corporate department of a firm. Arshad wishes to instruct your firm in connection with the acquisition of a small abattoir business which processes and supplies Halal meat to butchers who serve the Islamic community. The purchase price for the business is to be £750,000 and the agreement will be governed by English law.

Which ONE of the following reasons would your supervisor be able to rely on to refuse to accept Arshad’s instructions?

It is your firm’s policy not to accept instructions in relation to corporate acquisitions where the purchase price is less than £1 million

Your supervisor will not be able to effectively communicate with Arshad as Arshad’s first language is Bengali and he only has a limited understanding of English

You supervisor considers that they do not have sufficient religious knowledge to be able to advise on the sale of the abattoir business.

A

It is your firm’s policy not to accept instructions in relation to corporate acquisitions where the purchase price is less than £1 million

Correct.
Race and religion or belief are both protected characteristics under the Equality Act. Under section 29, a person concerned with the provision of a service to the public, or a section of the public must not discriminate against a person requiring the service by not providing the person with the service. It would be discriminatory to refuse to provide the service because of either of these protected characteristics.
In relation to the language issue, while there may be a communication problem, this can be resolved by making arrangements for a translator to assist in translation of documents and to attend meetings.
In relation to religious knowledge it is unlikely that religious knowledge is necessary to complete the legal work in purchasing the business. The client will be looking to the solicitor for legal advice, not advice on the religious aspects of slaughtering animals in an abattoir, and to the extent knowledge of Islamic practice is needed, the solicitor will need to obtain this from the client. The policy not to accept instructions where the purchase price is less than £1 million is not discriminatory and would apply regardless of the race or religion of the client.

26
Q

You have been asked to go to the reception of your firm’s offices to meet Margaret, a prospective client. Margaret has never been to your firm before and your firm has never acted for her. You have been asked to bring her to a meeting room for a preliminary meeting with your supervisor.

Bearing in mind the different factual scenarios set out below, which ONE of the following statements is CORRECT?

When you get to reception you discover that Margaret is profoundly deaf. She is able to lip read but has asked your firm to record the meeting and have the meeting notes transcribed so she can review them before deciding whether or not to instruct your firm. Your firm does not usually transcribe meetings and will have to pay someone to transcribe the meeting notes. The firm can pass the cost of paying for the notes to be transcribed to Margaret.

When you get to reception to you discover that Margaret has come for advice on a prenuptial agreement in relation to her forthcoming marriage to her partner Sarah. You are strongly opposed to the idea of gay marriage hand have asked your supervisor if you can be excused from acting for Margaret as you do not feel you will be able to give her objective advice. Your supervisor permits your request and is right to do so on the ground that insisting you act for Margaret means you will not be able to comply with Principle 7.

In the meeting Margaret reveals she is transgender and she has been denied the right to compete as a female at her local archery club and she would like to challenge the decision. Your supervisor believes that women who are transgender should not be able to compete in such circumstances and refuses to act for her. Even though Margaret is not yet a client of the firm, it is likely your supervisor will be found to be in breach of CCS 1.1.

A

In the meeting Margaret reveals she is transgender and she has been denied the right to compete as a female at her local archery club and she would like to challenge the decision. Your supervisor believes that women who are transgender should not be able to compete in such circumstances and refuses to act for her. Even though Margaret is not yet a client of the firm, it is likely your supervisor will be found to be in breach of CCS 1.1.

Correct. Under CCS 1.1 you must ensure that you do not unfairly discriminate by allowing your personal views to affect your professional relationships and the way in which you provide your services, the supervisor will have breached this provision if they refuse to act for Margaret.
Sexual orientation is a protected characteristic under the Equality Act (‘EA’). and refusing to act for Margaret on the grounds of her sexual orientation would be discriminatory and unlawful under EA. In addition the supervisor would be breaching CCS 1.1.
In relating to transcribing the notes for the meeting, you have an obligation under CCS 3.4 to take account of your client’s attributes, needs and circumstances. You will therefore need to transcribe the notes. You also have a duty to make reasonable adjustments to the service you provider under section 29 EA. You will not be able to pass on the costs for these adjustments, see the Guidance on the SRA’s approach to equality, diversity and inclusion.