Basic Information Flashcards
×2 main theories of international relations
REALISM - The oldest of the two, the dominant theory until the early 20th century
LIBERALISM - Emerged as a challenge to the pessimism of the realist theory
How do Comparative theories differ (1 example)
Each theory has different views about human nature motivations of state the nature of power etcetera
For example Liberals believe states cooperate to achieve peace and security but realists argue that war is inevitable
what is realism?
A wider school of thought in international relations theory that believes that world politics will remain a field of conflict among actors pursuing power
what is liberalism?
A wide school of thought in international relations theory that rejects power politics as the sole outcome of international relations instead emphasising mutual benefits and cooperation
main divisions between realism and liberalism
Human nature
Power
Order and security
The likelihood of conflict
International organisations
The significance of states
human nature
REALISM - Human nature is selfish
LIBERALISM - Human nature is altruistic
Power
REALISM - There is a finite amount of power so states compete in a zero sum game for power
LIBERALISM - Power is unlimited and Allstates can gain it, it is not a game of winners and losers
order and security
REALISM - International anarchy mean states act with impunity lack of trust between state leads to a security dilemma peace can only be maintained by the emergence of a hegemon or a balance of power
LIBERALISM - The international system is characterised by cooperation and complex interdependence
the likelihood of conflict
REALISM - The security dilemma means that conflict is inevitable
LIBERALISM - It is in the states interest to cooperate so conflict can be avoided and is not inevitable
international organisations
REALISM - International organisations are doomed to fail or at best be ineffective the lack of trust between states and the pursuit of national interest will render corporation difficult there is a danger that such organisations will be dominated by great powers or a global hegemon
LIBERALISM - International organisations are growing in number and influence
the significance of states
REALISM - States are the principal actors in the international system, they reflect selfish human nature by pursuing their national interest, states are unitary rational and amoral (not guided by any sense of morality or justice)
LIBERALISM - States are not the only important actors in the international system and they are declining importance, states are not necessarily self interested they can be guided by moral principles, they are not unitary actors