magical thinking Flashcards
What is Magical Thinking?
- occurs when someone explicitly or implicitly attributes relationships between actions and events to non-natural causes
- e.g. someone’s thoughts by themselves can directly bring about effects in the world
- irrationality is cognition or behaviour that makes inadequate use of reason and evidence
Criteria for a Thought to be labelled as ‘Magic’
Rosengren & French (2013):
1. natural causality
* belief (realise) that objects/events (follow pattern/order that) are governed by laws of nature
2. violation
* belief that an object/event violates/contradicts normal laws of nature
3. supernatural causality
* belief that some alternative form of causality occurs outside the laws of nature
What do Beliefs not need to be to be labelled as ‘magic’?
The belief does not need to be conscious for thinking to be labelled as magic
Subbotsky (2000):
* MT in most cases is not under conscious control
Natural Laws Challenged by MT
Nature is:
1.) physical
* everything consists of matter alone (nature, minds, consciousness)
2.) deterministic
* everything caused by mechanistic interactions of matter
* one possible future state of universe
3.) mindless
* most objects/entities have no mind (only humans & some animals do)
4.) purposeless
* only minds have purposes (universe has no goals/intentions)
How do Humans Make Sense of the World?
- matter, causality, minds & purposes
- these are concepts which humans use to make sense of the world
- they are subjective impressions attributed to the world
- it’s rational to hold these concepts as they provide a sound understanding of the world
Types of Magic Thinking (9)
- essentialism (believe things can’t be explained by science alone)
- contagion (believe essences are contagious)
- fatalism (believe certain events are destined to occur)
- teleological thinking (believe there’s a purpose to the universe)
- anthropomorphism (believe certain objects & animals have human-like mental abilities)
- sympathy (believe those interconnections are made according to likeness)
- dualism (believe there’s 2 types of substances: 1 material & 1 immaterial)
- vitalism (believe living things possess animating energy/life force)
- holism (believe vital energies of individuals are all interconnected)
Explicit MT is … ?
Irrational
Superstitious Beliefs
Jahoda (1969):
* 37/51 pedestrians stepped into road to avoid walking under ladder
* 72.5%; 95% CIs [59.0, 82.9]
Law of Contagion
Rozin et al (1986):
* transfer of an underlying essence from source to recipient through some form of direct or indirect contact
* e.g. reluctant to taste juice if a sterilised dead cockroach was dipped in it
* e.g. less willing to try chocolate if shaped like faeces than a control
* e.g. prefer to taste sugar water from a glass labelled ‘Sucrose’ than one labelled ‘Cyanide’
Moral Contagion
Eskine, Novreske & Richards (2013):
* IV: contact with “immoral” confederate or no contact
* DV: self-Reported State Guilt
* expt. 1: indirect contact (M = 2.82, SD = 0.66) & No Contact (M = 2.28, SD = 0.77), N = 54, Cohen’s d = 0.75 95% CI [0.19, 1.30]
* expt. 2: replicated with direct contact
- bigger effect in ppts who have high disgust sensitivity
- note: positive moral contagion
‘Tempting Fate’ Study
(Risen & Gilovich, 2008):
* ppts (N=62) read a scenario (about Jon applying to graduate school and that Stanford was his top choice - Jon’s mother sent him a Stanford T-shirt)
* IV: Tempt Fate or Not
- ppts read either that Jon wore the shirt while awaiting Stanford’s decision (tempt fate) or did not wear the shirt (not tempt fate)
* DV: How likely Stanford would accept Jon acceptance
- between 0 (not at all likely) & 10 (extremely likely)
* ppts believed Jon’s application was less likely to be accepted if he tempted fate (M = 5.19, SD = 1.35) than if he didn’t (M = 6.13, SD = 1.02)
* Cohen’s d = 0.78, 95% CI [0.26, 1.29]
What are ‘Just World’ Beliefs?
- example of teleological thinking (belief there’s purpose to the universe)
- the world is fair (e.g. karma)
- blaming the victim
3 Theories to Explain MT
Rosengren & French (2013):
1.) Dual-Process Theory
- system 1 (Intuition) & System 2 (Reflection)
2.) Tendency to attribute causality
- to events close in time and proximity
- even when the events are clearly random
3.) Tendency to essentialise
- “individuals treat objects and entities in the world as if they have an underlying core nature or “essence” that determines the properties and characteristics of that object or entity”
Which of the following is not a type of magical thinking?
a) anthropomorphization
b) the conjurers dilemma
c) belief in a just world
d) contagion
b) the conjurers dilemma
Which of the following is not a type of magical thinking?
a) essentialism
b) luck
c) fatalism
d) The Penn-Teller illusion
d) The Penn-Teller illusion