Main Ideas: Liberalism Flashcards
what is liberalism?
Developed much later than the realist theory being in part a response to the theoretical deficiencies in realism and a reaction to a number of developments in the latter half of the 20th century that could not be explained by realism….
Decline in conflict
Rise in democracy
Growth in world trade
Growth in number of GOs
development of liberalism: DECLINE IN
CONFLICT
Number of deaths in battle had fallen to less than 10,000 in 2006
compared with 600,000 in 1951
Nature of conflict also changed from predominantly interstate conflict (war between states) to intrastate conflict and Civil War
development of liberalism: RISE IN
DEMOCRACY
By 2006 over half of all countries had become democracies
A huge development and factor in the decline in conflict as democracies tend to be far less aggressive than authoritarian regimes
According to the democratic peace theory no two democracies have ever been to war with each other
By 2006 over half of all countries had become democracies
A huge development and factor in the decline in conflict as democracies tend to be far less aggressive than authoritarian regimes
According to the democratic peace theory no two democracies have ever been to war with each other
Worldwide exports are worth $629 million in 1960 by 2010 they were worth $30 trillion
Suggests that states are becoming increasingly interdependent which is thought to reduce the potential for conflict between them
States will not risk conflict if it jeopardises the sale of exports and the supply of imported goods
development of liberalism: GROWTH IN
NUMBER OF IGOs
The postwar era has witnessed a huge rise in the number of IGOs, including the UN EU NATO IMF ICC and more
Demonstrates a desire on the part of states to cooperate rather than go to war with each other
h
Liberalism may appear to be a less highly developed theory than
realism
this is because liberalism developed in reaction to the realist theory so there is less need for a priori reasoning (theoretical deduction) and much of the liberal theory develops from observable facts about the world
It’s a fact that states want to cooperate and they do so through alliances trade agreements and international organisations
human nature:
Liberalism takes the polar opposite view of human nature to realism
According to realist individuals are selfish and put their interests before all others but liberals argue that individuals are altruistic and capable of a selfless concern for others
Liberals have a much more optimistic view of human nature
human nature:
Liberals would argue that evidence that humans are altruistic and capable of a selfless concern for others can be seen by the fact that many states provide at least 0.7% of their GDP as international development aid
human nature:
the Human potential for altruism and selflessness is demonstrated theoretically and practically
for example Rousseau uses the Stag Hunt scenario to show how humans are naturally altruistic
human nature: the stag hunt scenario
Two Hunters track a stag if they work together they can kill the stag and both enjoy a hearty meal
If they are discovered or do not cooperate the stag will flee and both will go hungry
The hunters hide for hours but there is no trace of the stag meanwhile a hare appears on the path and if one hunter kills the hare he will get to eat but this will scare off the stag and the other hunter will starve
there is no certainty that the stag will arrive but the hare is guaranteed and if one hunger waits for the stag there is the possibility of the other hunter killing the hare for himself and ruining the prospects of the stag being caught
human nature:
Rousseau claims that the hunters will wait for the stag together because…
• the stag yields more food than the hare
• in any given scenario at least one hunter is guaranteed food but if they cooperate to kill the stag, both will eat
• both hunters are rational and equally informed, so recognise cooperation is the best option
• the benefits to each hunter in waiting for the stag far outweigh the benefits to any individual hunter in catching the hare
therefore, cooperation is the best option
human nature:
David Hume presents two further scenarios where selflessness and cooperation is more beneficial to everyone
1) rowing a boat - two people are needed to row the boat, if both cooperate by rowing together they will successfully move the boat but if only one rows, he wastes his effort and no progress is made
2) draining a meadow - two people want to drain a meadow, if they work together the meadow will be drained quicker but if one fails to cooperate, the meadow will not be drained
human nature:
Practically the benefits of selflessness can be seen in the animal world
Killer whales carousel feed which involves working together in groups to corral large schools of fish to the surface and stunning them by hitting them with their tales, each whale then takes its share of the kill
Similarly Wolves hunt in packs and lions hunt in prides
Beehives are highly sophisticated units with each individual bee performing a necessary role for the greater good of the whole community
possibility of harmony and balance:
If altruism is possible in human nature and states can also behave altruistically and selflessly because they are ruled by people
States do not have to be the self interested actors described by realism
possibility of harmony and balance:
Liberals reject the realist assumption that states are unitary actors instead of arguing that the interest of states reflect the plurality of interest in a state
This allows for the possibility that states interest change according to which political groups control the executive and legislature or even according to public opinion and pressure group activity
Challenges the realist view that states will always be primarily concerned with power and this will not change
Also challenges the realist view that states are you need to reactors by suggesting states are influenced by the public and pressure groups - a state cannot just act in its own interests it must consider public opinion
possibility of harmony and balance:
CASE STUDY: Vietnam War
Example of a state being influenced by public pressure and public opinion leading to a change in public policy
As more and more young men were drafted to fight in Vietnam and the number of American casualties increased from the mid 60s onwards more and more Americans began protesting against the
war
Protest reached its height in 1970 when 4 students were shot dead at an anti-war protest at Kent State University this led to nationwide student protests
Opinion polls showed that only 1/3 of Americans supported the war
Shortly after this the US government began to drastically reduced troop numbers in Vietnam and in 1975 the last US personnel were evacuated from the capital of Vietnam
possibility of harmony and balance:
Liberals also argue that the constitutional and political organisation of a state affects its behaviour towards other states
In this sense liberals have something in common with classical realists
possibility of harmony and balance:
Constitutional organisations refer to the mechanisms in place to protect human rights or allow for judicial review of the executive
states with such mechanisms tend to be less aggressive but they also tend to intervene in the affairs of other states when they feel that human rights are under threat
possibility of harmony and balance:
Political organisation refers to whether a state is a democracy or a dictatorship
Democracies value the rule of law and involve government changes taking place through elections in which everyone must accept the result and does
These democracies are better placed to resolve disputes with other states because they are accustomed to settling internal political disputes peacefully
But dictatorships use terror and oppression against their political opponents so tend to resort to using the same tactics against other states